Luke Letlow, 41-year-old congressman-elect, dies with COVID-19

[jbrownson0831]

I wonder if this will move any conservative mask deniers to quit acting like idiots? Probably not.

Yes he drowned in his pool but a neighbor had tested positive for Covid.

Looks like it won't!

Facediaper wearing states have the highest mortality rates don't you look at the stats??

And that's the only correlation that pops to mind for you?

No different than any of your rants now is it?

Um, I don't know. I'm just looking for clues in your behaviors.

Statistics are clues to my behavior. You keep yapping science but the stats aren't backing it up.

 

[gtopa1]

will the Dems pick up the seat?

too soon!

Louisiana Congressman-elect Luke Letlow dead from COVID-19

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Luke Letlow, Louisiana's incoming Republican member of the U.S. House, died Tuesday night from complications related to COVID-19 only days before he would have been sworn into office.

apnews.com

“May it be a comfort to Luke’s wife Julia and their children Jeremiah and Jacqueline that so many mourn their loss and are praying for them at this sad time,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

I hope at this sad time that Pelosi means it; doesn't say she gives a damn though.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

We don't. We have them.

You have what, precisely?

God you're an idiot. You asked the question. Seriously, wtf is wrong with you?

Your "response" was vague.

So again: Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Don't you have the balls to provide a clear response?

We have flu shots available everywhere. Usually free.

So that's good enough for COVID? Trumpsters say COVID is just the flu.

Can you say "Warp Speed" without being contemptible?

Greg

 

[Mac1958]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

We don't. We have them.

You have what, precisely?

God you're an idiot. You asked the question. Seriously, wtf is wrong with you?

Your "response" was vague.

So again: Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Don't you have the balls to provide a clear response?

We have flu shots available everywhere. Usually free.

So that's good enough for COVID? Trumpsters say COVID is just the flu.

Can you say "Warp Speed" without being contemptible?

Greg

After the way Trump has behaved during this crisis, no.

 

[Camp]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

We don't. We have them.

You have what, precisely?

God you're an idiot. You asked the question. Seriously, wtf is wrong with you?

Your "response" was vague.

So again: Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Don't you have the balls to provide a clear response?

We have flu shots available everywhere. Usually free.

So that's good enough for COVID? Trumpsters say COVID is just the flu.

Medicine is medicine. Any flu medicine should work fine with the rona virus.

 

[martybegan]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Please re-read your statement and think about it for a second......

 

[martybegan]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

 

[Mac1958]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Please re-read your statement and think about it for a second......

Okay, done!

Now, since COVID is just a Chinese flu, and most of us don't get immunized against the flu, why bother?

 

[Mac1958]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

 

[martybegan]

Why was he not given the vaccine...did he refuse it?

Priority for the Trump vaccine is given to important people like AOC and Pelosi, not the riff-raff of flyover states.

Why do we need a vaccine for a simple flu?

Please re-read your statement and think about it for a second......

Okay, done!

Now, since COVID is just a Chinese flu, and most of us don't get immunized against the flu, why bother?

Most people actually at risk for a bad case of the flu get a flu shot.

 

[martybegan]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

 

[Mac1958]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

 

[martybegan]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

 

[theHawk]

Luke Letlow, 41 year old GOP congressman-elect from Louisiana has just died of COVID

Funny how it's never a "story" when a democrat gets Covid!

Around 3 out of every 4 covid deaths were to people who wore the mask.

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

The masks offer zero protection and cannot filter the virus.

 

[Mac1958]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

Aww, look at you. Of course it's "not good enough". You're a Trumpster. You'll only believe what Trump and his crew tell you.

This is why I put so little effort into communicating with you people. You're fascinating as hell to observe, but worthless in conversation.

 

[martybegan]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

Aww, look at you. Of course it's "not good enough". You're a Trumpster. You'll only believe what Trump and his crew tell you.

This is why I put so little effort into communicating with you people. You're fascinating as hell to observe, but worthless in conversation.

No, I am an American Citizen demanding to know the basis for these restrictions.

I have a Masters Degree in Chemical Engineering, and I probably know more about statistics and risk analysis that most of the "experts" harping all this bullshit.

Again, what the **** is the scientific basis for closing Bars and such at 10:00 PM? What is the scientific basis for number limits on churches but occupancy limits on other similar gatherings?

 

[Mac1958]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

Aww, look at you. Of course it's "not good enough". You're a Trumpster. You'll only believe what Trump and his crew tell you.

This is why I put so little effort into communicating with you people. You're fascinating as hell to observe, but worthless in conversation.

No, I am an American Citizen demanding to know the basis for these restrictions.

I have a Masters Degree in Chemical Engineering, and I probably know more about statistics and risk analysis that most of the "experts" harping all this bullshit.

Again, what the **** is the scientific basis for closing Bars and such at 10:00 PM? What is the scientific basis for number limits on churches but occupancy limits on other similar gatherings?

I've already told you this. I don't know the specific science. When we are not expert in something, we have to decide whom to trust. You have chosen to trust Trump and his crew. Not much I can do about that, outside of hoping folks like you don't infect and kill too many more people while whining about your "freedom".

I would ask why this needs to be so complicated for you to understand, but I already know the answer to that.

