‘Likely To Give Birth Any Day’: Ruben Gallego Served Pregnant Wife With Divorce Papers. She Was Blindsided.

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,549
Reaction score
57,744
Points
2,290
OMG.

Where do Democrats keep finding such scum? Such nasty, women haters, like Kamala's hubby as well.



The Arizona Democrat also wanted his ex-wife, Kate Gallego, to pay his attorney’s fees​



 
Idk who that is, but he's a piece of shit if that's his baby.
 
OMG.

Where do Democrats keep finding such scum? Such nasty, women haters, like Kamala's hubby as well.



The Arizona Democrat also wanted his ex-wife, Kate Gallego, to pay his attorney’s fees







Are you kidding? This sounds like what a USMB democrat would post. A story from 2016. C'mon man.
 
Who knows. Not worth my time. I'm sure the divorce is final. How is it relevant to anything eight years later? Meh.
There's an 8 year old running around out there that thinks it's relevant.

Also, this is in the current news cycle for whatever reason. :dunno:

I reckon cuz it's Kari Lake's opponent. I say he's a scumbag and should have waited.
 
Last edited:
There's an 8 year old running around out there that thinks it's relevant.

Also, this is in the current news cycle for whatever reason. :dunno:

I reckon cuz it's Kari Lake's opponent. I say he's a scumbag and should have waited.
Divorces happen and they aren't political. The children always suffer. You're preaching to the choir. However, an eight year old divorce action in the US is hardly news. I am not trying to take sides either way, I just don't think it is relevant to any election.
 
More Glass Houses from Republicans

hint……the guy you are running for President was banging Centerfolds while his wife was pregnant
 
Divorces happen and they aren't political. The children always suffer. You're preaching to the choir. However, an eight year old divorce action in the US is hardly news. I am not trying to take sides either way, I just don't think it is relevant to any election.
Would you spring a divorce on your wife when she's 8 1/2 mos pregnant?
That's something no self-respecting man would ever do, IMO.
That's not being a man at all. That's being a selfish boy.
That's messed up. I say his man card's revoked just like a guy that would squeal on a bro because he's trying to get into his bro's girl's pants.
 
Would you spring a divorce on your wife when she's 8 1/2 mos pregnant?
That's something no self-respecting man would ever do, IMO.
That's not being a man at all. That's being a selfish boy.
No argument. But it isn't relevant to anything. LOL, how about CA entertaining the idea of releasing Scott Peterson after he murdered his wife, Lacey and their unborn child days before Christmas? Terrible things, but not really relevant. Just more smear politics.
 
There's an 8 year old running around out there that thinks it's relevant.

Also, this is in the current news cycle for whatever reason. :dunno:

I reckon cuz it's Kari Lake's opponent. I say he's a scumbag and should have waited.
She could have had a late term abortion.
 
Would you spring a divorce on your wife when she's 8 1/2 mos pregnant?
That's something no self-respecting man would ever do, IMO.
That's not being a man at all. That's being a selfish boy.
That's messed up. I say his man card's revoked just like a guy that would squeal on a bro because he's trying to get into his bro's girl's pants.
If you thought it may not be yours. Most states if divorce is not in process before the child is born the married man is presumed the father. In other words you pay child support regardless of whether or not the child is yours. In my state this is the case can not speak for his state.
 
If you thought it may not be yours. Most states if divorce is not in process before the child is born the married man is presumed the father. In other words you pay child support regardless of whether or not the child is yours. In my state this is the case can not speak for his state.
Most likely it's his kid and he knows it and still did that. Un-uh. :nono:
Man card=revoked.
 
Most likely it's his kid and he knows it and still did that. Un-uh. :nono:
Man card=revoked.
Well we really do not know. One thing that leads me to believe it may not have been his was the fact that his wife in her original filing applied for spousal maintenance and then waved it. Never met a woman that would wave such a thing unless something waved over her head to stop it. Like her also being an elected official and not wanting her illegitimate child on the six o'clock news. Just not how women are built these days. They know they can torch us and like it. Believe me when I say I have first hand experience in this. If his kid though ya man card revoked.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom