it was a question...but then you're so smart you would know that...
your failure to answer the question speaks volumes, you usually resort to stupid ad homs when you can't answer a question for fear it pokes holes in a comment or theory you made....(yawn)
you asked what if there is no information to be "gotten"....
are you actually suggesting that my question has no bearing or relation to yours? if so, kindly explain why instead of wussing out with your trypical one line ad homs...
lol...you are the one that wussed out by bringing up a non-sequitur to avoid answering the quesiton.
i really hoped you wouldn't wuss out....pity....
it is apparent you have no clue what a non-sequitur is...you said...what if there was nothing to be "gotten"...IOW, you questioned would they still use enhanced techiques even IF there is a chance there is nothing to be "gotten"....asking if you would still incarcerate people KNOWING that innocent people get incarcerated is not a non-sequitur, it is virtually identical and at a minimum, highly analogous. please, stop the bullshit, especially when you don't even understand what the word means....
of course i would still pursue the action, just as we pursue locking people up, sometimes, unfortunately, the innocent are wronged...
now, let's see the brave ravi finally answer the question, given an innocent might go to jail, do you want to do away with incarceration?