What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

MAGA—More Are Getting Arrested.

Status
Not open for further replies.

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
140,781
Reaction score
31,192
Points
2,180

Love it.
I'm not exactly thrilled that it was an active duty Marine...

I was a tad surprised when the Officer was arrested. What this does, however, is to prove how fed up AMERICANS are with this bullshit "government". This man put his career on the line to express his outrage - and it has cost him dearly. However, he was willing to pay the price. He is now "branded" with the lies of this "government"

He is no more a "domestic terrorist" than I am. My only regret (as a retired Army CWO) is that I am so damned old and infirmed that I could not be there by his side.

Now, you snowflake son-of-a-bitches can kiss my Lilly white patriotic ass.
What a pity they're too fed up because they fell for the lies spoon fed them by Trump.
Poor ignorant snowflake.....
LOL

Only you dupes fell for his lies. America had enough and kicked him to the curb. And they handed control of the House AND Senate over to Democrats.

tenor.gif
You mean the Democrats conducted a swindle.
Nope. And why am I still waiting for you to quote the Constitution where it empowers the vice president to unilaterally reject electoral votes...?

You said Trump didn't lie. If you're right, then it must be in the Constitution. Common, fucking moron, pony up....
I don't know. Why are you waiting? It does empower Congress to reject the electoral votes of any state.
Thst's not what I said, fucking moron. I said Trump's lie spurred them on.

You denied he lied.

Now you demonstrate you're the liar by denying he lied since you obviously can't show where the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors -- which is what Trump asked Pence to do.

You're caught lying again. It's not the first time nor will it be the last.
When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?

You seem to be having trouble connecting anything I've said to your complaint.
When you said Trump didn't lie. Trump claimed that.

Your refusal to show Trump was telling the truth is a tacit confession from you that Trump lied.
Please quote Trump saying that.
You're as dumb as they come, fucking moron. Earlier, you denied any of the mob threatened Mike Pence on Insurrection Day. Now you're denying Trump said Pence could unilaterally reject electoral slates the states sent to Congress.

    • "All Vice President Pence has to do is send it [electoral votes] back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people."


    • "And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution."
    • "They want to recertify. But the only way that can happen is if Mike Pence agrees to send it back. Mike Pence has to agree to send it back."
    • "And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you're not, I'm going to be very disappointed in you. I will tell you right now. I'm not hearing good stories."
    • "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify."

<YAWN!>

When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?
If I may jump is with a question. Do you recognize that Trump was drilling Pence to do just that and rallied his followers to apply more pressure... you saw all of that on Jan 6, right? Thoughts?
Fucking moron has proved today he's oblivious to reality.

According to him, that mob didn't storm the Capitol chanting, "hang Mike Pence" and Trump didn't implore Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes; which is in violation of the Constitution.
Haha, I’m not surprised that he lives in his own reality, that’s the type of person he is. I remember watching that speech by Trump Live. When he started in on Pence I texted my friends and family and told them that Trump just threw his VP under the bus and shit was about to go down. An hour later the capital was being raided. It was unbelievable! Now these turds are denying that any of this happened.... it’s all on video!!! Idiots
Yup. On another thread, some trumperhumper called me a coward for pointing out Pence had to be escorted out of the Capitol because Trump's mob invaded.

These people are beyond insane. Seems trying to minimize storming the U.S. Capitol by comparing it with BLM riots must have failed them. Now they're shifting into abject denial about Insurrection Day.

What else (exactly) should they be compared to then? The Watts riots of the late 60s? If you are under the impression that blacks have recently began "rioting" I have news for you - you are wrong.

Just a partial list:

Cambridge, Maryland Riot, 1963
The Harlem Race Riot, 1964
Rochester Rebellion, 1964
Jersey City Uprising, 1964
Paterson, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Elizabeth, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Chicago (Dixmoor) Riots, 1964
Philadelphia Race Riot, 1964
Watts Rebellion (Los Angeles), 1965
Cleveland’s Hough Riots, 1966
Chicago, Illinois Uprising, 1966
The Dayton, Ohio Uprising, 1966
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco Uprising, 1966
The Nashville Race Riot, 1967
Tampa Bay Race Riot, 1967
Newark Race Riot, 1967
Plainfield, New Jersey Riot, 1967
Detroit Race Riot, 1967
Flint, Michigan Riot, 1967
Tucson Race Riot, 1967
Grand Rapids, Michigan Uprising, 1967
The King Assassination Riots, 1968
Hartford, Connecticut Riot, 1969
Asbury Park Race Riot, 1970
Camden, New Jersey Riots, 1969 and 1971
Miami (Liberty City) Riot, 1980
Crown Heights (Brooklyn) New York Riot, 1991
Rodney King Riot, 1992
West Las Vegas Riot, 1992
St. Petersburg, Florida Riot, 1996

College Campus Violence​

University of Georgia Desegregation Riot, 1961
Ole Miss Riot, 1962
Houston (Texas Southern University) Riot, 1967
Orangeburg Massacre, 1968
Jackson State Killings, 1970

But hell, one "riot" caused by patriotic Americans and you snowflakes go ape-shit.
Unless you compare it to the exact same thing, the FAUX will attack it. Of course, no two events in history are exactly the same. This is the game that weasels like him play.
LOL

Or, fucking moron, you can compare storming the Capitol to get the losing candidate of the election installed as president despite losing the election -- with another such event.

