This thing needs to be examined. Think about it, can we trust the FBI to handle espionage issues if they fall for forged documents concocted by foreign agents to influence a presidential election? You almost gotta laugh that the crazy angry left got away with accusing Trump of "collusion" with foreign agents while they were up to their asses in foreign based propaganda.
The Dossier has all been verified - everything but the pee tape. So everything in your post is a lie.
And we haven't seen the Mueller Report. He filed over 100 charges against 22 individuals and corporation, so your assertions that the Russians didn't hack the DNC server, or coordinate with WikiLeaks to get Trump elected, is completely false. The evidence of that was filed in the indictments.
You almost gotta laugh that the crazy, desperate, Russian-loving Trumpbots are trying to claim that Trump has been exonerated, when we haven't even seen Mueller's report yet.
Dear lady, NOTHING in the fairy tale called the dossier was verified. You need to get better news sources. I am aware that some news sources claimed that parts of the dossier were verified; but they they we.re wrong. You really need to get your news from The Drudge Report.
For your information, Steele himself admitted, under oath, that nothing in the dossier was verified. He further claimed that the documents were never intended to be presented as truthful.
“According to Steele’s courtroom version, the dossier is merely a compilation of bits of “raw intelligence” that were “unverified” and that he passed along because they “warranted further investigation” — i.e., not because he could vouch for their truthfulness. He gave them to American and British government officials, he maintains, only because they raised potential national-security threats, not because they actually established any such threats. That, he now says, was for government investigators to figure out. In sum, Steele’s defamation defense is not that what he wrote was true but that his reports “must be critically viewed in light of the purpose for and circumstances in which the information was collected.” There is laugh-out-loud stuff here: Steele’s declamation of his profound commitment to discretion and secrecy lest his “raw,” “unverified,” and possibly false reports defame anyone. He claimed that he and Fusion GPS had a solemn agreement not to disclose his work . . . except for whenever they decided to disclose his work — including to Fusion’s clients and to major press organs during the stretch run of a contentious presidential election. But not to worry: These discussions were “off the record,” a term Steele claims to have understood to mean “to be used for the purpose of further research but would not be published or attributed.”
Read more at:
Steele Dossier: Obama Officials Politicized Unverified ‘Intelligence’ | National Review
Steele also admitted that most of the dossier was based upon on-line comments on what appeared to be a chat/gossip forum
“Transcripts of the closed door deposition of Christopher Steele, the former British spy, reveals he used online comments from a now-defunct CNN website as his major source to compile his infamous “Trump dossier.”
“According to the transcripts, Steele used a website called CNN iReport to back up his wild anti-Trump theories for his 2009 dossier. He now claims he “wasn’t aware” the information he found on the site was an online community forum, and that poster’s comments had not been “checked for accuracy.”
Christopher Steele ADMITS He Based His Entire Dossier on Unverified ONLINE COMMENTS
CONCLUSION: Nothing in the dossier was verified. Further, Trump has been completely exonerated. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and the Attorney General ruled Trump did not obstruct justice. When an investigation finds no evidence of a crime, that is what normal people call exoneration.