LOL! Usually-Chesty Chuck Schumer whimpers during press conference about Biden Pardon

[Dante]

312>226
Na, na, na, na, na, na

Really? Very pedestrian

Obama 2012: 332>206

Obama 2008 365>173

Clinton 1992 370>78

Clinton 1996 379>159

 

[Dante]

No no, the dainty. I am reading the law and trying hard to explain it to you in a way that even a dipshit such as you might be able to grasp.

The fact that you can’t or won’t is entirely on you.

Now, read my prior post and try to grasp the most highlighted portions of what I quoted.

quote out of a full context all you want

people know

people know when you lie through omission

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This is hilarious.. Boisterous Schumer reduced to cowering like a parrot.

View attachment 1050054

REPORTER #1: “Do you agree with some of your Democrat colleagues that President Biden pardoning Hunter Biden was wrong, unwise, and put personal interest ahead of unity?”

SCHUMER: “I got nothin’ for you on that.”

REPORTER #2: “Can I follow up on that? Are you concerned about the lack of transparency, the lack of honesty, around Biden’s decision to pardon his son?”

SCHUMER: “As I’ve said, I got nothin’ for you on that.”

REPORTER #2: “Can I follow up on that, too?”

SCHUMER: “Nope.”

REPORTER #3: “Are you concerned that pardoning anyone on the way out of office, family members, sets a poor precedent?”

SCHUMER: “Thank you. I’ve got nothing for you on that.”

REPORTER #4: “But the question is: You’ve talked about the January 6 pardons; this is a playbook for incoming President Trump, isn’t this a problem? Did he not establish a bad precedent for pardons?”

SCHUMER: “I’ve got nothin’ for you on that. Any other subjects?”

What happened Chuck? I thought lying and corruption were a problem?

What a cowardly British cigarette

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Really? Very pedestrian

Obama 2012: 332>206

Obama 2008 365>173

Clinton 1992 370>78

Clinton 1996 379>159

Biden lost every single swing state. What the hell are you talking about? Your post actually makes Trump’s win that much more impressive. Would you like me to explain why? You’re stupid so you may need my help. Lmk

 

[Modern Messiah]

Really? Very pedestrian

Obama 2012: 332>206

Obama 2008 365>173

Clinton 1992 370>78

Clinton 1996 379>159

You triggered?
Yep. You triggered.
312>226
Get some help with your TDS.
Please!
You are shallow, and pedantic.

 

[BackAgain]

quote out of a full context all you want

people know

people know when you lie through omission

No. Idiots like you can’t grasp what you read and ignore the facets of any law with which you happen to disagree.

Look. It’s clear that you lie. You can’t even admit that I properly used the law (which YOU pointed to) to demonstrate that I am correct and that you remain stubbornly and stupidly wrong.

We all see that you lack the ability to validly defend your position.

Nevertheless, where a defendant cannot appeal the jury verdict until the court enters the “judgment of conviction,” then obviously the defendant is not yet convicted until the sentence and entry of judgment.

 

[Dante]

Biden lost every single swing state. What the hell are you talking about? Your post actually makes Trump’s win that much more impressive. Would you like me to explain why? You’re stupid so you may need my help. Lmk

Column by Paul Kane
November 9, 2024 at 2:43 p.m. EST

In his valedictory speech, President-elect Donald Trump rattled off what he claimed were supposed victories in Senate races that propelled Republicans to the majority in the chamber.

“Montana, Nevada, Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin,” Trump said early Wednesday, before boasting how “we’ll be keeping control of the House.”

Eventually, Republicans lost the Senate races in Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin. And in the House, Democrats still have a narrow chance to claim the majority — and, at minimum, they staved off the deep losses that usually come alongside losing the presidency.

Despite so far appearing to secure the popular-vote victory — likely for only the second time for a Republican candidate in the past nine presidential elections — Trump’s coattails did their jobs unevenly.

True, he ran so far ahead of Vice President Kamala Harris in Montana and Ohio, by about 12 and 20 percentage points, respectively, that he pulled along two novice candidates, though only with single-digit victories.