Obviously you can't, so you try to compare it with something else.
Thanks for proving what I said.
No problem, fucking moron. There was nothing else to compare the storming of the U.S. Capitol except the last time it was stormed.
All you are doing is arranging the terms of the debate so no other evidence counts. You only prove that you're a douchebag.
Fucking moron, other events aren't evidence of Insurrection Day.
More proof that you're a douchebag. what does "evidence of Insurrection Day" even mean?
It means you're a fucking moron for asking.
Only if you're a delusional moron.
Which you are. Glad we can finally agree on something. :beer:
We agree that you are a delusional moron.
Great, I said we agree that you're a delusional moron and you agree.
Further proof that you are delusional
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
79,494
Reaction score
16,682
Points
2,210

Love it.


Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381
Here, you need this.

victim_card_monopoly.png


You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?
Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.



This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.
So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.


"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.
Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.


Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.
You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.
They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.


Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.
Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid. :lol:


The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.
At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.


Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.


Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?
No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.
Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....
Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’
The only logical conclusion one can reach based on your response, fucking moron, is that you don't understand the meaning of the word, "veracious."

No, fucking moron, Neither Biden nor Harris bailed any of them out. Not one.

Harris contributed to a fund that bails out protestors, so yes she did.

Your denial of the facts is july noted.
She didn't contribute a penny.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
79,494
Reaction score
16,682
Points
2,210

Love it.
I'm not exactly thrilled that it was an active duty Marine...

I was a tad surprised when the Officer was arrested. What this does, however, is to prove how fed up AMERICANS are with this bullshit "government". This man put his career on the line to express his outrage - and it has cost him dearly. However, he was willing to pay the price. He is now "branded" with the lies of this "government"

He is no more a "domestic terrorist" than I am. My only regret (as a retired Army CWO) is that I am so damned old and infirmed that I could not be there by his side.

Now, you snowflake son-of-a-bitches can kiss my Lilly white patriotic ass.
What a pity they're too fed up because they fell for the lies spoon fed them by Trump.
Poor ignorant snowflake.....
LOL

Only you dupes fell for his lies. America had enough and kicked him to the curb. And they handed control of the House AND Senate over to Democrats.

tenor.gif
You mean the Democrats conducted a swindle.
Nope. And why am I still waiting for you to quote the Constitution where it empowers the vice president to unilaterally reject electoral votes...?

You said Trump didn't lie. If you're right, then it must be in the Constitution. Common, fucking moron, pony up....
I don't know. Why are you waiting? It does empower Congress to reject the electoral votes of any state.
Thst's not what I said, fucking moron. I said Trump's lie spurred them on.

You denied he lied.

Now you demonstrate you're the liar by denying he lied since you obviously can't show where the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors -- which is what Trump asked Pence to do.

You're caught lying again. It's not the first time nor will it be the last.
When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?

You seem to be having trouble connecting anything I've said to your complaint.
When you said Trump didn't lie. Trump claimed that.

Your refusal to show Trump was telling the truth is a tacit confession from you that Trump lied.
Please quote Trump saying that.
You're as dumb as they come, fucking moron. Earlier, you denied any of the mob threatened Mike Pence on Insurrection Day. Now you're denying Trump said Pence could unilaterally reject electoral slates the states sent to Congress.

    • "All Vice President Pence has to do is send it [electoral votes] back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people."


    • "And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution."
    • "They want to recertify. But the only way that can happen is if Mike Pence agrees to send it back. Mike Pence has to agree to send it back."
    • "And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you're not, I'm going to be very disappointed in you. I will tell you right now. I'm not hearing good stories."
    • "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify."

<YAWN!>

When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?
If I may jump is with a question. Do you recognize that Trump was drilling Pence to do just that and rallied his followers to apply more pressure... you saw all of that on Jan 6, right? Thoughts?
Fucking moron has proved today he's oblivious to reality.

According to him, that mob didn't storm the Capitol chanting, "hang Mike Pence" and Trump didn't implore Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes; which is in violation of the Constitution.
Haha, I’m not surprised that he lives in his own reality, that’s the type of person he is. I remember watching that speech by Trump Live. When he started in on Pence I texted my friends and family and told them that Trump just threw his VP under the bus and shit was about to go down. An hour later the capital was being raided. It was unbelievable! Now these turds are denying that any of this happened.... it’s all on video!!! Idiots
Yup. On another thread, some trumperhumper called me a coward for pointing out Pence had to be escorted out of the Capitol because Trump's mob invaded.

These people are beyond insane. Seems trying to minimize storming the U.S. Capitol by comparing it with BLM riots must have failed them. Now they're shifting into abject denial about Insurrection Day.

What else (exactly) should they be compared to then? The Watts riots of the late 60s? If you are under the impression that blacks have recently began "rioting" I have news for you - you are wrong.

Just a partial list:

Cambridge, Maryland Riot, 1963
The Harlem Race Riot, 1964
Rochester Rebellion, 1964
Jersey City Uprising, 1964
Paterson, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Elizabeth, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Chicago (Dixmoor) Riots, 1964
Philadelphia Race Riot, 1964
Watts Rebellion (Los Angeles), 1965
Cleveland’s Hough Riots, 1966
Chicago, Illinois Uprising, 1966
The Dayton, Ohio Uprising, 1966
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco Uprising, 1966
The Nashville Race Riot, 1967
Tampa Bay Race Riot, 1967
Newark Race Riot, 1967
Plainfield, New Jersey Riot, 1967
Detroit Race Riot, 1967
Flint, Michigan Riot, 1967
Tucson Race Riot, 1967
Grand Rapids, Michigan Uprising, 1967
The King Assassination Riots, 1968
Hartford, Connecticut Riot, 1969
Asbury Park Race Riot, 1970
Camden, New Jersey Riots, 1969 and 1971
Miami (Liberty City) Riot, 1980
Crown Heights (Brooklyn) New York Riot, 1991
Rodney King Riot, 1992
West Las Vegas Riot, 1992
St. Petersburg, Florida Riot, 1996

College Campus Violence​

University of Georgia Desegregation Riot, 1961
Ole Miss Riot, 1962
Houston (Texas Southern University) Riot, 1967
Orangeburg Massacre, 1968
Jackson State Killings, 1970

But hell, one "riot" caused by patriotic Americans and you snowflakes go ape-shit.
Unless you compare it to the exact same thing, the FAUX will attack it. Of course, no two events in history are exactly the same. This is the game that weasels like him play.
LOL

Or, fucking moron, you can compare storming the Capitol to get the losing candidate of the election installed as president despite losing the election -- with another such event.

