LOL! Usually-Chesty Chuck Schumer whimpers during press conference about Biden Pardon

Biden needs to be truly investigated for Burisma, Ukraine, and China. The Biden family basically flew around in Air Force One and shoveled in boat loads of cash from foreign governments. All of them exploding into millionaires

Not shady at all.
~~~~~~
There are severa; issues that still hang over Joey B... Most importantly the issue of Highly Secret SCIF materials purloined while Senator and Joey's actions while Vice President and the 4 intervening years between his Vice presidency and president.
The only manner that he can beat any indictments for those criminal traitorous acts is to pardon himself for the years while a Senator to his exit Jan 21, 2025.
The fact that the DoJ refused to indict Joey in Feb 2024 does not preclude future indictments for Joey's indiscretion and criminal acts regarding the purloined document marked as secret.

**********​
**********​
 
Wrong. Repeating your error doesn’t support you claim, the dainty.

A guilty verdict results (most often, but not always) in a sentence. The combo of the verdict of guilt and the sentence then get entered as a “conviction.”

Fun fact: in NY State, a defendant found guilty at trial by a unanimous jury cannot appeal until there is an entry of the judgment. Why? Because, until that point, there is no conviction to appeal.
You're arguing bs. We all know you are challenged.

try this: (a quick easy link)

"If the jury unanimously finds the defendant "not guilty" on all California criminal charges, the case is dismissed. If the jury unanimously finds defendant guilty, then the defendant will proceed to a sentencing hearing. California criminal procedure has a mechanism for defendants to set aside their convictions and obtain a new trial even after a jury has found them guilty of a criminal offense following a jury trial. This is known as a motion for new trial and described under California Penal Code 1181."

 
~~~~~~
There are severa; issues that still hang over Joey B... Most importantly the issue of Highly Secret SCIF materials purloined while Senator and Joey's actions while Vice President and the 4 intervening years between his Vice presidency and president.
The only manner that he can beat any indictments for those criminal traitorous acts is to pardon himself for the years while a Senator to his exit Jan 21, 2025.
The fact that the DoJ refused to indict Joey in Feb 2024 does not preclude future indictments for Joey's indiscretion and criminal acts regarding the purloined document marked as secret.

**********​
**********​
Hunter Pardoned & Trump is still a Convicted Felon and a Proven Sexual Predator

Na, na, na, na, na, na...
 
You're arguing bs. We all know you are challenged.

try this: (a quick easy link)

"If the jury unanimously finds the defendant "not guilty" on all California criminal charges, the case is dismissed. If the jury unanimously finds defendant guilty, then the defendant will proceed to a sentencing hearing. California criminal procedure has a mechanism for defendants to set aside their convictions and obtain a new trial even after a jury has found them guilty of a criminal offense following a jury trial. This is known as a motion for new trial and described under California Penal Code 1181."

This was a NY case, you asshole.

And you can’t appeal a conviction until there is one in NY.

Somehow I knew that would fly over your pinhead, the dainty.
 
Last edited:
Still wrong. But the dainty doesn’t give a shit about facts or honesty.
Idiot!


"If you are in jail and are acquitted of all the charges, you will be immediately released from jail. If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced."

One follows the other.

D'Oh!

 
Idiot!


"If you are in jail and are acquitted of all the charges, you will be immediately released from jail. If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced."

One follows the other.

D'Oh!

Then surely before the entry of judgment a person can appeal?

Your endless ignorance is tragic.
 
Appeal, yes. Appeal their conviction, which you claim is not a reality. One is an appealing a conviction. Get it -- conviction.
You don’t get it. Until the entry of judgment of the conviction, there is no conviction.

The defendant then gets his right (for the very first time) to file an appeal. Before that, he can’t appeal.

✈️ ✈️ 🛩️ 🛩️

Jets still zooming far over your head.
 
"To obtain a conviction, the second step of the process (sentencing) has to happen first."

You are just wrong.

MSN
who do you imagine you are replying to and what is it you are trying to say?
 
You don’t get it. Until the entry of judgment of the conviction, there is no conviction.

The defendant then gets his right (for the very first time) to file an appeal. Before that, he can’t appeal.

