Libs at salon write another pro pedophile piece

[ClosedCaption]

Why would they even post that story if they didn't support what he said? All it was recognition for that fuckin pervert. Salon is basically a tabloid. Even their editor-in-chief said that..

So every news story printed means the person who wrote it support it? Like when people reported on 9/11 that means they support taking down the towers?

ALL that was was recognition and advertisement. Salon is a perverted sex tabloid. They consider their stories wanted by their readers. Again, what the EiC said..

Things arent what you say they are just because you say it. Again, So every news story printed means the person who wrote it supports it?

 

[TNHarley]

Their spin on having sex with toddlers = enlightenment

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in the article it advocates or condones any sex with toddlers.

You'll find when you actually read the article.....that the only one equating enlightenment with having sex with children.....is you. Citing yourself,.

Tell us volumes about the wasteland of your mind. And nothing about Salon.

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

I fell in love with my teacher when I was in the 10th grade. Never did get to have sex with her.

You are taking up for him you stupid ****

 

[Skylar]

Of course they matter if you choose to educate yourself. If you prefer to remain ignorant they wouldnt matter.

Their spin on having sex with toddlers = enlightenment

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in the article it advocates or condones any sex with toddlers.

You'll find when you actually read the article.....that the only one equating enlightenment with having sex with children.....is you. Citing yourself,.

Tell us volumes about the wasteland of your mind. And nothing about Salon.

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

 

[TNHarley]

Their spin on having sex with toddlers = enlightenment

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in the article it advocates or condones any sex with toddlers.

You'll find when you actually read the article.....that the only one equating enlightenment with having sex with children.....is you. Citing yourself,.

Tell us volumes about the wasteland of your mind. And nothing about Salon.

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..
He is a self branded pedophile.
LOL you stupid ****

 

[Skylar]

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in the article it advocates or condones any sex with toddlers.

You'll find when you actually read the article.....that the only one equating enlightenment with having sex with children.....is you. Citing yourself,.

Tell us volumes about the wasteland of your mind. And nothing about Salon.

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

 

[Syriusly]

“I’m not a monster”: A pedophile on attraction, love and a life of loneliness

Libs can't deny anymore that pedos will be a group libs will demand acceptance of

Why can't we?

As a liberal I can say that I will not demand anything for pedophiles.

I will even point out that you are the one who seems obsessed with them.

 

[Syriusly]

They are trying to normalize pedophilia and the liberal coclsuckers on here attack me

Who is trying to 'normalize pedophilia'?

And how are your little feelings being hurt?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A website called Virtuous Pedophiles? .....oh boy, those two words should never be used together

 

[The Irish Ram]

I'm a lib and i dont accept pedos having the right to do anything with children. Thread fail.

Not a fail:

On January 14 of this year, the Los Angeles Times ran an article entitled, “Many researchers taking a different view of pedophilia: Pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a deep-rooted predisposition that does not change.” (Emphasis in original.) The piece starts out with a story about one Paul Christiano, who, as a young child, was fascinated by girls and loved “how their spindly bodies tumbled in gymnastics,” wrote the paper. We’re then told that while Christiano grew up, his sexual tastes didn’t: He remained tormented by an attraction to pre-pubescent girls. Christiano is the “sympathetic character,” mind you, the hapless soul meant to put a human face on pedophilia. But now consider what he said about unsuccessful court-ordered therapy he was forced to undergo after being caught with child pornography in 1999. As the Times reported, “‘These people felt they could snuff out the desire, or shame me into denying it existed,’ he said. ‘But it’s as intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality.’”

“As intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality… ” Where have we heard that before? And the paper then does something else that should sound familiar. It gives Christiano’s claim the imprimatur of science, writing: In the laboratory, researchers are coming to the same conclusion.

Like many forms of sexual deviance, pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a sexual orientation as immutable as heterosexuality or homosexuality. It is a deep-rooted predisposition — limited almost entirely to men — that becomes clear during puberty and does not change....

Why, it's no different than being gay! Just another inborn orientation. They were born that way. And should be looked upon with tolerance, support and hugs. They also have a right to the "little girls" room by the way.
Parents, these are the New Americans. It is time to start accompanying your children to the restrooms.
The Slippery Slope to Pedophilia

 

[Asclepias]

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us where in the article it advocates or condones any sex with toddlers.

You'll find when you actually read the article.....that the only one equating enlightenment with having sex with children.....is you. Citing yourself,.

Tell us volumes about the wasteland of your mind. And nothing about Salon.

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

I fell in love with my teacher when I was in the 10th grade. Never did get to have sex with her.

You are taking up for him you stupid ****

You are fantasizing with him you sick person.

 

[TNHarley]

. All that article did was post his sensitivity and his blog for perverts. Oh and a link to the rest of his perverted story.
You do the math.

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

 

[Asclepias]

I'm a lib and i dont accept pedos having the right to do anything with children. Thread fail.

Not a fail:

On January 14 of this year, the Los Angeles Times ran an article entitled, “Many researchers taking a different view of pedophilia: Pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a deep-rooted predisposition that does not change.” (Emphasis in original.) The piece starts out with a story about one Paul Christiano, who, as a young child, was fascinated by girls and loved “how their spindly bodies tumbled in gymnastics,” wrote the paper. We’re then told that while Christiano grew up, his sexual tastes didn’t: He remained tormented by an attraction to pre-pubescent girls. Christiano is the “sympathetic character,” mind you, the hapless soul meant to put a human face on pedophilia. But now consider what he said about unsuccessful court-ordered therapy he was forced to undergo after being caught with child pornography in 1999. As the Times reported, “‘These people felt they could snuff out the desire, or shame me into denying it existed,’ he said. ‘But it’s as intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality.’”

