List of Statues and Monuments Liberals Want to Destroy

[Bush92]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

 

[Pogo]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

 

[bodecea]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

Every day.....every.day....we get evidence of how clueless trumpanzees are.

 

[depotoo]

3. Mount Rushmore
Vice News’s Wilbert L. Cooper called for Mount Rushmore to be destroyed because the U.S. presidents whose visages are carved into the mountainside are problematic by today’s standards.

 

[Pogo]

3. Mount Rushmore
Vice News’s Wilbert L. Cooper called for Mount Rushmore to be destroyed because the U.S. presidents whose visages are carved into the mountainside are problematic by today’s standards.

Thanks for that. Apparently "Vice News’s Wilbert L. Cooper" is equivalent to "Liberals".
What a guy. He gets around, A LOT.

Guess it's the same kind of math that comes up with "three million illegals" out of nothing.


From the link:

>> Trump and his white supremacist cohorts believe the reverence some Americans have for these statues is simply respect for history, and that tearing them down is tantamount to ripping pages out of a textbook. But monuments built by the state are not history—they manifestations of power. They don't tell you who, what, why, or how something happened. Instead, they just inform you who's in control. This is even true with the Confederate statues, even though the South lost the war.

The reality is that the enshrinement of those generals in statues across the nation mostly did not happen right after the war as a tribute to lost struggle. Instead, they were built in the early 1900s and the 1960s, when it was crucial for those in power to signal that white supremacy would endure in the face of Reconstruction, the Progressive Era, and the civil rights movement. Erecting these statues amounted to power moves by white people who felt threatened. And now that they are being toppled, and neo-Nazis fight against their removal, their true meaning has become clearer than ever. <<​

Well spake. This is what we've been trying to get through to the yahoos ignorant of their own history. Such as this thread where the OP just came from, found his bullshit wasn't selling and started this one to try again expecting different results.

And just for the record, the Vice writer didn't say what the headline claims at all. It lied.

 

[Timmy]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

 

[Polishprince]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

 

[Pogo]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

Nobody brought up "treason", Evelyn Wood.

 

[Timmy]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

And OJ was acquitted of murder .

They let the traitors off the hook so the nation could heal. But face facts . They are the constitutional definition of traitors .

 

[Polishprince]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

Nobody brought up "treason", Evelyn Wood.

I was responding to a reference to "confederate traitors"

 

[Bush92]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

What lost cause. Brothers wiped the blood from their noses and moved on. After Civil War they fought side-by-side in Spanish-American War, WW1, and WW2. Korea, Vietnam. What lost cause? Warriors from military service honor each other.

 

[Polishprince]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

And OJ was acquitted of murder .

They let the traitors off the hook so the nation could heal. But face facts . They are the constitutional definition of traitors .

Do you have a problem with letting the nation heal?

Or do you want to demonize an entire region of the country for all eternity?

 

[Bush92]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

Every day.....every.day....we get evidence of how clueless trumpanzees are.

Hate Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington much prick!

 

[The VOR]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

I see you had to go back 2 and a 1/2 years (8/17/2017) to dig up this bullshit, huh? LOL.

Have somebody change your soiled diaper and put you back to bed, you bitter old dirtbag.

 

[Bush92]

Why don’t we just build monuments to Stalin and Pol Pot? They didn’t kill near as many US troops as the confederate traitors you want to honor .

Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the fact that the Confederates were all EXONERATED of treason. The last rebel to be exonerated (by liberal Jimmy Carter) was President Davis.

And OJ was acquitted of murder .

They let the traitors off the hook so the nation could heal. But face facts . They are the constitutional definition of traitors .

Constitution was still being defined because in 1787 these questions were left unresolved. Therefore the actions of the Southern states were NOT unconstitutional.

 

[Bush92]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

I see you had to go back 2 and a 1/2 years (8/17/2017) to dig up this bullshit, huh? LOL.

Have somebody change your soiled diaper and put you back to bed, you bitter old dirtbag.

Have more gin granny for your drunken dry snatch.

 

[Pogo]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

What lost cause. Brothers wiped the blood from their noses and moved on. After Civil War they fought side-by-side in Spanish-American War, WW1, and WW2. Korea, Vietnam. What lost cause? Warriors from military service honor each other.

Word warriors from schools of revisionist history certainly do apparently.

 

[The VOR]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

I see you had to go back 2 and a 1/2 years (8/17/2017) to dig up this bullshit, huh? LOL.

Have somebody change your soiled diaper and put you back to bed, you bitter old dirtbag.

Have more gin granny for your drunken dry snatch.

You are a freak.

 

[Bush92]

Here's A List Of All The Monuments Liberals Want To Tear Down So Far
Very Orwellian. Very Pol Pot. Very Stalin.

"Big Brother Liberal Democratic Party is watching YOU!"

Your own link is actually titled, "Let's Get Rid of Mount Rushmore".

Then it goes on to the Jefferson Memorial.

What the **** do either one of these have to do with the Cult of the Lost Cause? The only figure in either of those even alive after the Civil war was Teddy Roosevelt, and I'm not aware of his shilling for the Lost Cause's fake history. Whatcha got?

What lost cause. Brothers wiped the blood from their noses and moved on. After Civil War they fought side-by-side in Spanish-American War, WW1, and WW2. Korea, Vietnam. What lost cause? Warriors from military service honor each other.

Word warriors from schools of revisionist history certainly do apparently.

The revisionist history is from the left. Poor Europeans who didn't have an opportunity for shit in the Old World...conquered a New World. Good for them.

 

[Muhammed]

3. Mount Rushmore
Vice News’s Wilbert L. Cooper called for Mount Rushmore to be destroyed because the U.S. presidents whose visages are carved into the mountainside are problematic by today’s standards.

Thanks for that. Apparently "Vice News’s Wilbert L. Cooper" is equivalent to "Liberals".
What a guy. He gets around, A LOT.

Guess it's the same kind of math that comes up with "three million illegals" out of nothing.


From the link:

>> Trump and his white supremacist cohorts believe the reverence some Americans have for these statues is simply respect for history, and that tearing them down is tantamount to ripping pages out of a textbook. But monuments built by the state are not history—they manifestations of power. They don't tell you who, what, why, or how something happened. Instead, they just inform you who's in control. This is even true with the Confederate statues, even though the South lost the war.

The reality is that the enshrinement of those generals in statues across the nation mostly did not happen right after the war as a tribute to lost struggle. Instead, they were built in the early 1900s and the 1960s, when it was crucial for those in power to signal that white supremacy would endure in the face of Reconstruction, the Progressive Era, and the civil rights movement. Erecting these statues amounted to power moves by white people who felt threatened. And now that they are being toppled, and neo-Nazis fight against their removal, their true meaning has become clearer than ever. <<​

Well spake. This is what we've been trying to get through to the yahoos ignorant of their own history. Such as this thread where the OP just came from, found his bullshit wasn't selling and started this one to try again expecting different results.

And just for the record, the Vice writer didn't say what the headline claims at all. It lied.

What Cooper conveniently fails to mention is that those confederate monuments were erected by Democrats to intimidate blacks. Now Democrats want to erase the sordid history of their party by tearing them down.