Lou Dobbs might shake up the faithful for all of two minutes. If nothing else, Dobbs is angry for the wrong reason:
VIDEO ā¼
Dobbs: Judge Gorsuch should withdraw his name
Dobbsā thoughts were right on the money when he nailed the legal profession. He was wrong about honor. Aside from Hollywood movies and TV shows, since when have lawyers been seen as honorable by anybody except lawyers? Preventing another lawyer from being confirmed is rather ridiculous when you look at all of the used condoms sitting on federal benches from top to bottom. Dobbs himself pointed out the number of Democrats legislating from the bench āā a whopping 70 percent.
The fact is that Gorsuch is not that important, nor is the High Courtās sacred balance. The record shows that liberalismās ideology marched ahead since the FDR years regardless of which political party decided cases. Finding enough āhonorableā lawyers to stop Socialismās march is an impossible dream. Where in hell can you find 7 percent let alone 70 percent?
As for Gorsuch:
In Search Of A Constitutional Definition For Islam
Finally, all lawyers work for the government because all lawyers do their work for the courts even if they never see the inside of a courtroom.
Lawyers double-dip by complicating the law in order to generate income for their profession. Cynics claim that lawyers built the public feed tub to sate themselves. Others claim that lawyering is the oldest profession and that is why they are so adept at acquiring a nationās wealth. Lawyers have definitely been feeding at the public trough longer than any other profession.
p.s. An old chestnut says prostitution is the oldest profession. If that is true then lawyering has to be the first profession to live off the earnings of hustling girls. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find lawyers paid to defend working girls who put their heels behind their ears for a few colored pebbles.
https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.0lTkZdCUkaCsN3_DvWh2xQEYEs&pid=Api&w=168&h=181
āI believe Gorsuch if he has any honor should withdraw his name.ā
VIDEO ā¼
Dobbs: Judge Gorsuch should withdraw his name
Dobbsā thoughts were right on the money when he nailed the legal profession. He was wrong about honor. Aside from Hollywood movies and TV shows, since when have lawyers been seen as honorable by anybody except lawyers? Preventing another lawyer from being confirmed is rather ridiculous when you look at all of the used condoms sitting on federal benches from top to bottom. Dobbs himself pointed out the number of Democrats legislating from the bench āā a whopping 70 percent.
The fact is that Gorsuch is not that important, nor is the High Courtās sacred balance. The record shows that liberalismās ideology marched ahead since the FDR years regardless of which political party decided cases. Finding enough āhonorableā lawyers to stop Socialismās march is an impossible dream. Where in hell can you find 7 percent let alone 70 percent?
As for Gorsuch:
I do not want to put a damper on the dreams and aspirations conservatives are placing in Neil Gorsuch, but I am reminded of the euphoria Chief Justice John Roberts spread like butter on a hot bagel. Roberts turned out badly. He, and he alone, could have stopped the ACA. Instead, Roberts tortured the Constitution into a tax for socialized medicine. And let us not forget Earl Warren, William Brennan, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter, conservatives all. My point. The Supreme Court is a crap shoot at best.
I freely admit that Gorsuch sounds good:
I freely admit that Gorsuch sounds good:
so what is to fear from Neil Gorsuch? Answer: He is just another lawyer, and a Harvard lawyer on top of it.
In Search Of A Constitutional Definition For Islam
Finally, all lawyers work for the government because all lawyers do their work for the courts even if they never see the inside of a courtroom.
Lawyers double-dip by complicating the law in order to generate income for their profession. Cynics claim that lawyers built the public feed tub to sate themselves. Others claim that lawyering is the oldest profession and that is why they are so adept at acquiring a nationās wealth. Lawyers have definitely been feeding at the public trough longer than any other profession.
p.s. An old chestnut says prostitution is the oldest profession. If that is true then lawyering has to be the first profession to live off the earnings of hustling girls. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find lawyers paid to defend working girls who put their heels behind their ears for a few colored pebbles.