Obviously you can't, so you try to compare it with something else.
Thanks for proving what I said.
No problem, fucking moron. There was nothing else to compare the storming of the U.S. Capitol except the last time it was stormed.
All you are doing is arranging the terms of the debate so no other evidence counts. You only prove that you're a douchebag.
Fucking moron, other events aren't evidence of Insurrection Day.
More proof that you're a douchebag. what does "evidence of Insurrection Day" even mean?
It means you're a fucking moron for asking.
Only if you're a delusional moron.
Which you are. Glad we can finally agree on something. :beer:
We agree that you are a delusional moron.
Great, I said we agree that you're a delusional moron and you agree.
Further proof that you are delusional
Spits the forum dolt who's arguing about Insurrection Day yet didn't know some in the mob were chanting, "hang Mike Pence," and didn't know Trump wanted Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
84,957
Reaction score
29,199
Points
2,280
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.

Love it.
I'm not exactly thrilled that it was an active duty Marine...

I was a tad surprised when the Officer was arrested. What this does, however, is to prove how fed up AMERICANS are with this bullshit "government". This man put his career on the line to express his outrage - and it has cost him dearly. However, he was willing to pay the price. He is now "branded" with the lies of this "government"

He is no more a "domestic terrorist" than I am. My only regret (as a retired Army CWO) is that I am so damned old and infirmed that I could not be there by his side.

Now, you snowflake son-of-a-bitches can kiss my Lilly white patriotic ass.
What a pity they're too fed up because they fell for the lies spoon fed them by Trump.
Poor ignorant snowflake.....
LOL

Only you dupes fell for his lies. America had enough and kicked him to the curb. And they handed control of the House AND Senate over to Democrats.

tenor.gif
You mean the Democrats conducted a swindle.
Nope. And why am I still waiting for you to quote the Constitution where it empowers the vice president to unilaterally reject electoral votes...?

You said Trump didn't lie. If you're right, then it must be in the Constitution. Common, fucking moron, pony up....
I don't know. Why are you waiting? It does empower Congress to reject the electoral votes of any state.
Thst's not what I said, fucking moron. I said Trump's lie spurred them on.

You denied he lied.

Now you demonstrate you're the liar by denying he lied since you obviously can't show where the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors -- which is what Trump asked Pence to do.

You're caught lying again. It's not the first time nor will it be the last.
When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?

You seem to be having trouble connecting anything I've said to your complaint.
When you said Trump didn't lie. Trump claimed that.

Your refusal to show Trump was telling the truth is a tacit confession from you that Trump lied.
Please quote Trump saying that.
You're as dumb as they come, fucking moron. Earlier, you denied any of the mob threatened Mike Pence on Insurrection Day. Now you're denying Trump said Pence could unilaterally reject electoral slates the states sent to Congress.

    • "All Vice President Pence has to do is send it [electoral votes] back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people."


    • "And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution."
    • "They want to recertify. But the only way that can happen is if Mike Pence agrees to send it back. Mike Pence has to agree to send it back."
    • "And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you're not, I'm going to be very disappointed in you. I will tell you right now. I'm not hearing good stories."
    • "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify."

<YAWN!>

When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?
If I may jump is with a question. Do you recognize that Trump was drilling Pence to do just that and rallied his followers to apply more pressure... you saw all of that on Jan 6, right? Thoughts?
Fucking moron has proved today he's oblivious to reality.

According to him, that mob didn't storm the Capitol chanting, "hang Mike Pence" and Trump didn't implore Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes; which is in violation of the Constitution.
Haha, I’m not surprised that he lives in his own reality, that’s the type of person he is. I remember watching that speech by Trump Live. When he started in on Pence I texted my friends and family and told them that Trump just threw his VP under the bus and shit was about to go down. An hour later the capital was being raided. It was unbelievable! Now these turds are denying that any of this happened.... it’s all on video!!! Idiots
Yup. On another thread, some trumperhumper called me a coward for pointing out Pence had to be escorted out of the Capitol because Trump's mob invaded.

These people are beyond insane. Seems trying to minimize storming the U.S. Capitol by comparing it with BLM riots must have failed them. Now they're shifting into abject denial about Insurrection Day.

What else (exactly) should they be compared to then? The Watts riots of the late 60s? If you are under the impression that blacks have recently began "rioting" I have news for you - you are wrong.