In the five states that were both presidential and Senate battlegrounds, Trump won all five. Yet Senate Republicans lost four and are projected to win Pennsylvania by such a narrow margin that Democrats haven’t yet conceded.

In 2016 and 2020, only Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a centrist with a decades-long brand, won a Senate race in a state where the opposing party’s candidate won the presidential ballot.

And in the House, Democrats could at least yield a net gain of a couple of seats. That would leave the GOP with the smallest majority in almost 110 years, even smaller than its current majority, which has proved very difficult for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to govern.

Normally, the party suffering a multimillion-ballot loss in the popular presidential vote would suffer in lower-profile downballot races, but enough voters in critical battlegrounds split their tickets to avoid a full Democratic wipeout.

 

[Dante]

You triggered?
Yep. You triggered.
312>226
Get some help with your TDS.
Please!
You are shallow, and pedantic.

not a huge win -- by the numbers

popular vote ???

in the shithole meaning he has no mandate and people still dislike his fat sorry old arse

 

[Dante]

No. Idiots like you can’t grasp what you read and ignore the facets of any law with which you happen to disagree.

Look. It’s clear that you lie. You can’t even admit that I properly used the law (which YOU pointed to) to demonstrate that I am correct and that you remain stubbornly and stupidly wrong.

We all see that you lack the ability to validly defend your position.

Nevertheless, where a defendant cannot appeal the jury verdict until the court enters the “judgment of conviction,” then obviously the defendant is not yet convicted until the sentence and entry of judgment.

dance dance dance

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced." - NY State

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Biden lost every single swing state. What the hell are you talking about? Your post actually makes Trump’s win that much more impressive. Would you like me to explain why? You’re stupid so you may need my help. Lmk

Procrustes Stretched are you going to address this or run like a coward?

 

[Crepitus]

Thanks for reminding us, of America's Mandela.

Oh holy shit!

Tell me you did not just try to compare dOnald tRump to Nelson Mandela!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Column by Paul Kane
November 9, 2024 at 2:43 p.m. EST

In his valedictory speech, President-elect Donald Trump rattled off what he claimed were supposed victories in Senate races that propelled Republicans to the majority in the chamber.

“Montana, Nevada, Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin,” Trump said early Wednesday, before boasting how “we’ll be keeping control of the House.”

Eventually, Republicans lost the Senate races in Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin. And in the House, Democrats still have a narrow chance to claim the majority — and, at minimum, they staved off the deep losses that usually come alongside losing the presidency.

Despite so far appearing to secure the popular-vote victory — likely for only the second time for a Republican candidate in the past nine presidential elections — Trump’s coattails did their jobs unevenly.

True, he ran so far ahead of Vice President Kamala Harris in Montana and Ohio, by about 12 and 20 percentage points, respectively, that he pulled along two novice candidates, though only with single-digit victories.

In the five states that were both presidential and Senate battlegrounds, Trump won all five. Yet Senate Republicans lost four and are projected to win Pennsylvania by such a narrow margin that Democrats haven’t yet conceded.

In 2016 and 2020, only Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a centrist with a decades-long brand, won a Senate race in a state where the opposing party’s candidate won the presidential ballot.

And in the House, Democrats could at least yield a net gain of a couple of seats. That would leave the GOP with the smallest majority in almost 110 years, even smaller than its current majority, which has proved very difficult for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to govern.

Normally, the party suffering a multimillion-ballot loss in the popular presidential vote would suffer in lower-profile downballot races, but enough voters in critical battlegrounds split their tickets to avoid a full Democratic wipeout.

Don’t dodge. One at a time. Did you see my post about the electoral votes?

 

[Dante]

Don’t dodge. One at a time. Did you see my post about the electoral votes?

No I did not. 8 posts now. What number?

 

[Modern Messiah]

not a huge win -- by the numbers

popular vote ???

in the shithole meaning he has no mandate and people still dislike his fat sorry old arse

What did you like the most about the tater and cackles administration. Out of the 4 year term, what did you like the best? Name something.