✈️ ✈️ 🛩️ 🛩️

Jets still zooming far over your head.
What is the defendant appealing? The guilty verdict.

conviction: A finding of guilt of an offense, following either a guilty plea or a trial verdict. Court of Appeals: The highest court in New York State, located in Albany, New York.


"The decision of the jury is called a verdict."

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced. Your case will then be adjourned for sentencing."

Concerned American Liability

The quotes are straight out of the NYC Bar handbook :auiqs.jpg:
 
What is the defendant appealing? The guilty verdict.

conviction: A finding of guilt of an offense, following either a guilty plea or a trial verdict. Court of Appeals: The highest court in New York State, located in Albany, New York.


"The decision of the jury is called a verdict."

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced. Your case will then be adjourned for sentencing."
A defendant doesn’t simply appeal the guilty verdict or even the conviction. Defendants usually appeal both the conviction (once it has been entered, of course) AND the sentence which must precede the entry of judgment.

No matter how convoluted your posts may be, the dainty, nothing you write changes that. You know why? Because it’s a fact.

And you’re ignorant. Once again, you just simply don’t know what you’re talking bout.
 
A defendant doesn’t simply appeal the guilty verdict or even the conviction. Defendants usually appeal both the conviction (once it has been entered, of course) AND the sentence which must precede the entry of judgment.

No matter how convoluted your posts may be, the dainty, nothing you write changes that. You know why? Because it’s a fact.

And you’re ignorant. Once again, you just simply don’t know what you’re talking bout.
again:


conviction: A finding of guilt of an offense, following either a guilty plea or a trial verdict. Court of Appeals: The highest court in New York State, located in Albany, New York.

"The decision of the jury is called a verdict."

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced. Your case will then be adjourned for sentencing."
 
You don’t get it. Until the entry of judgment of the conviction, there is no conviction.

The defendant then gets his right (for the very first time) to file an appeal. Before that, he can’t appeal.

✈️ ✈️ 🛩️ 🛩️

Jets still zooming far over your head.
I wish you could go on CNN, MSNBC, The View, Jimmy Kimmel, etc and explain this to all the uninformed emotional ivory-tower elitists having their meltdowns
 
again:


conviction: A finding of guilt of an offense, following either a guilty plea or a trial verdict. Court of Appeals: The highest court in New York State, located in Albany, New York.

"The decision of the jury is called a verdict."

"If you are found guilty, you have been convicted and must be sentenced. Your case will then be adjourned for sentencing."
The publication by the bar is not the same as the law written by the legislature, signed by the governor and used by the prosecutors, the judges and the defendants.

Your ongoing ignorance is actually highlighted by your use of third hand sources.
 
I wish you could go on CNN, MSNBC, The View, Jimmy Kimmel, etc and explain this to all the uninformed emotional ivory-tower elitists having their meltdowns
Honestly, i am a bit surprised that those who do go on those shows never seem to make the point.

There is a guilty verdict which is not yet a conviction until the court passes sentence and enters judgment of conviction and sentence.

And until that entry of judgment, there is no conviction to appeal.
 
Honestly, i am a bit surprised that those who do go on those shows never seem to make the point.

There is a guilty verdict which is not yet a conviction until the court passes sentence and enters judgment of conviction and sentence.

And until that entry of judgment, there is no conviction to appeal.
Sunny Hosten was supposedly a prosecutor, so she’s knowingly lying all the time.. but we all knew that
 
I wish you could go on CNN, MSNBC, The View, Jimmy Kimmel, etc and explain this to all the uninformed emotional ivory-tower elitists having their meltdowns
He will -- after he Changes his name to DrinkingAgain
 
Sunny Hosten was supposedly a prosecutor, so she’s knowingly lying all the time.. but we all knew that
technically: Sentencing is "the court proceeding where the judge determines the appropriate punishment for the defendant based on the guilty verdict."

But we all know Trump is a convicted felon awaiting sentencing.

"A guilty finding, in criminal law, means that a court or jury has found evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the crime they are charged with. It can also refer to the plea a defendant makes if they wish to admit to committing the crime they are charged with."

We all know Trump is proven to be a sexual predator and is a convicted felon.
 
Back
Top Bottom