Just a partial list:

Cambridge, Maryland Riot, 1963
The Harlem Race Riot, 1964
Rochester Rebellion, 1964
Jersey City Uprising, 1964
Paterson, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Elizabeth, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Chicago (Dixmoor) Riots, 1964
Philadelphia Race Riot, 1964
Watts Rebellion (Los Angeles), 1965
Cleveland’s Hough Riots, 1966
Chicago, Illinois Uprising, 1966
The Dayton, Ohio Uprising, 1966
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco Uprising, 1966
The Nashville Race Riot, 1967
Tampa Bay Race Riot, 1967
Newark Race Riot, 1967
Plainfield, New Jersey Riot, 1967
Detroit Race Riot, 1967
Flint, Michigan Riot, 1967
Tucson Race Riot, 1967
Grand Rapids, Michigan Uprising, 1967
The King Assassination Riots, 1968
Hartford, Connecticut Riot, 1969
Asbury Park Race Riot, 1970
Camden, New Jersey Riots, 1969 and 1971
Miami (Liberty City) Riot, 1980
Crown Heights (Brooklyn) New York Riot, 1991
Rodney King Riot, 1992
West Las Vegas Riot, 1992
St. Petersburg, Florida Riot, 1996

College Campus Violence​

University of Georgia Desegregation Riot, 1961
Ole Miss Riot, 1962
Houston (Texas Southern University) Riot, 1967
Orangeburg Massacre, 1968
Jackson State Killings, 1970

But hell, one "riot" caused by patriotic Americans and you snowflakes go ape-shit.
Unless you compare it to the exact same thing, the FAUX will attack it. Of course, no two events in history are exactly the same. This is the game that weasels like him play.
LOL

Or, fucking moron, you can compare storming the Capitol to get the losing candidate of the election installed as president despite losing the election -- with another such event.

Obviously you can't, so you try to compare it with something else.
Thanks for proving what I said.
No problem, fucking moron. There was nothing else to compare the storming of the U.S. Capitol except the last time it was stormed.
All you are doing is arranging the terms of the debate so no other evidence counts. You only prove that you're a douchebag.
Fucking moron, other events aren't evidence of Insurrection Day.
More proof that you're a douchebag. what does "evidence of Insurrection Day" even mean?
It means you're a fucking moron for asking.
Only if you're a delusional moron.
Which you are. Glad we can finally agree on something. :beer:
We agree that you are a delusional moron.
Great, I said we agree that you're a delusional moron and you agree.
Further proof that you are delusional
Spits the forum dolt who's arguing about Insurrection Day yet didn't know some in the mob were chanting, "hang Mike Pence," and didn't know Trump wanted Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes.
There's so much they're not told.
 

InspectorDetector

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
750
Reaction score
842
Points
883
So Faun doesn't like protests if the people protesting are Republicans.
Peacefully protesting is fine. Not the violence we saw on Jan 6.

The problem with your statement (and yes, I agree with it) is that we have been shown, Time after time, that the "powers that be" merely sit back on their fat asses and laugh at us.

You want some sort of "action " - look at the history of the Blacks. The Greasy wheel gets the grease - or haven't you heard?
 

XponentialChaos

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
10,816
Reaction score
3,849
Points
210
So Faun doesn't like protests if the people protesting are Republicans.
Peacefully protesting is fine. Not the violence we saw on Jan 6.

The problem with your statement (and yes, I agree with it) is that we have been shown, Time after time, that the "powers that be" merely sit back on their fat asses and laugh at us.

You want some sort of "action " - look at the history of the Blacks. The Greasy wheel gets the grease - or haven't you heard?
Sorry. But I don’t support violent riots.

What “action” resulted from those idiots who got themselves arrested? Biden is still their president.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
140,781
Reaction score
31,192
Points
2,180

Love it.
I'm not exactly thrilled that it was an active duty Marine...

I was a tad surprised when the Officer was arrested. What this does, however, is to prove how fed up AMERICANS are with this bullshit "government". This man put his career on the line to express his outrage - and it has cost him dearly. However, he was willing to pay the price. He is now "branded" with the lies of this "government"

He is no more a "domestic terrorist" than I am. My only regret (as a retired Army CWO) is that I am so damned old and infirmed that I could not be there by his side.

Now, you snowflake son-of-a-bitches can kiss my Lilly white patriotic ass.
What a pity they're too fed up because they fell for the lies spoon fed them by Trump.
Poor ignorant snowflake.....
LOL

Only you dupes fell for his lies. America had enough and kicked him to the curb. And they handed control of the House AND Senate over to Democrats.

tenor.gif
You mean the Democrats conducted a swindle.
Nope. And why am I still waiting for you to quote the Constitution where it empowers the vice president to unilaterally reject electoral votes...?

You said Trump didn't lie. If you're right, then it must be in the Constitution. Common, fucking moron, pony up....
I don't know. Why are you waiting? It does empower Congress to reject the electoral votes of any state.
Thst's not what I said, fucking moron. I said Trump's lie spurred them on.

You denied he lied.

Now you demonstrate you're the liar by denying he lied since you obviously can't show where the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors -- which is what Trump asked Pence to do.

You're caught lying again. It's not the first time nor will it be the last.
When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?

You seem to be having trouble connecting anything I've said to your complaint.
When you said Trump didn't lie. Trump claimed that.

Your refusal to show Trump was telling the truth is a tacit confession from you that Trump lied.
Please quote Trump saying that.
You're as dumb as they come, fucking moron. Earlier, you denied any of the mob threatened Mike Pence on Insurrection Day. Now you're denying Trump said Pence could unilaterally reject electoral slates the states sent to Congress.

    • "All Vice President Pence has to do is send it [electoral votes] back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people."


    • "And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution."
    • "They want to recertify. But the only way that can happen is if Mike Pence agrees to send it back. Mike Pence has to agree to send it back."
    • "And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you're not, I'm going to be very disappointed in you. I will tell you right now. I'm not hearing good stories."
    • "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify."

