You already posted up the connections with links on the forum last week when we started discussing how this movement wasn't spontanious nor grassroots but pre-planned and supported by rich liberal interest groups.
And they were evidence of nothing except that rich liberal groups have wanted something like this to happen for years, and now that it is are trying to co-opt it (or, to be charitable, showing it support).
The only thing that would support CG's claims is evidence that most of the participants in OWS recognize the leadership of these liberal groups, and are there because they were called to be there. Show that, and you have something. Fail to do so, and you have nothing.
In fact, I see criticism of the movement from the right taking two inherently contradictory forms. On the one hand, there is the mischaracterization of it as all top-down, pre-planned, and controlled by a conspiracy. On the other, there is the accusation (with a bit more evidence behind it) that it is incoherent, disorganized, messy, and chaotic. It really can't be both of those.
The reality is that this is a grass-roots movement, or, as I described it in an article here, a mushroom:
Occupy Wall Street is a Mushroom | Socyberty
