Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Answered all of them but you reject the answers so you engage in liberal make pretend that they weren’t answered. Also, with any given point and counterpoint dialogue at USMB it is Never incumbent upon one party to respond to questions that another party crafts up and certainly not to their satisfaction. It’s called diversion which equals hoaxing.You can't answer any of my questions. You lose.Once again shit for brains. 5% of the population has always voted by mail which is not the same as all or mostly all of the votersReally? Says who? Are people with covid unqualified? What about people who do not have vehicles, or their polling places have been shut down? What about disabled folks who can't leave the house? How are they unqualified? If you are unable to answer, then you are nothing but a liar.If voting in person is too much of an ordeal then you are unqualified to vote so dont
And who says so is anyone with an ounce of gumption snd motivation
Typical liberal hoax trying to present the exception as the rule
By the way, Republicans closing 868 polling places in the south in minority areas, is going to change the way we vote because of voter suppression,and turn this country back to "all" the people who deserve a free and fair election. So screw you mf.
Who said anything about purging dead people? I didn't,you did. Purging voters illegally for double voting when that didn't happen is not an argument you have the luxury of refuting; The Election Was Stolen - Here’s How... - Greg PalastIt isn't the job of the post office to read other people's mail. It's their job to deliver it. If the envelopes show a different address, that's not on the post office.Thanks, you just argued against your own argument that it was fraud, and replaced it with incompetence. Dude, you are too easy.A tiny minority? Entire states vote exclusively by mail and have for years. In 2016 over 20% of all votes were cast by mail.That method has always been for a tiny minority and not the total voting public.So what you're saying is that absentee balloting (which Republicans have used for years) is not valid?This is taking a simple and accurate method and turning it into an agenda fulfilling nightmare.
“Expert analysis of each signature” would take many many months.
Libs don’t want results from this election because they fear the result.
223K Clark County NV Mail Ballots Went to Wrong Addresses in 2020 Primary
County Returns: 17% of Clark County Voter Roll Shows Wrong Addresses
No, that's incompetence.
Thanks, you just argued against your own argument
How did pointing out the inability of the Post office to correctly mail out millions of ballots argue against voter fraud which is made easier by mailing out ballots to every registered voter?
Do you make it a habit to present to us ridiculous arguments because you cannot produce any intelligent one's?
If the envelopes show a different address, that's not on the post office.
So the voter rolls are that fucked up?
Maybe mailing everyone a ballot without purging dead, moved and invalid registrations is a stupid idea? I see why you like it.
Do you make it a habit to present to us ridiculous arguments
I make it a habit to refute your ridiculous arguments.
Start refuting loser.
This thread is not about whether or not government mailing ballots all over the place without being prompted is a good idea or not. I think it's not, but that's for another thread.
The parties of course are competing with each other. And realistically, there are only two parties that win any substantial number of elections. Fair play in all competitions is that rules are agreed on before the competition by the contestants.
That Democrats are ramming a new system down everyone's throats is in itself wrong and despotic. The parties should agree to changing the system of deciding who wins those competitions before the competition. One party should not be able to unilaterally change the rules themselves on their own.
Democrats keep saying we're a "democracy." Well, when one side is deciding how we determine the winner, it's not. Democrats are more and more like any despotic government that decides how elections will be run and who will win.
If mail in ballots are better, then we need to take the time and figure out how to make it work so both sides are comfortable.
So the question to address in the thread: Should one party be able to unilaterally be able to change the basic rules of the game over the objections of the other party?
I say no. Republicans should not be able to do it either
So, attacking the argument without refuting it, shows you lost the argument.
Who said anything about purging dead people? I didn't,you did. Purging voters illegally for double voting when that didn't happen is not an argument you have the luxury of refuting; The Election Was Stolen - Here’s How... - Greg PalastIt isn't the job of the post office to read other people's mail. It's their job to deliver it. If the envelopes show a different address, that's not on the post office.Thanks, you just argued against your own argument that it was fraud, and replaced it with incompetence. Dude, you are too easy.A tiny minority? Entire states vote exclusively by mail and have for years. In 2016 over 20% of all votes were cast by mail.That method has always been for a tiny minority and not the total voting public.So what you're saying is that absentee balloting (which Republicans have used for years) is not valid?This is taking a simple and accurate method and turning it into an agenda fulfilling nightmare.
“Expert analysis of each signature” would take many many months.
Libs don’t want results from this election because they fear the result.