<YAWN!>

When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?
If I may jump is with a question. Do you recognize that Trump was drilling Pence to do just that and rallied his followers to apply more pressure... you saw all of that on Jan 6, right? Thoughts?
Fucking moron has proved today he's oblivious to reality.

According to him, that mob didn't storm the Capitol chanting, "hang Mike Pence" and Trump didn't implore Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes; which is in violation of the Constitution.
Haha, I’m not surprised that he lives in his own reality, that’s the type of person he is. I remember watching that speech by Trump Live. When he started in on Pence I texted my friends and family and told them that Trump just threw his VP under the bus and shit was about to go down. An hour later the capital was being raided. It was unbelievable! Now these turds are denying that any of this happened.... it’s all on video!!! Idiots
Yup. On another thread, some trumperhumper called me a coward for pointing out Pence had to be escorted out of the Capitol because Trump's mob invaded.

These people are beyond insane. Seems trying to minimize storming the U.S. Capitol by comparing it with BLM riots must have failed them. Now they're shifting into abject denial about Insurrection Day.

What else (exactly) should they be compared to then? The Watts riots of the late 60s? If you are under the impression that blacks have recently began "rioting" I have news for you - you are wrong.

Just a partial list:

Cambridge, Maryland Riot, 1963
The Harlem Race Riot, 1964
Rochester Rebellion, 1964
Jersey City Uprising, 1964
Paterson, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Elizabeth, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Chicago (Dixmoor) Riots, 1964
Philadelphia Race Riot, 1964
Watts Rebellion (Los Angeles), 1965
Cleveland’s Hough Riots, 1966
Chicago, Illinois Uprising, 1966
The Dayton, Ohio Uprising, 1966
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco Uprising, 1966
The Nashville Race Riot, 1967
Tampa Bay Race Riot, 1967
Newark Race Riot, 1967
Plainfield, New Jersey Riot, 1967
Detroit Race Riot, 1967
Flint, Michigan Riot, 1967
Tucson Race Riot, 1967
Grand Rapids, Michigan Uprising, 1967
The King Assassination Riots, 1968
Hartford, Connecticut Riot, 1969
Asbury Park Race Riot, 1970
Camden, New Jersey Riots, 1969 and 1971
Miami (Liberty City) Riot, 1980
Crown Heights (Brooklyn) New York Riot, 1991
Rodney King Riot, 1992
West Las Vegas Riot, 1992
St. Petersburg, Florida Riot, 1996

College Campus Violence​

University of Georgia Desegregation Riot, 1961
Ole Miss Riot, 1962
Houston (Texas Southern University) Riot, 1967
Orangeburg Massacre, 1968
Jackson State Killings, 1970

But hell, one "riot" caused by patriotic Americans and you snowflakes go ape-shit.
Unless you compare it to the exact same thing, the FAUX will attack it. Of course, no two events in history are exactly the same. This is the game that weasels like him play.
LOL

Or, fucking moron, you can compare storming the Capitol to get the losing candidate of the election installed as president despite losing the election -- with another such event.

Obviously you can't, so you try to compare it with something else.
Thanks for proving what I said.
No problem, fucking moron. There was nothing else to compare the storming of the U.S. Capitol except the last time it was stormed.
All you are doing is arranging the terms of the debate so no other evidence counts. You only prove that you're a douchebag.
Fucking moron, other events aren't evidence of Insurrection Day.
More proof that you're a douchebag. what does "evidence of Insurrection Day" even mean?
It means you're a fucking moron for asking.
Only if you're a delusional moron.
Which you are. Glad we can finally agree on something. :beer:
We agree that you are a delusional moron.
Great, I said we agree that you're a delusional moron and you agree.
Further proof that you are delusional
Spits the forum dolt who's arguing about Insurrection Day yet didn't know some in the mob were chanting, "hang Mike Pence," and didn't know Trump wanted Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes.
I've heard turds like you make such a claim, but I've never seen any video. That's all I said. As for Trump's communications with Pence, I have never seen the exact wording.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
140,781
Reaction score
31,192
Points
2,180

Love it.


Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381
Here, you need this.

victim_card_monopoly.png


You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?
Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.



This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.
So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.


"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.
Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.


Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.
You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.
They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.


Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.
Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid. :lol:


The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.
At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.


Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.


Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?
No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.
Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....
Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’
The only logical conclusion one can reach based on your response, fucking moron, is that you don't understand the meaning of the word, "veracious."

No, fucking moron, Neither Biden nor Harris bailed any of them out. Not one.

Harris contributed to a fund that bails out protestors, so yes she did.

Your denial of the facts is july noted.
She didn't contribute a penny.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:
Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did
 

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
41,850
Reaction score
7,163
Points
1,840

Love it.
I'm not exactly thrilled that it was an active duty Marine...

I was a tad surprised when the Officer was arrested. What this does, however, is to prove how fed up AMERICANS are with this bullshit "government". This man put his career on the line to express his outrage - and it has cost him dearly. However, he was willing to pay the price. He is now "branded" with the lies of this "government"

He is no more a "domestic terrorist" than I am. My only regret (as a retired Army CWO) is that I am so damned old and infirmed that I could not be there by his side.

Now, you snowflake son-of-a-bitches can kiss my Lilly white patriotic ass.
What a pity they're too fed up because they fell for the lies spoon fed them by Trump.
Poor ignorant snowflake.....
LOL

Only you dupes fell for his lies. America had enough and kicked him to the curb. And they handed control of the House AND Senate over to Democrats.

tenor.gif
You mean the Democrats conducted a swindle.
Nope. And why am I still waiting for you to quote the Constitution where it empowers the vice president to unilaterally reject electoral votes...?