I hope you'll be done soon. This is tedious.

 

[martybegan]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

Aww, look at you. Of course it's "not good enough". You're a Trumpster. You'll only believe what Trump and his crew tell you.

This is why I put so little effort into communicating with you people. You're fascinating as hell to observe, but worthless in conversation.

No, I am an American Citizen demanding to know the basis for these restrictions.

I have a Masters Degree in Chemical Engineering, and I probably know more about statistics and risk analysis that most of the "experts" harping all this bullshit.

Again, what the **** is the scientific basis for closing Bars and such at 10:00 PM? What is the scientific basis for number limits on churches but occupancy limits on other similar gatherings?

I've already told you this. I don't know the specific science. When we are not expert in something, we have to decide whom to trust. You have chosen to trust Trump and his crew. Not much I can do about that, outside of hoping folks like you don't infect and kill too many more people while whining about your "freedom".

I would ask why this needs to be so complicated for you to understand, but I already know the answer to that.

I hope you'll be done soon. This is tedious.

Why can't someone tell us the reasoning behind it? Why do you not care? I know why. The only reason you don't care is you probably still get a paycheck during all this, like I did. So it's someone else's problem and they should just listen to government **** them in the ass like good little comrades.

Why trust them when they refuse to explain their reasoning behind it?

Jesus, what a ******* lemming you are.

Baaaaaaa

 

[Aletheia4u]

will the Dems pick up the seat?

too soon!

Louisiana Congressman-elect Luke Letlow dead from COVID-19

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Luke Letlow, Louisiana's incoming Republican member of the U.S. House, died Tuesday night from complications related to COVID-19 only days before he would have been sworn into office.

apnews.com

He didn't died from COVID. COVID was just inside of him when he was murdered.
Believe me that these people knows how to make a person that was murdered looks as if they've died of natural causes.
There is going to be many more COVID/heart attack deaths in the future. They've probably gave Pres. Trump a dose but his body probably clotted up the dose before it can spread throughout his body. He probably has a lump somewhere in his body.


LSU Health Shreveport Chancellor G.E. Ghali said Letlow died from a heart attack following a procedure related to the infection.

Republican Louisiana Congressman-elect Luke Letlow dies from COVID-19

Luke Letlow, 41, Lousiana's incoming Republican incoming member of the U.S. House died from a heart attack following a procedure related to COVID-19 on Tuesday night.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Mac1958]

How many times do people need to be told, masks offer important, but limited only protection from airborne viruses. The purpose of a mask is mostly to prevent an infected person from spreading viruses to others around them.

Among the countless fallacies that have been inserted into the minds of Trumpsters is the notion that, if science is not perfect, it is worthless.

They're trained on binary thought processes. If masks are not 100% effective, they are absolutely worthless and an assault on our "freedoms".

It's madness. I just hope it fades with time.

Please explain the science of a bar being OK to go into at 9:00 PM, but not OK at 10:00 PM.

Please explain the science of say a restaurant or store being allowed 25% occupancy but a Church being limited to 10 or 25 people only, regardless of occupancy.

There is no science to either. They are reactions to the science that Trumpsters don't like.

Dodge. Again, what is the scientific basis of the two policies in question?

I'll try to keep this simple.

Unlike health scientists (such as our younger daughter), most Americans are not experts in the science of this. So, we decide to follow recommendations by health scientists whose words they trust. As compared to trusting Trump and his obedient Trumpsters, whom we don't trust in the least, because of their arrogant ignorance.

That's your answer. If you don't like it, too bad.

Sorry, not good enough. We have been given no reasoning behind these restrictions, and all of them have come from local level politicians, not "health scientists"

What the hell is a health scientist anyway? What degree are we talking here?

If you are going to ruin a person's livelihood you should be able to tell them why, not just "shut up and listen you dumb ******* rube"

Your arrogance is ******* sad, you bougie prick.

Aww, look at you. Of course it's "not good enough". You're a Trumpster. You'll only believe what Trump and his crew tell you.

This is why I put so little effort into communicating with you people. You're fascinating as hell to observe, but worthless in conversation.

No, I am an American Citizen demanding to know the basis for these restrictions.

I have a Masters Degree in Chemical Engineering, and I probably know more about statistics and risk analysis that most of the "experts" harping all this bullshit.

Again, what the **** is the scientific basis for closing Bars and such at 10:00 PM? What is the scientific basis for number limits on churches but occupancy limits on other similar gatherings?

I've already told you this. I don't know the specific science. When we are not expert in something, we have to decide whom to trust. You have chosen to trust Trump and his crew. Not much I can do about that, outside of hoping folks like you don't infect and kill too many more people while whining about your "freedom".

I would ask why this needs to be so complicated for you to understand, but I already know the answer to that.

I hope you'll be done soon. This is tedious.

Why can't someone tell us the reasoning behind it? Why do you not care? I know why. The only reason you don't care is you probably still get a paycheck during all this, like I did. So it's someone else's problem and they should just listen to government **** them in the ass like good little comrades.

Why trust them when they refuse to explain their reasoning behind it?

Jesus, what a ******* lemming you are.

Baaaaaaa

Okay cool!