Lloyd Hart, master occupier talks about Occupy movement's demands on radio

[California Girl]

Like Lloyd, I am an individual. I have no 'you people'.

Obviously, then, the question was not addressed to you. In fact, by pointing out those relevant details concerning Mr. Hart, you have helped to expose the lie.

You responded to me. How was the question not addressed to me? Are you stupid?

I have 'exposed' nothing. I merely asked a question. Is it the same Lloyd Hart? How the **** is that 'exposing' anyone? Again, are you stupid?

 

[Dragon]

You responded to me. How was the question not addressed to me?

The question was not addressed to you. It was addressed to others on this public board who might read it, and who have posted on this thread as if they believe that Lloyd Hart is an authority for the occupy movement. You have not expressed that opinion. If you thought the question addressed to you, I apologize for the confusion.

I have 'exposed' nothing. I merely asked a question. Is it the same Lloyd Hart?

Let's put it this way. If it is the same Lloyd Hart, that blows any contention that he is any kind of authority over the occupy movement clean out of the water (not that such a claim had any sense behind it to begin with). So even if there is doubt about who he is, you have, as I said, helped to expose the lie. For which you have my thanks.

By the way, since we got onto a rules discussion earlier, this passage might be of interest to you:

"Derogatory statements directed at other members as well as direct or indirect personal attacks are permitted with the stipulation that you generally look like a fool when resorting to these tactics within a serious conversation on real issues. If you're comfortable playing the fool, feel free to do so."

You might want to bear that in mind in the future.

 

[Si modo]

You responded to me. How was the question not addressed to me?

The question was not addressed to you. It was addressed to others on this public board who might read it, and who have posted on this thread as if they believe that Lloyd Hart is an authority for the occupy movement. You have not expressed that opinion. If you thought the question addressed to you, I apologize for the confusion.

I have 'exposed' nothing. I merely asked a question. Is it the same Lloyd Hart?

Let's put it this way. If it is the same Lloyd Hart, that blows any contention that he is any kind of authority over the occupy movement clean out of the water (not that such a claim had any sense behind it to begin with). So even if there is doubt about who he is, you have, as I said, helped to expose the lie. For which you have my thanks.

By the way, since we got onto a rules discussion earlier, this passage might be of interest to you:

"Derogatory statements directed at other members as well as direct or indirect personal attacks are permitted with the stipulation that you generally look like a fool when resorting to these tactics within a serious conversation on real issues. If you're comfortable playing the fool, feel free to do so."

You might want to bear that in mind in the future.

Meh, here that doesn't mean much at all. In fact, flaming - well, clever flaming - is an art form for some.

It's the Wild West and only the strong survive.

 

[Avorysuds]

The hoast was a tool, full of shit and lied and so was the caller, Lloyd.

 

[California Girl]

You responded to me. How was the question not addressed to me?

The question was not addressed to you. It was addressed to others on this public board who might read it, and who have posted on this thread as if they believe that Lloyd Hart is an authority for the occupy movement. You have not expressed that opinion. If you thought the question addressed to you, I apologize for the confusion.

I have 'exposed' nothing. I merely asked a question. Is it the same Lloyd Hart?

Let's put it this way. If it is the same Lloyd Hart, that blows any contention that he is any kind of authority over the occupy movement clean out of the water (not that such a claim had any sense behind it to begin with). So even if there is doubt about who he is, you have, as I said, helped to expose the lie. For which you have my thanks.

By the way, since we got onto a rules discussion earlier, this passage might be of interest to you:

"Derogatory statements directed at other members as well as direct or indirect personal attacks are permitted with the stipulation that you generally look like a fool when resorting to these tactics within a serious conversation on real issues. If you're comfortable playing the fool, feel free to do so."

You might want to bear that in mind in the future.

When one quotes another poster, one generally acknowledges that the comments are addressed to them. If your question was not addressed to me, then why quote my post? Doesn't make a lot of sense, to a rational person.

No, that comment is of no interest to me. I call it as I see it. ******* moron... but then, communists usually are.

 

[Si modo]

It was ... ummmmmm.

Honestly? I wanted to say funny, but the more I think about it, it makes me sad.

The socialists in our great nation have done so much damage to our education system that THIS is what is common - the Lloyd Harts.

My Gawd - the Useful Idiots are now the norm. They are ripe for the picking by the ever-so patient totalitarian oppressors.

 

[California Girl]

It was ... ummmmmm.

Honestly? I wanted to say funny, but the more I think about it, it makes me sad.

The socialists in our great nation have done so much damage to our education system that THIS is what is common - the Lloyd Harts.

My Gawd - the Useful Idiots are now the norm. They are ripe for the picking by the ever-so patient totalitarian oppressors.

Hence my question.... is it the same Lloyd Hart? If it is, then that tells me a lot.... Lloyd has connections to Watermelon Man, Van Jones. Coincidence? I think not.

 

[Dragon]

When one quotes another poster, one generally acknowledges that the comments are addressed to them. If your question was not addressed to me, then why quote my post? Doesn't make a lot of sense, to a rational person.

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.

No, that comment is of no interest to me.

