Lindsey Graham On Impeachment

[berg80]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

You mean Clinton did not compromise national security by spooging on that dress?

 

[JoeMoma]

Some people go to prison for less than what Clinton was impeached for.

 

[kyzr]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

Taking advantage of an intern would get ANY manager in the US fired instantly.
IMHO impeaching Clinton was about all of it, doing the intern, and lying about it under oath (perjury).

That said, Clinton's approval rating when he left office is still probably the record. Thanks mostly to Newt, the great economy, and the Budget Surplus.

 

[berg80]

Taking advantage of an intern would get ANY manager in the US fired instantly.

Stealing money from a charitable foundation would land Joe average in jail.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

The only reason Clinton agreed is because he thought he could get away with it. He never figured that a cigar girl would outsmart him. Clinton always made sure his deeds were conducted between him and the woman of choice, and no matter who claims what, there is no proof because there are no witnesses.

 

[pknopp]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

Sexual assault is serious.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

Trump had no reason to testify. Still doesn't.

 

[basquebromance]

Lyin Ted on ABC's This Week Vows Fair Trial in Senate

 

[pknopp]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

Trump had no reason to testify. Still doesn't.

If Trump had been smart and did what he did because the "country " was interested in investigating possible "corruption" he would have been in the clear.

That isn't what he did........because Trump really isn't all that smart.

 

[berg80]

Let's remember that Clinton agreed to testify and it cost him.

Trump refused to testify BECAUSE it would cost him.

Trump is being charged with serious offenses

Clinton was being hounded about a CIVIL case and a BJ

Trump had no reason to testify. Still doesn't.

Trump has refused to testify because he lies......which is perjury, and if he tells the truth he incriminates himself.

 

[hadit]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

Judges hate when you lie in their courts after swearing to tell the truth. Bubba, being a lawyer, knew that.

 

[BWK]

On January 16, 1999, a Southern politician with a mop of faintly graying hair stood on the floor of the United States Senate and made a striking proclamation about what it meant to impeach a president.

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” the politician said. “Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”

That man was South Carolina’s own Lindsey Graham, then a 43-year-old, third-term Republican Congressman. The president in question was Bill Clinton.

What's Lindsey saying now?

He seems to have a different opinion huh...

Graham and his gross hypocrisy have tossed the Constitution straight into the garbage. This is your Republican party now. They actually think, once they acquit Trump, justice will be served. Quite the opposite. The country already knows who is guilty, why, and who was complicit in the crimes. History will send the Republican party the bill. Count on it; Rep. Ihan Omar: Republicans are making mockery of Constitution

 

[BWK]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

Judges hate when you lie in their courts after swearing to tell the truth. Bubba, being a lawyer, knew that.

Except a judge would be lying if he or she ignores the actual evidence exposed by the witnesses. And there are a lot of witnesses, while some need to be heard from and have not. Is the judge going to turn it into a sham to protect a criminal? We will soon see. We are going to see in all its ugliness, the true spirit for treason, when the Republicans flush this investigation down the toilet to protect a criminal. Who, for the second time was trying to cheat the American people out of a free and fair election.

 

[BWK]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

There's a tinge of irony in that Clinton agreed to testify under oath after Starr made it clear Billy would be subpoenaed. It was during that testimony when he lied.

Trump would have told Starr to go **** himself, that neither Starr or Congress were within their rights to investigate him, and he would have tried to block any and all cooperation with Starr..............after assassinating Starr's character.

As for Lindsey, here's what he said................“I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind. I’m not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here.” In another proud moment for the POT Mitch McTreason said he is in bed with the WH lawyers and has no intention of holding an actual trial..............causing James Madison to roll over in his grave.

They don't care for country, Constitution, the rule of law, or their oath. They are openly admitting these things in public.

 

[BWK]

Is Graham a hypocrite? I think we have long known he was.

Senator Robert Byrd said that Clinton's crimes did meet the level of impeachment but that he would not vote to impeach.

The (D)'s are foolish to expect the (R)'s to do what they would not do.

The Dems know fully what and who the Republicans are. They are no longer a mystery. They have exposed themselves as anti-country, and are self serving. "PERIOD"!

 

[BWK]

Bill O'Reilly: The Dems Wish They Had a Way Out of Impeachment

Sorry Bill, but the Dems are doing the right thing.

 

[BWK]

On January 16, 1999, a Southern politician with a mop of faintly graying hair stood on the floor of the United States Senate and made a striking proclamation about what it meant to impeach a president.

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” the politician said. “Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”

That man was South Carolina’s own Lindsey Graham, then a 43-year-old, third-term Republican Congressman. The president in question was Bill Clinton.

What's Lindsey saying now?

He seems to have a different opinion huh...

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

What they said back then had nothing to do bribery of a foreign power. That is treason. Clinton was not involved in bribery of a foreign power. Clinton was involved in the same activity Trump is always involved in. "Grab them by the *****."

 

[hadit]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

Judges hate when you lie in their courts after swearing to tell the truth. Bubba, being a lawyer, knew that.

Except a judge would be lying if he or she ignores the actual evidence exposed by the witnesses. And there are a lot of witnesses, while some need to be heard from and have not. Is the judge going to turn it into a sham to protect a criminal? We will soon see. We are going to see in all its ugliness, the true spirit for treason, when the Republicans flush this investigation down the toilet to protect a criminal. Who, for the second time was trying to cheat the American people out of a free and fair election.

That has nothing to do with Bubba lying under oath, the real reason for his impeachment.

And nice how you're already setting up excuses for when this whole thing goes down in flames and Trump runs the whole campaign season on, "not guilty", or better yet, "aquitted". You're willing to accuse the Republicans of unfairly protecting someone you consider a criminal, but have no problem with the kangaroo court that confirmed your already set opinion that he was guilty.

 

[pknopp]

Is Graham a hypocrite? I think we have long known he was.

Senator Robert Byrd said that Clinton's crimes did meet the level of impeachment but that he would not vote to impeach.

The (D)'s are foolish to expect the (R)'s to do what they would not do.

The Dems know fully what and who the Republicans are. They are no longer a mystery. They have exposed themselves as anti-country, and are self serving. "PERIOD"!

What were the (D)'s when they refused to impeach Clinton?

 

[BWK]

Yes he does, just like Democrats had an entirely different opinion when Clinton was getting impeached. Want to hear what they said back then????

Yea...that lying about a private sexual affair is not something a President should be removed from office for

Judges hate when you lie in their courts after swearing to tell the truth. Bubba, being a lawyer, knew that.

Except a judge would be lying if he or she ignores the actual evidence exposed by the witnesses. And there are a lot of witnesses, while some need to be heard from and have not. Is the judge going to turn it into a sham to protect a criminal? We will soon see. We are going to see in all its ugliness, the true spirit for treason, when the Republicans flush this investigation down the toilet to protect a criminal. Who, for the second time was trying to cheat the American people out of a free and fair election.

That has nothing to do with Bubba lying under oath, the real reason for his impeachment.

And nice how you're already setting up excuses for when this whole thing goes down in flames and Trump runs the whole campaign season on, "not guilty", or better yet, "aquitted". You're willing to accuse the Republicans of unfairly protecting someone you consider a criminal, but have no problem with the kangaroo court that confirmed your already set opinion that he was guilty.

Evidence confirmed Trump's guilt through a dozen plus witnesses and Trump's own admission. Yea, republicans protect criminals now. It's what they do. They could give two shits about the rule of law if it means protecting their own selfish ends. You and the rest have fooled no one. We know the game and the drill now. Proceed as you always do. Shitting on this country.