 

[Dante]

Biden lost every single swing state. What the hell are you talking about? Your post actually makes Trump’s win that much more impressive. Would you like me to explain why? You’re stupid so you may need my help. Lmk

dumb

 

[Dante]

Procrustes Stretched are you going to address this or run like a coward?

312? LOL Really? Very pedestrian

Obama 2012: 332>206

Obama 2008 365>173

Clinton 1992 370>78

Clinton 1996 379>159

 

[BackAgain]

dance dance dance

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced." - NY State

No. And you should cite your source with a valid link, ya pinhead.

It is incorrect to say that a guilty verdict constitutes a conviction. It does not.

Entry of a judgment is what constitutes a conviction. And only then can a defendant appeal.

Let me confuse the dainty a bit more. I now cite a NY State CIVIL procedure law section. N.Y. Civ. Practice Law & Rules § 5016 – Entry of judgment

And I cite it because, in NY State, the civil practice rules govern criminal procedure, too, except where otherwise provided.

S 450.10 Appeal by defendant to intermediate appellate court;
in what cases authorized as of right.
An appeal to an intermediate appellate court may be taken as of right
by the defendant from the following judgment, sentence and order of a
criminal court:
1. A judgment other than one including a sentence of death, unless
the appeal is based solely upon the ground that a sentence was harsh or
excessive when such sentence was predicated upon entry of a plea of
guilty and the sentence imposed did not exceed that which was agreed to
by the defendant as a condition of the plea and set forth on the record
or filed with the court as required by subdivision five of section
220.50 or subdivision four of section 340.20;
2. A sentence other than one of death, as prescribed in subdivision
one of section 450.30, unless the appeal is based solely upon the ground
that a sentence was harsh or excessive when such sentence was predicated
upon entry of a plea of guilty and the sentence imposed did not exceed
that which was agreed to by the defendant as a condition of the plea and
set forth in the record or filed with the court as required by
subdivision five of section 220.50 or subdivision four of section
340.20;
3. A sentence including an order of criminal forfeiture entered
pursuant to section 460.30 of the penal law with respect to such
forfeiture order.
4. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.40, setting aside a
sentence other than one of death, upon motion of the People.
5. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to subdivision one-a of
section 440.30, for forensic DNA testing of evidence.

Article 450 | NYS CPL | Appeals What Cases Authorized Courts

NY Criminal Procedure Law Appeals In What Cases Authorized and to What Courts Taken Article 450. Appeal by people from trial order of dismissal | NY Laws

ypdcrime.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No I did not. 8 posts now. What number?

71

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

dumb

So you need me to explain it? Because your post makes this election that much more impressive for Trump

 

[Dante]

No. And you should cite your source with a valid link, ya pinhead.

It is incorrect to say that a guilty verdict constitutes a conviction. It does not.

Entry of a judgment is what constitutes a conviction. And only then can a defendant appeal.

Let me confuse the dainty a bit more. I now cite a NY State CIVIL procedure law section. N.Y. Civ. Practice Law & Rules § 5016 – Entry of judgment

And I cite it because, in NY State, the civil practice rules govern criminal procedure, too, except where otherwise provided.

Article 450 | NYS CPL | Appeals What Cases Authorized Courts

NY Criminal Procedure Law Appeals In What Cases Authorized and to What Courts Taken Article 450. Appeal by people from trial order of dismissal | NY Laws

ypdcrime.com

Stop playing games -- with yourself.

I've listed the law on this. Now you bring in a formality.

You keep falling back to "Sentence on date of conviction." as if conviction is tied to sentencing. It is not. Conviction comes before sentencing. A sentence can be imposed on the date of a guilty verdict, or at a later date. But a finding of guilty brings with it a conviction. If there is no sentencing - as in a fine and no time in a facility -- ???

You highlighted this part:
(c) Issue an order deferring sentencing in accordance with the
provisions of subdivision three of this section; or..

That refers to:
3. Sentence on date of conviction. The court may sentence the
defendant at the time the conviction is entered if:

But it all ignores the mentions time and time again of a defendant being convicted of a crime at the time of a verdict being entered into the record. A verdict of guilty brings with it a conviction.