“As intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality… ” Where have we heard that before? And the paper then does something else that should sound familiar. It gives Christiano’s claim the imprimatur of science, writing: In the laboratory, researchers are coming to the same conclusion.

Like many forms of sexual deviance, pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a sexual orientation as immutable as heterosexuality or homosexuality. It is a deep-rooted predisposition — limited almost entirely to men — that becomes clear during puberty and does not change....

Why, it's no different than being gay! Just another inborn orientation. They were born that way. And should be looked upon with tolerance, support and hugs. They also have a right to the "little girls" room by the way.
Parents, these are the New Americans. It is time to start accompanying your children to the restrooms.
The Slippery Slope to Pedophilia

yes its a fail. Nothing in the article condones molesting a child. Your post is also a fail.

 

[Skylar]

So you admit that the only one equating enlightenment with molesting toddlers....is you citing yourself.

Okay, you sick, perverted ****. Next question. Where did the article mention a thing about 'sex with toddlers'?

Let me guess.....its just you citing yourself again.

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

That quote:

"Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler.."

Show us where he ever said he 'fucked a toddler'. Or there is the slightest mention of it in the article.

You're just revealing yourself, you perverted ****.

 

[TNHarley]

OMG it said as an adult he fell in love with a fuckin 5 year old, you big bag of dumbfuck!

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

That quote:

"Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler.."

Show us where he ever said he 'fucked a toddler'. Or there is the slightest mention of it in the article.

You're just revealing yourself, you perverted ****.

It was sarcasm dumbass. Who would come out and say the screw kids? Are you really this fuckin dense?

 

[Skylar]

I'm a lib and i dont accept pedos having the right to do anything with children. Thread fail.

Not a fail:

On January 14 of this year, the Los Angeles Times ran an article entitled, “Many researchers taking a different view of pedophilia: Pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a deep-rooted predisposition that does not change.” (Emphasis in original.) The piece starts out with a story about one Paul Christiano, who, as a young child, was fascinated by girls and loved “how their spindly bodies tumbled in gymnastics,” wrote the paper. We’re then told that while Christiano grew up, his sexual tastes didn’t: He remained tormented by an attraction to pre-pubescent girls. Christiano is the “sympathetic character,” mind you, the hapless soul meant to put a human face on pedophilia. But now consider what he said about unsuccessful court-ordered therapy he was forced to undergo after being caught with child pornography in 1999. As the Times reported, “‘These people felt they could snuff out the desire, or shame me into denying it existed,’ he said. ‘But it’s as intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality.’”

“As intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality… ” Where have we heard that before? And the paper then does something else that should sound familiar. It gives Christiano’s claim the imprimatur of science, writing: In the laboratory, researchers are coming to the same conclusion.

Like many forms of sexual deviance, pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a sexual orientation as immutable as heterosexuality or homosexuality. It is a deep-rooted predisposition — limited almost entirely to men — that becomes clear during puberty and does not change....

Why, it's no different than being gay! Just another inborn orientation. They were born that way. And should be looked upon with tolerance, support and hugs. They also have a right to the "little girls" room by the way.
Parents, these are the New Americans. It is time to start accompanying your children to the restrooms.
The Slippery Slope to Pedophilia

And where in the article did it advocate or condone sex with kids?

 

[Skylar]

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

That quote:

"Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler.."

Show us where he ever said he 'fucked a toddler'. Or there is the slightest mention of it in the article.

You're just revealing yourself, you perverted ****.

It was sarcasm dumbass. Who would come out and say the screw kids? Are you really this fuckin dense?

So you admit that your sole source equating sex with toddlers with 'enlightenment'....is yourself.

You sick ****.

 

[Asclepias]

Um, Shit Stain? Did you read the part where he never abused the kid in any way?

So where, you sick, perverted ****, is there the slightest mention of sex with toddlers? Or equating enlightenment with sex with toddlers?

No where. Both are the product of your mind.

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

That quote:

"Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler.."

Show us where he ever said he 'fucked a toddler'. Or there is the slightest mention of it in the article.

You're just revealing yourself, you perverted ****.

It was sarcasm dumbass. Who would come out and say the screw kids? Are you really this fuckin dense?

Yeah sure. No one believes that for a minute. You were fantasizing you sick ****.

 

[TNHarley]

Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler..

Laughing.....show us the quote, Shit Stain.

All you're doing is revealing your own fantasies, your own mind. As there's no such admission in that article.

what quote?

That quote:

"Because he would publically say he fucked a toddler.."

Show us where he ever said he 'fucked a toddler'. Or there is the slightest mention of it in the article.

You're just revealing yourself, you perverted ****.

It was sarcasm dumbass. Who would come out and say the screw kids? Are you really this fuckin dense?

So you admit that your sole source equating sex with toddlers with 'enlightenment'....is yourself.

You sick ****.

LOL ok
asslips was implying pedophiles POV would be enlightenment. Only the ignorant would deny it, he said.
You sick ****

 

[The Irish Ram]

I fell in love with my teacher when I was in the 10th grade. Never did get to have sex with her.

Was she a 5 year old at the time?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I fell in love with my teacher when I was in the 10th grade. Never did get to have sex with her.

Was she a 5 year old at the time?

The dude in this article is a sick fugger.