You said Trump didn't lie. If you're right, then it must be in the Constitution. Common, fucking moron, pony up....
I don't know. Why are you waiting? It does empower Congress to reject the electoral votes of any state.
Thst's not what I said, fucking moron. I said Trump's lie spurred them on.

You denied he lied.

Now you demonstrate you're the liar by denying he lied since you obviously can't show where the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors -- which is what Trump asked Pence to do.

You're caught lying again. It's not the first time nor will it be the last.
When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?

You seem to be having trouble connecting anything I've said to your complaint.
When you said Trump didn't lie. Trump claimed that.

Your refusal to show Trump was telling the truth is a tacit confession from you that Trump lied.
Please quote Trump saying that.
You're as dumb as they come, fucking moron. Earlier, you denied any of the mob threatened Mike Pence on Insurrection Day. Now you're denying Trump said Pence could unilaterally reject electoral slates the states sent to Congress.

    • "All Vice President Pence has to do is send it [electoral votes] back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people."


    • "And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution."
    • "They want to recertify. But the only way that can happen is if Mike Pence agrees to send it back. Mike Pence has to agree to send it back."
    • "And Mike Pence, I hope you're going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country. And if you're not, I'm going to be very disappointed in you. I will tell you right now. I'm not hearing good stories."
    • "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify."

<YAWN!>

When did I claim that the Constitution gives the VP the authority to unilaterally reject slates of electors?
If I may jump is with a question. Do you recognize that Trump was drilling Pence to do just that and rallied his followers to apply more pressure... you saw all of that on Jan 6, right? Thoughts?
Fucking moron has proved today he's oblivious to reality.

According to him, that mob didn't storm the Capitol chanting, "hang Mike Pence" and Trump didn't implore Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes; which is in violation of the Constitution.
Haha, I’m not surprised that he lives in his own reality, that’s the type of person he is. I remember watching that speech by Trump Live. When he started in on Pence I texted my friends and family and told them that Trump just threw his VP under the bus and shit was about to go down. An hour later the capital was being raided. It was unbelievable! Now these turds are denying that any of this happened.... it’s all on video!!! Idiots
Yup. On another thread, some trumperhumper called me a coward for pointing out Pence had to be escorted out of the Capitol because Trump's mob invaded.

These people are beyond insane. Seems trying to minimize storming the U.S. Capitol by comparing it with BLM riots must have failed them. Now they're shifting into abject denial about Insurrection Day.

What else (exactly) should they be compared to then? The Watts riots of the late 60s? If you are under the impression that blacks have recently began "rioting" I have news for you - you are wrong.

Just a partial list:

Cambridge, Maryland Riot, 1963
The Harlem Race Riot, 1964
Rochester Rebellion, 1964
Jersey City Uprising, 1964
Paterson, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Elizabeth, New Jersey Uprising, 1964
Chicago (Dixmoor) Riots, 1964
Philadelphia Race Riot, 1964
Watts Rebellion (Los Angeles), 1965
Cleveland’s Hough Riots, 1966
Chicago, Illinois Uprising, 1966
The Dayton, Ohio Uprising, 1966
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco Uprising, 1966
The Nashville Race Riot, 1967
Tampa Bay Race Riot, 1967
Newark Race Riot, 1967
Plainfield, New Jersey Riot, 1967
Detroit Race Riot, 1967
Flint, Michigan Riot, 1967
Tucson Race Riot, 1967
Grand Rapids, Michigan Uprising, 1967
The King Assassination Riots, 1968
Hartford, Connecticut Riot, 1969
Asbury Park Race Riot, 1970
Camden, New Jersey Riots, 1969 and 1971
Miami (Liberty City) Riot, 1980
Crown Heights (Brooklyn) New York Riot, 1991
Rodney King Riot, 1992
West Las Vegas Riot, 1992
St. Petersburg, Florida Riot, 1996

College Campus Violence​

University of Georgia Desegregation Riot, 1961
Ole Miss Riot, 1962
Houston (Texas Southern University) Riot, 1967
Orangeburg Massacre, 1968
Jackson State Killings, 1970

But hell, one "riot" caused by patriotic Americans and you snowflakes go ape-shit.
Unless you compare it to the exact same thing, the FAUX will attack it. Of course, no two events in history are exactly the same. This is the game that weasels like him play.
LOL

Or, fucking moron, you can compare storming the Capitol to get the losing candidate of the election installed as president despite losing the election -- with another such event.

Obviously you can't, so you try to compare it with something else.
Thanks for proving what I said.
No problem, fucking moron. There was nothing else to compare the storming of the U.S. Capitol except the last time it was stormed.
All you are doing is arranging the terms of the debate so no other evidence counts. You only prove that you're a douchebag.
Fucking moron, other events aren't evidence of Insurrection Day.
More proof that you're a douchebag. what does "evidence of Insurrection Day" even mean?
It means you're a fucking moron for asking.
Only if you're a delusional moron.
Which you are. Glad we can finally agree on something. :beer:
We agree that you are a delusional moron.
Great, I said we agree that you're a delusional moron and you agree.
Further proof that you are delusional
Spits the forum dolt who's arguing about Insurrection Day yet didn't know some in the mob were chanting, "hang Mike Pence," and didn't know Trump wanted Pence to unilaterally reject electoral votes.
I've heard turds like you make such a claim, but I've never seen any video. That's all I said. As for Trump's communications with Pence, I have never seen the exact wording.
s
Sounds like you’re taking the ol fingers in the ears tactic. Lalala
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
79,494
Reaction score
16,682
Points
2,210

Love it.


Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381
Here, you need this.

victim_card_monopoly.png


You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?
Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.



This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.
So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.


"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.
Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.


Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.
You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.
They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.


Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.
Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid. :lol:


The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.
At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.


Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.


Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?
No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.
Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....
Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’
The only logical conclusion one can reach based on your response, fucking moron, is that you don't understand the meaning of the word, "veracious."

No, fucking moron, Neither Biden nor Harris bailed any of them out. Not one.

Harris contributed to a fund that bails out protestors, so yes she did.

Your denial of the facts is july noted.
She didn't contribute a penny.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:
Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did
That's fake news, fucking moron.

Again, you demonstrate you don't know the meaning of the word, "veracious."

And again, real news shows she did nothing beyond giving a shout out to the fund on Twitter. At worst, you can say her shout out inspired others to donate.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
140,781
Reaction score
31,192
Points
2,180

Love it.


Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381
Here, you need this.

victim_card_monopoly.png


You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?
Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.



This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.
So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.


"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.
Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.


Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.
You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.
They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.


Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.
Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid. :lol:


The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.
At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.


Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.


Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?
No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.
Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....
Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’
The only logical conclusion one can reach based on your response, fucking moron, is that you don't understand the meaning of the word, "veracious."

No, fucking moron, Neither Biden nor Harris bailed any of them out. Not one.

Harris contributed to a fund that bails out protestors, so yes she did.

Your denial of the facts is july noted.
She didn't contribute a penny.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:
Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did
That's fake news, fucking moron.

Again, you demonstrate you don't know the meaning of the word, "veracious."

And again, real news shows she did nothing beyond giving a shout out to the fund on Twitter. At worst, you can say her shout out inspired others to donate.
Prove it, asshole.
 

InspectorDetector

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
750
Reaction score
842
Points
883
So Faun doesn't like protests if the people protesting are Republicans.
Peacefully protesting is fine. Not the violence we saw on Jan 6.

The problem with your statement (and yes, I agree with it) is that we have been shown, Time after time, that the "powers that be" merely sit back on their fat asses and laugh at us.

You want some sort of "action " - look at the history of the Blacks. The Greasy wheel gets the grease - or haven't you heard?
Sorry. But I don’t support violent riots.

What “action” resulted from those idiots who got themselves arrested? Biden is still their president.

Yet when the blacks cause hundreds of millions of dollars in destruction, somehow, the people of the United States make excuse after excuse for them.

However, when Americans are FED UP with their government and its' corruption, they are labeled as "terrorists".

And I suppose that this makes sense to you........
 

InspectorDetector

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
750
Reaction score
842
Points
883

Yet when the blacks cause hundreds of millions of dollars in destruction, somehow, the people of the United States make excuse after excuse for them.
Take that up with them. I’ve been consistent in my position.

Funny. The fascist left has been "Taking it up with them" for 50 years. We all see where that has gotten us.......................
 

InspectorDetector

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
750
Reaction score
842
Points
883

Funny. The fascist left has been "Taking it up with them" for 50 years. We all see where that has gotten us.......................
Then go storm the Capitol like those other idiots and watch what happens.

Were I still a young man - and not an old man on his last legs - I WOULD have been there and proudly so.

Suddenly, the left is full of passionate outrage against those who would DEMAND change from the corrupt assholes who make up the majority of our "leaders".

The world has surely turned on its axis.............what the hell has happened to us?
 

XponentialChaos

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
10,816
Reaction score
3,849
Points
210

Were I still a young man - and not an old man on his last legs - I WOULD have been there and proudly so.

Suddenly, the left is full of passionate outrage against those who would DEMAND change from the corrupt assholes who make up the majority of our "leaders".

The world has surely turned on its axis.............what the hell has happened to us?
Then have fun doing nothing other than whining on an anonymous message board, “patriot”.

As I already explained, I support PEACEFUL protests. I have absolutely no issue with any criminal getting penalized accordingly for violently rioting.
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
12,281
Reaction score
7,256
Points
928
Location
Texas

Were I still a young man - and not an old man on his last legs - I WOULD have been there and proudly so.

Suddenly, the left is full of passionate outrage against those who would DEMAND change from the corrupt assholes who make up the majority of our "leaders".

The world has surely turned on its axis.............what the hell has happened to us?
Then have fun doing nothing other than whining on an anonymous message board, “patriot”.

As I already explained, I support PEACEFUL protests. I have absolutely no issue with any criminal getting penalized accordingly for violently rioting.
Apparently, you have no issue with some getting penalized and others getting a free pass, depending on their ideology.
 

InspectorDetector

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
750
Reaction score
842
Points
883

Were I still a young man - and not an old man on his last legs - I WOULD have been there and proudly so.

Suddenly, the left is full of passionate outrage against those who would DEMAND change from the corrupt assholes who make up the majority of our "leaders".

The world has surely turned on its axis.............what the hell has happened to us?
Then have fun doing nothing other than whining on an anonymous message board, “patriot”.

As I already explained, I support PEACEFUL protests. I have absolutely no issue with any criminal getting penalized accordingly for violently rioting.


Funny, when I hear the left defending the "government" I simply can not help but remember way back in my College days a poem by WB Yeats:

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?


You people make me laugh....I'd cry if it wasn't so damned reprehensible.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
79,494
Reaction score
16,682
Points
2,210

Love it.


Why are some rioters being gone after with both barrels while others are given a pass or just low priority?


Because the dems are on the side of lefty rioters.



THus, these prosecutions are political.


Anyone convicted, will be a political prisoner.


That is the country you are making.


View attachment 489381
Here, you need this.

victim_card_monopoly.png


You people are engaged in unequal application of the law. That is an injustice. Anyone you do that to, is a victim of your oppression.