223K Clark County NV Mail Ballots Went to Wrong Addresses in 2020 Primary
County Returns: 17% of Clark County Voter Roll Shows Wrong Addresses
No, that's incompetence.
Thanks, you just argued against your own argument
How did pointing out the inability of the Post office to correctly mail out millions of ballots argue against voter fraud which is made easier by mailing out ballots to every registered voter?
Do you make it a habit to present to us ridiculous arguments because you cannot produce any intelligent one's?
If the envelopes show a different address, that's not on the post office.
So the voter rolls are that fucked up?
Maybe mailing everyone a ballot without purging dead, moved and invalid registrations is a stupid idea? I see why you like it.
Do you make it a habit to present to us ridiculous arguments
I make it a habit to refute your ridiculous arguments.
Start refuting loser.
Who said anything about purging dead people?
Dead people shouldn't be purged?
Purging voters illegally
Can you read?
223K Clark County NV Mail Ballots Went to Wrong Addresses in 2020 Primary
Does this sound like too many people were purged in Nevada?
Chain of custody brokenOnce again shit for brains. 5% of the population has always voted by mail which is not the same as all or mostly all of the votersReally? Says who? Are people with covid unqualified? What about people who do not have vehicles, or their polling places have been shut down? What about disabled folks who can't leave the house? How are they unqualified? If you are unable to answer, then you are nothing but a liar.If voting in person is too much of an ordeal then you are unqualified to vote so dont
And who says so is anyone with an ounce of gumption snd motivation
Typical liberal hoax trying to present the exception as the rule
How can the GOP if absentees can vote by mail? Son there again show’s your stupid yet againThis thread is not about whether or not government mailing ballots all over the place without being prompted is a good idea or not. I think it's not, but that's for another thread.
The parties of course are competing with each other. And realistically, there are only two parties that win any substantial number of elections. Fair play in all competitions is that rules are agreed on before the competition by the contestants.
That Democrats are ramming a new system down everyone's throats is in itself wrong and despotic. The parties should agree to changing the system of deciding who wins those competitions before the competition. One party should not be able to unilaterally change the rules themselves on their own.
Democrats keep saying we're a "democracy." Well, when one side is deciding how we determine the winner, it's not. Democrats are more and more like any despotic government that decides how elections will be run and who will win.
If mail in ballots are better, then we need to take the time and figure out how to make it work so both sides are comfortable.
So the question to address in the thread: Should one party be able to unilaterally be able to change the basic rules of the game over the objections of the other party?
I say no. Republicans should not be able to do it either
Gee, your unbiased opinion is ... well bullshit. The D's support universal suffrage (and that means every citizen of the United States has the absolute right to vote, born here or naturalized) Period, end of debate.
The GOP seeks to suppress the vote of US Citizens. That cannot be denied.
He invents scenarios out of thin air, as a response to an already failed argument, while in midstream, invents or implies other posters are telling him something else about a totally different topic. I argue him down about double voting purges of people that never existed, which stole over a million votes from minorities, and he twists the conversation that purging people are dead, is somehow the same thing.Has nothing to do with it. Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time. And now they will go in over drive with it. They knew a long time ago, that Covid would bring on mail- in -voting. They have to stop it to suppress the vote. There is no legitimate reason to defund an institution that has been successful for decades other than to suppress the vote and feed the corporate elites.Defunding the post office by Trump to suppress the vote is disastrous for voters. That's the only disaster there is.Ha, you forgot about the defunding process of the post office by Trump. Mail in will be a disaster if you defund and suppress the vote that way.
It will be a disaster regardless.
They lost $2.2 billion in the 2nd quarter, without hundreds of millions of ballots being sent out.
Has nothing to do with it. Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time.
Sneaky how they stopped Clinton and Obama from funding it for 16 years, eh?
They have to stop it to suppress the vote. There is no legitimate reason to defund an institution that has been successful for decades
I know!!! And with a 20% failure rate on recent election mailings, what could go wrong?Uff...how they stopped Clinton and Obama from funding it for 16 years, eh?
The Gov't doesnt fund the USPS at all, dope.
Not a dime of tax money goes there.
The Gov't doesnt fund the USPS at all, dope.
Not a dime of tax money goes there.
Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time.
You should tell that to the stupid twat who posted this ^I understand quite clearly what that poster meant. Why don't you?You should tell that to the stupid twat who posted this ^
Because you, like most Trumpians, are incompetent.
Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the back
Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the backwww.google.com
House committee requests hearing with postmaster general amid mail-in voting concerns
The House Oversight and Reform Committee on Monday asked Postmaster General Louis DeJoy to answer questions at an upcoming hearing as concerns mount over delivery delays and how they could aff…thehill.com
.
Postmaster general, a Trump crony, admits slowing the mail
Trump’s Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, admitted yesterday, in a closed-door meeting with lawmakers, that he is behind the wave of mail delays rolling across the country in recent weeks.peoplesworld.org
I understand quite clearly what that poster meant. Why don't you?
You said no tax dollars go there. Were you lying, or was the twat?Your incompetence has left you adrift yet again.You said no tax dollars go there. Were you lying, or was the twat?
I gave you the answer, dope.
If no taxpayer dollars fund them, Republicans can't defund them.
Don't tell the twat.Your incompetence makes you appear retarded.If no taxpayer dollars fund them, Republicans can't defund them.
Don't tell the twat.
I've given you everything you need to understand what you should already know.
Their arguments go through such an ass whipping, that they have to twist the conversation to mean an entirely different thing. He talks about oranges in one post, then flips to apples in the next to camouflage how bad he got his ass kicked over oranges. Too funny.He's an argument/topic flipper when he's losing. Always has been. His pattern to hide his defeat is always the same.Has nothing to do with it. Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time. And now they will go in over drive with it. They knew a long time ago, that Covid would bring on mail- in -voting. They have to stop it to suppress the vote. There is no legitimate reason to defund an institution that has been successful for decades other than to suppress the vote and feed the corporate elites.Defunding the post office by Trump to suppress the vote is disastrous for voters. That's the only disaster there is.Ha, you forgot about the defunding process of the post office by Trump. Mail in will be a disaster if you defund and suppress the vote that way.
It will be a disaster regardless.
They lost $2.2 billion in the 2nd quarter, without hundreds of millions of ballots being sent out.
Has nothing to do with it. Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time.
Sneaky how they stopped Clinton and Obama from funding it for 16 years, eh?
They have to stop it to suppress the vote. There is no legitimate reason to defund an institution that has been successful for decades
I know!!! And with a 20% failure rate on recent election mailings, what could go wrong?Uff...how they stopped Clinton and Obama from funding it for 16 years, eh?
The Gov't doesnt fund the USPS at all, dope.
Not a dime of tax money goes there.
The Gov't doesnt fund the USPS at all, dope.
Not a dime of tax money goes there.
Trump and the Republicans have been defunding the post office for a long time.
You should tell that to the stupid twat who posted this ^I understand quite clearly what that poster meant. Why don't you?You should tell that to the stupid twat who posted this ^
Because you, like most Trumpians, are incompetent.
Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the back
Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the back
House committee requests hearing with postmaster general amid mail-in voting concerns
The House Oversight and Reform Committee on Monday asked Postmaster General Louis DeJoy to answer questions at an upcoming hearing as concerns mount over delivery delays and how they could aff…thehill.com
.Postmaster general, a Trump crony, admits slowing the mail
Trump’s Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, admitted yesterday, in a closed-door meeting with lawmakers, that he is behind the wave of mail delays rolling across the country in recent weeks.
I understand quite clearly what that poster meant. Why don't you?
You said no tax dollars go there. Were you lying, or was the twat?Your incompetence has left you adrift yet again.You said no tax dollars go there. Were you lying, or was the twat?
I gave you the answer, dope.
If no taxpayer dollars fund them, Republicans can't defund them.
Don't tell the twat.Your incompetence makes you appear retarded.If no taxpayer dollars fund them, Republicans can't defund them.
Don't tell the twat.
I've given you everything you need to understand what you should already know.
He was referring to people voting multiple times, not multiple people voting, dumb ass. You're a liar, you know that
You are the liar. Republicans know the greater the turnout the less chance they have of winning.
Actually you're lying. That isn't what my post was about, it doesn't respond to what I said
So the question to address in the thread: Should one party be able to unilaterally be able to change the basic rules of the game over the objections of the other party?
Yes, within reason. Voting is a matter controlled by the state within guidelines set by the U.S. Constitution. If both governor and legislature of the state are controlled by one political party then of course they have leeway to some extent on voting procedures. However, the judicial branch of government is there to act upon any objection based on injustice.
