The entire "military grade" vs. "civilian" model is an absurd discussion anyway. The founders full intended us to have nothing but "military grade" weapons. They wrote over and over and over that the 2nd Amendment was explicitly to protect the people from the government. That the people should easily be able to over throw their own government if necessary.
So it's a dumb argument. The American people have the Constitutional right to any military weapon in the world. And yes...that means up to and including nuclear weapons. But that won't be an issue for you ignorant dumbocrats as there are no American companies that sell nuclear weapons. That means getting one off the black market (tens of millions of dollars incidentally - meaning only the ultra wealthy elite can afford it and I suspect Bill Gates and Warren Buffet aren't in the market for a nuclear bomb) from another nation. In addition - nuclear bombs require multiple codes to launch (it is a basic safety measure - even the president of the United States cannot launch a nuclear weapon by himself). So this is yet another nonsensical, immature position by desperate liberals attempting to justify their anti-constitutional, anti-American position.
Bottom line - we have a right to any "military-grade" weapon.
So go get yourself a couple of F15s and a hand full armed drones.
I can't afford the F-15's and wouldn't know how to fly them. The reaper drones armed with hellfire missiles certainly pique my interest, but again, when I weigh cost and practically it's not something I would do. For now, I'm focused on the
Dillon M134 "mini" gun (nothing mini about that bad ass):
The
Barrett M468:
And the
LWRC PSD:
Sadly...all of them were unconstitutionally made illegal by liberals at the moment. But I'm hoping to see that overturned soon.