Do you support going after ALL the rioters of the last 4 years, with equal fervor?
Got ANY examples? Simply saying it doesn’t make it so. Give me an example of a BLM member, whose identity was known to police, that tazed a cop in the neck anc remained free for weeks, not even arrested. Got examples like that?


Revealed: Meet The Trump Fanatic Who Used A Stun Gun On A Cop At The Capitol Insurrection

Take note of the date. Over a month, almost 2 months after the Trump riot and that guy was still at large. Thankfully he was finally arrested.



This thread, the op is about the massive and aggressive pursuit of the 1/6 rioters. EVERYTHING, I have seen in relation to the other 4 years of rioting from the Left, is that large segments of LE and local and state government was, at best, LAX in pursuit of all the other rioters, if not actively supporting them in their rioting.


I have not bothered to keep lists of examples. Your pretense of being unaware of this is not credible. I am not going to waste time documenting what has been front and center in the media for the last 4 years.
So, as usual, you're full of bovine feces and can't back up the shit you spew.

Yes, the arrests of Trump's mob is more newsworthy than some rioter at a BLM protest that broke a window...Trump's mob stormed the United States capitol. Duh.


"broke a window"?Dozens dead and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, and you minimize it as "broke a window"?


Your support and defense of the use of violent racist mobs for political purposes reveals you to be a dangerous radical and a immoral person.
Just more playing the victim from you...no actual examples of this "unequal application of the law" you claim is occurring. You can't find examples of BLM protesters tazing a cop and being allowed to roam free for months because there is no "unequal application of the law" . Trump's mob isn't being targeted, if anything they are being treated far better than any black or brown person that did the same thing.


Your setting the bar to be an exact match between two crimes retarded.

Thousands of rioters have rioted, violently, destroying property, assaulting people, ect, and been given a pass by people like you.

Your denial of this fact, just shows you to be a bad faith debater nothing more.
You haven't provided anything remotely resembling a fact. You have whined and played the victim but have offered ZERO proof of this alleged victimization. Show us a BLM protester whose identity was known, that roamed free for months after tazing a cop in the neck.

Teh point is the unequal application of justice. They are going after one small group of rioters, from on small riot, FAR more aggressively than the vast majority of rioters of the last four years, because they were not left leaning rioters.


YOur focusing on the detail of known identity is an excuse for you to avoid facing the fact that this is politically motivated, so that thus anyone serving time because of it, will be political prisoners.


REAL injustice is being done in front of you. This is not a fucking micro-aggression or some such shit that you people have been talking shit about for the last 50 years. This is real shit and you are on the wrong side.
They are going after people that broke the law. They are arresting people that broke the law at protests all over the country. Yes, the prosecution of the Trump mob is going to get more press. We all watched the events of January 6th unfold on live TV. We watched our nation's capital swarmed by an angry mob whipped up by a lie. So, yeah, it draws a lot more attention than other protests.

If a BLM protester tazed a cop in the neck and the cops knew who the guy was and where he lived, he wouldn't have walked around free for weeks. There is no unequal application of the law in regards to Trump's mob. I hope they find them all and the worst ones do jail time...from ALL the protests.


Your excuses for the unequal application of the justice does not excuse the violation of their civil rights, nor does it change the fact that anyone convicted by a political prosecution will be thus, a political prisoner.


The "other protests" were far larger and far more deadly and damaging than the one small protest from the right. That your media and your government officials decided to give that one small riot, so much more attention, BECAUSE IT CAME FROM THEIR ENEMIES INSTEAD OF THEIR ALLIES, in a reason, not an excuse, not a justification.


You are either for civil rights or you are not. I want the rioters of 1/6 to be treated the same as all the other rioters of the last 4 years. That would just Just.
Sorry but your "the other side does it more" sniveling whine isn't catching on. The Nation watched in horror as a mob whipped up by a lie invaded the nation's capital. They aren't being unfairly targeted or treated. In fact, most of these violent WHITE protesters were just left to go home and stay free for weeks and then local judges kept letting them go. Took a Federal judge to step in and finally "lock them up". Your victim card expired. Hell, it was never valid. :lol:


The "Nation watched in horror" as your side rioted and killed and burned for 4 years and the media downplayed it and your lib courts let them go.

Your reasons for the unequal application of justice, do not make it any less of a violation of human rights or any less of tyranny.
At the height of the protests for racial justice, the world watched and supported, silly man.


Oh, and "my side" roundly and soundly condemns violence and rioting.


Did you note how, not once, did Biden tell rioters he "loved them"?
No dumbfuck, he and Kameltoe only bailed them out and encouraged them to continue. The world supported you assholes? Never.
Veracious link to them bailing out rioters....
Seven months ago, Kamala Harris bailed out criminal rioters. Now she wants to punish Capitol ‘insurrectionists.’
The only logical conclusion one can reach based on your response, fucking moron, is that you don't understand the meaning of the word, "veracious."

No, fucking moron, Neither Biden nor Harris bailed any of them out. Not one.

Harris contributed to a fund that bails out protestors, so yes she did.

Your denial of the facts is july noted.
She didn't contribute a penny.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:
Kamala Harris and Biden Staffers Donated to Bail Out Folks Arrested During Riots, Here's What One of Them Then Did
That's fake news, fucking moron.

Again, you demonstrate you don't know the meaning of the word, "veracious."

And again, real news shows she did nothing beyond giving a shout out to the fund on Twitter. At worst, you can say her shout out inspired others to donate.
Prove it, asshole.
I already did, fucking moron. I posted a news article. You posted a non-news claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$280.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days