[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

 

[Avorysuds]

What Lloyd does not understand is that if you pay people 20$ an hour but because it costs so much to employee people and to get goods from let’s say China, 20$ an hour will be equal to 5$ an hour today very quickly, like months kind of quick. Inflation will go through the roof.

Not to mention he wants a living wage paid to people that don’t work, indefinitely… Using some weird form of the honor system where people work at some point out of boredom.

 

[California Girl]

When one quotes another poster, one generally acknowledges that the comments are addressed to them. If your question was not addressed to me, then why quote my post? Doesn't make a lot of sense, to a rational person.

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.

No, that comment is of no interest to me.

[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

 

[Si modo]

When one quotes another poster, one generally acknowledges that the comments are addressed to them. If your question was not addressed to me, then why quote my post? Doesn't make a lot of sense, to a rational person.

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.

No, that comment is of no interest to me.

[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Green on the outside, pinko on the inside.

 

[California Girl]

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.



[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Green on the outside, pinko on the inside.

The one and only.

There are some interesting articles (proper academic ones) about the damage done to the environmental movements by its hijacking by the left wing to further their political agenda.

 

[The T]

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Green on the outside, pinko on the inside.

The one and only.

There are some interesting articles (proper academic ones) about the damage done to the environmental movements by its hijacking by the left wing to further their political agenda.

As that same left wing will say the right is responsible and *gasp* hates science?

 

[Si modo]

When one quotes another poster, one generally acknowledges that the comments are addressed to them. If your question was not addressed to me, then why quote my post? Doesn't make a lot of sense, to a rational person.

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.

No, that comment is of no interest to me.

[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Ha! It IS the same Lloyd Hart.







No surprise.

 

[Dragon]

It's not a privilege. It's my right

You are of course correct. It is everyone's right on this board to present himself or herself as a crass, poorly-brought-up, rude, obnoxious dunderhead, if for some unfathomable reason that is what he or she wants to do. It is not a privilege, reserved only for a few.

I stand corrected.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Used to be. But the point of course is that neither Hart nor Jones actually is a spokesperson for OWS. As far as I know Jones hasn't claimed to be, but apparently Hart has.

 

[California Girl]

I quoted your post because the information in it was interesting, and because that information informed my question, which was addressed to others. Apparently I didn't make that sufficiently clear, and again, I apologize for the confusion.



[Shrug.] If you are all right with playing the fool, that is of course your privilege.

It's not a privilege, commie. It's my right... on this board. It's a free speach place. I know you will struggle with that concept but that's the way it is.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Ha! It IS the same Lloyd Hart.







No surprise.

Now that is interesting. This makes it very difficult for the left to pretend it is 'grassroots'.... given his connections to a host of left wing causes... most recently, Van Jones and Tides.

Fascinating shit.

 

[California Girl]

It's not a privilege. It's my right

You are of course correct. It is everyone's right on this board to present himself or herself as a crass, poorly-brought-up, rude, obnoxious dunderhead, if for some unfathomable reason that is what he or she wants to do. It is not a privilege, reserved only for a few.

I stand corrected.

I too find the fact that Lloyd Hart is fronting for OWS.... mainly because of his connection to Watermelon Man and Tides. Connections. But, you know Watermelon Man, right? He's a commie too!

Used to be. But the point of course is that neither Hart nor Jones actually is a spokesperson for OWS. As far as I know Jones hasn't claimed to be, but apparently Hart has.

Worry about your own reputation, and I'll worry about mine.

Now, that's becoming harder and harder to deny. Do your own research, Dragon. It's not looking good from the 'plausible deniability' front. In the words of the very wise Scooby Doo "R'uh Oh".

 

[Dragon]

Now, that's becoming harder and harder to deny. Do your own research, Dragon. It's not looking good from the 'plausible deniability' front. In the words of the very wise Scooby Doo "R'uh Oh".

What's becoming harder to deny? Nothing, as far as I can see. You have, so far, presented absolutely no evidence that Van Jones has any control or influence over OWS. Not a scrap. Just as a guideline and a suggestion, any such evidence, to be evidence of anything, would have to be found on the OWS end, not the Van Jones end; there is no quote from him or sign of activity by him that you could present that would prove anything about a connection between him and OWS.

As for Hart, the only evidence is that he claims to be some kind of authority, a claim that's not acknowledged by anyone else in the movement except himself, and presents opinions that no one else in the movement shares.

There's no there there.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I was watching a live feed from NYC, I saw/heard everything from bankers to medical marijuana. And some hippie looking guy on the guitar singing (Lyrics went something like whats next? Who cares? Triggerhappiness, trigerhappiness, triggerhappiness triggerhappiness.


Comments being made:
Jews control the globe.

this is no animal farm




Pretty weird, I think the hippies of the 60's were more in unity..................

 

[The T]

I was watching a live feed from NYC, I saw/heard everything from bankers to medical marijuana. And some hippie looking guy on the guitar singing (Lyrics went something like whats next? Who cares? Triggerhappiness, trigerhappiness, triggerhappiness triggerhappiness.


Comments being made:
Jews control the globe.

this is no animal farm




Pretty weird, I think the hippies of the 60's were more in unity..................

..........and held concerts so they could wallow in mud...freely.