For example, I'm sure the Democrats would follow through with a lawsuit if the GOP here in Arizona had passed a law this past Spring requiring mail-in voting as the only means to vote in yesterday's primary and this November's general election. I'm pretty sure the court would agree that it disenfranchises a good number of Native-American voters living on reservations on roads with no names where mail delivery is problematic at best.
Thank you! One of the few people who made an actual attempt to answer the question.
My question doesn't really specify the Federal level. I wanted to point that out. I don't think new rules should be rammed down either party's throat against their objections at the State or Federal level.
If Democrats really believed in democracy, this is the last thing they would do. Think about it. Democracy relies on that when you lose, you accept the results because the process was fair.
Doesn't that bother you? That ballots are being mailed all the hell over and half the country thinks that's not a valid way to determine who won an election? It is just part of ending belief in the American system
Again these are not new rules. Nevada has had absentee balloting in place for a long time. Mail in balloting has been in place for some time. Worth noting that many stateas run by Republicans have refused to allow voters to even vote absentee without excuses. You are not concerned about the fact that Republicans are ignoring Democrats.
There is no evidence that ballots are beingt mailed willy nilly. A big majority support mail in balloting. You are in the clear minority.
OK, so just to be clear. Your standard is that if any Democrat anywhere agrees to something, that is binding on you that you agreed to it. That's what you're arguing. That's just stupid
You are stupid. Your whole argument is stupid. Nevada has had absentee balloting for some time. Mail in balloting is not that much different. They certainly have safeguards in place to prevent fraud.
You're an imbecile. The issue is not absentee ballots. The issue is mailing out unsolicited ballots.
Listen you stupid schmuck. You write one post after another that misses the point and doesn't address anything I said. If you're going to dump your bile allover the board, at least FOLLOW THE DISCUSSION.
I've only ever put one person on ignore for pure stupidity and having a complete and utter inability to follow a discussion or address anything that I actually said. That was DanielPalos on this board. You're becoming a candidate to be number two.
Write your stupid, moronic, leftist bile and I'll respond. But again, ADDRESS WHAT I SAID
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Biden and his campaign know that if Biden demonstrates his obvious dementia in the debates its a massive game changer.
How is mail in voting a new system?
Because in the past you had to ask for a ballot. They didn't just send out ballots to everyone alive or dead they can imagine.
You didn't know that? Seriously? Where have you been, Antarctica?That's your imagination, dope.They didn't just send out ballots to everyone alive or dead they can imagine.
Bull shit, you made that up and you're completely wrong.
People die, they don't remove them from the voter registration rolls, they mail them a ballot. Anyone who gets that ballot can fill it out and mail it in. The person they voted for won't object. Can you think of why they won't object? LOL?
You don't understand that? How stupid are you?
1. Are you saying the Republicans doesn’t do that? Or both.
2. Show us evidence that MASSIVE mail in voter fraud existed, results and years.
I don't want either party to be able to do that
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.
Churchgoers turn their backs on Bloomberg in protest during his remarks at service in Selma
A group of churchgoers turned their backs on Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg as he spoke at Brown Chapel AME Church, a historic black church in Selma, Ala., on Sunday.Foota…thehill.com
The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.
Hilarious!!!
He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.
View attachment 372975
Poll: Sanders Leads The Field, Bloomberg Qualifies For His 1st Debate
The survey by NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist gives the former New York mayor enough polls showing him over 10% nationally to be on stage for the next Democratic debate Wednesday in Nevada.www.npr.org
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST
It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.
Churchgoers turn their backs on Bloomberg in protest during his remarks at service in Selma
A group of churchgoers turned their backs on Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg as he spoke at Brown Chapel AME Church, a historic black church in Selma, Ala., on Sunday.Foota…
The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.
Hilarious!!!
He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.
View attachment 372975
Poll: Sanders Leads The Field, Bloomberg Qualifies For His 1st Debate
The survey by NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist gives the former New York mayor enough polls showing him over 10% nationally to be on stage for the next Democratic debate Wednesday in Nevada.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST
It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”
You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
That was before Biden exposed himself as a massive racist...Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.
Churchgoers turn their backs on Bloomberg in protest during his remarks at service in Selma
A group of churchgoers turned their backs on Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg as he spoke at Brown Chapel AME Church, a historic black church in Selma, Ala., on Sunday.Foota…
The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.
Hilarious!!!
He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.
View attachment 372975
Poll: Sanders Leads The Field, Bloomberg Qualifies For His 1st Debate
The survey by NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist gives the former New York mayor enough polls showing him over 10% nationally to be on stage for the next Democratic debate Wednesday in Nevada.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST
It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”
You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg.
