Live link to JACK SMITH testifying to Congress about Trump prosecutions (10am Eastern)

[struth]

Moron, you've been here long enough to know very well "what crime"

Here is Trump's indictement, maybe read it THIS TIME.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

The one that was dismissed? and just why did he need to wiretap the Speaker of the House for that failed indictment?

 

[AntonToo]

what do you think it means?

I mean, it literally means physically running off to avoid prosecution...physically leaving the jurisidiction. Do you think you can just make things up now?

Fleeing prosecution means leaving a jurisdiction to avoid facing criminal charges, often by crossing state or national borders, which creates a fugitive from justice status, leading to arrest warrants, extradition requests, and the suspension of statutes of limitations, with federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1073) specifically addressing "Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution" (UFAP). It's a serious offense that can result in harsher penalties, with law enforcement actively pursuing fugitives, sometimes using bounty hunters, and courts treating such actions severely.
Google Search

Yea sure, I'll give 100% of that to you....now read the whole thing minus the objection

"reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution, destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

Is that any less of a reason to not disclose the investigation of records - **** no.

Game over, these nitpicks not serious argument that not disclosing investigative steps was improper.

 

[AntonToo]

The one that was dismissed?

It was dismissed without prejudice by a Trumptard named Cannon on technical grounds that Jack Smith had no right to bring charges, there wasn't ever real refutation of the facts of the case.

Case was then refiled again and there was little reason to think Trump would not get convicted except for him winning the I'm-now-above-the-law card in election.

 

[Failzero]

Bullshit gotcha games.



The nondisclosure order from the court said that there were "reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution, destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

"Was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk?" Gill asked.

"He was not," Smith replied.

"He was not. Then why does your nondisclosure order refer to him as a flight risk?" Gill said.

After some back and forth, Smith answered: "With respect to a nondisclosure order, the risks aren't necessarily associated with the subscriber to the phone. The risks are to the investigation."

Jack Smith defends handling of Trump probes in first public testimony to Congress

Jack Smith, the former special counsel who oversaw two criminal investigations into President Trump during the Biden administration, testified publicly for the first time.

www.cbsnews.com

Flight from prosecution doesn't nescessarily mean physically running off, it means taking steps to obstruct investigators.

Like using the Autopen ?

 

[toobfreak]

Please post any highlights only.

When it comes to Jack Smith, there are only low-lights.

 

[struth]

Yea sure, I'll give 100% of that to you....now read the whole thing minus the objection

"reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution, destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

Is that any less of a reason to not disclose the investigation of records - **** no.

Game over, these nitpicks not serious argument that not disclosing investigative steps was improper.

Gotcha so the speaker is going to intimidate witnesses now! Hahaha sure

 

[struth]

It was dismissed without prejudice by a Trumptard named Cannon on technical grounds that Jack Smith had no right to bring charges, there wasn't ever real refutation of the facts of the case.

Case was then refiled again and there was little reason to think Trump would not get convicted except for him winning the I'm-now-above-the-law card in election.

Th constitution is technical grounds now hahah

You demafacist wonder why we call you fascist

 

[AntonToo]

Th constitution is technical grounds now hahah

Moron, the point is that Cannon, after lenghly convulsions, could not dismiss the criminal case against Trump on the facts.

Her opinion condicted hundreds of years of history and even Supreme Court rulings. It would be (AGAIN!) thrown out if the whole thing wasn't rendered moot by Trump winning the election.

 

[struth]

Moron, the point is that Cannon, after lenghly convulsions, could not dismiss the criminal case against Trump on the facts.

Her opinion condicted hundreds of years of history and even Supreme Court rulings. It would be (AGAIN!) thrown out if the whole thing wasn't rendered moot by Trump winning the election.

Of course she did. The fact was that the prosecution violated the US constitution

 

[toobfreak]

Her opinion condicted hundreds of years of history

'Condicted'? Rule #1: People who cannot even spell or make up words probably don't know WTF they are even talking about...

 

[ColonelAngus]

******* OWNED by a hottie!

 

[IM2]

Smith is being raked over the coals.

And like I said....

 

[IM2]

'Condicted'? Rule #1: People who cannot even spell or make up words probably don't know WTF they are even talking about...

People who make big eal out of a typo shoud not be taken seriously.

 

[AntonToo]

'Condicted'? Rule #1: People who cannot even spell or make up words probably don't know WTF they are even talking about...

Yep, reduced to posting about a mistyped word.

 

[Nostra]

Making stuff up again I see

Can you list ANY lie told by Jack Smith?

Easy.

 

[Nostra]

Making stuff up again I see

Can you list ANY lie told by Jack Smith?

Get educated for once in your pathetic life, loser.

Jack Smith's Deposition of Misrepresentations & Lies

On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee released the 255-page transcript and video of the deposition of former special counsel Jack Smith before the committee earlier this month. Smith’s Non-Existent Powerful Evidence During his opening statements, Smith said he and his team “developed...

www.independentsentinel.com

 

[Winco]

Easy.

Julie Kelly.
Get some REAL facts.
She is a certified Idiot, and so are her followers.
JFC, take off the blinders, SIMP.

 

[Nostra]

Julie Kelly.
Get some REAL facts.
She is a certified Idiot, and so are her followers.
JFC, take off the blinders, SIMP.

Feel free to debunk the transcript posted, Dumbass.

All you have is "NUH-UH".

What a pathetic loser you are.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Feel free to debunk the transcript posted, Dumbass.

All you have is "NUH-UH".

What a pathetic loser you are.

Smith was exposed so badly.

******* WITCH HUNT.

The need to keep the spying secret because THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS A FLIGHT RISK is just beyond.

 

[Nostra]

Feel free to debunk the transcript posted, Dumbass.

All you have is "NUH-UH".

What a pathetic loser you are.

Nothing from Winco

I’m shocked, shocked I tells ya!