By what margin?
The debate had nothing to do with it.
No kidding.
A tiny minority? Entire states vote exclusively by mail and have for years. In 2016 over 20% of all votes were cast by mail.That method has always been for a tiny minority and not the total voting public.So what you're saying is that absentee balloting (which Republicans have used for years) is not valid?This is taking a simple and accurate method and turning it into an agenda fulfilling nightmare.
“Expert analysis of each signature” would take many many months.
Libs don’t want results from this election because they fear the result.
223K Clark County NV Mail Ballots Went to Wrong Addresses in 2020 Primary
County Returns: 17% of Clark County Voter Roll Shows Wrong Addresses
That is not evidence of fraud.
That is not evidence of fraud.
It's evidence that mailing ballots out to everyone would be a huge fuck up.
No it would not. Several states have done it for years.
Yup. With huge numbers of lost or spoiled ballots.
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.
Churchgoers turn their backs on Bloomberg in protest during his remarks at service in Selma
A group of churchgoers turned their backs on Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg as he spoke at Brown Chapel AME Church, a historic black church in Selma, Ala., on Sunday.Foota…
The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.
Hilarious!!!
He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.
View attachment 372975
Poll: Sanders Leads The Field, Bloomberg Qualifies For His 1st Debate
The survey by NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist gives the former New York mayor enough polls showing him over 10% nationally to be on stage for the next Democratic debate Wednesday in Nevada.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST
It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”
You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg.
By what margin?
The debate had nothing to do with it.
No kidding.
It is if they were votesA tiny minority? Entire states vote exclusively by mail and have for years. In 2016 over 20% of all votes were cast by mail.That method has always been for a tiny minority and not the total voting public.So what you're saying is that absentee balloting (which Republicans have used for years) is not valid?This is taking a simple and accurate method and turning it into an agenda fulfilling nightmare.
“Expert analysis of each signature” would take many many months.
Libs don’t want results from this election because they fear the result.
223K Clark County NV Mail Ballots Went to Wrong Addresses in 2020 Primary
County Returns: 17% of Clark County Voter Roll Shows Wrong Addresses
That is not evidence of fraud.
Have you clowns figured out why the Democrats picked the specific - very late - date they did for the 1st debate?
The 1st debate is scheduled for AFTER mail-in voting starts. So Biden can stumble, stutter, forget where he is, declare he hates all blacks and honestly declare Dems only pretend to like Latinos for their votes, and the ballots already cast can't be changed.
Trump can talk about suburban housewives, the head coach of Alabama Lou Saban and honestly say he hates everyone except white males. There is absolutely no reason why people should not be able to vote before the first debate if they have made up their mind. No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
No debate has changed the outcome since the 60s and maybe the 70s.
Tell that to Dem nominee Michael Bloomberg.
Thedebates did not hurt Bloomberg. It was his inability to win the black vote. When he went to a black church, the parishioners made their views known.
Churchgoers turn their backs on Bloomberg in protest during his remarks at service in Selma
A group of churchgoers turned their backs on Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg as he spoke at Brown Chapel AME Church, a historic black church in Selma, Ala., on Sunday.Foota…
The debates did not hurt Bloomberg.
Hilarious!!!
He was in second place before and irrelevent after the first debate.
Dropped out 2 weeks later.
Despite spending nearly a billion dollars.
View attachment 372975
Poll: Sanders Leads The Field, Bloomberg Qualifies For His 1st Debate
The survey by NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist gives the former New York mayor enough polls showing him over 10% nationally to be on stage for the next Democratic debate Wednesday in Nevada.
Feb. 20, 2020 at 12:19 p.m. CST
It took only minutes for the pummeling of former New York mayor Mike Bloomberg to commence at Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate. “I’d like to talk about who we’re running against, a billionaire who calls women ‘fat broads’ and ‘horse-faced lesbians,’” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) declared. “And, no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.”
You really believe that. Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg. The debate had nothing to do with it.
Black voters in SC voted for Biden over Bloomberg.
By what margin?
The debate had nothing to do with it.
No kidding.
The black vote was 56% of the total in SC and 61% voted for Biden compared to 17 for Sanders. Bloomberg had major issues among black voters. When he attended a black church to speak the congregation turned their backs on him. That had nothing to do with the debate. Also Sanders winning in NH and Nevada united white voters behind Biden.
