Libs Ask When Trump Will Release His College Transcripts; He'll Release Them If Obama Releases His

[S.J.]

LOL.....once again- Birthers believing con-men and lies and innuendo- rather than the State of Hawaii.

The con man is Obama.

Still looking for that proof that Nixon never attended college as a foreign exchange student.

Which only shows how utterly stupid you are.

 

[Pogo]

LOL.....once again- Birthers believing con-men and lies and innuendo- rather than the State of Hawaii.

The con man is Obama.

Still looking for that proof that Nixon never attended college as a foreign exchange student.

Which only shows how utterly stupid you are.

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

 

[Moonglow]

What the **** is the big deal about seeing college transcripts.. I mean ****, do we need to check what brand of undies he wears also..Whe you get a job, do you have to show a GED certificate?

 

[Moonglow]

LOL.....once again- Birthers believing con-men and lies and innuendo- rather than the State of Hawaii.

The con man is Obama.

Still looking for that proof that Nixon never attended college as a foreign exchange student.

Which only shows how utterly stupid you are.

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

The air is thick tonight...

 

[Pogo]

What the **** is the big deal about seeing college transcripts.. I mean ****, do we need to check what brand of undies he wears also..Whe you get a job, do you have to show a GED certificate?

I never heard of "college transcripts" until the black guy O'bama was elected.

Never heard of Birferism either. Even though nobody's ever seen George H.W. Bush's.

 

[S.J.]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

 

[Pogo]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

 

[S.J.]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

 

[Pogo]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

 

[S.J.]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

 

[Pogo]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

 

[S.J.]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

 

[Syriusly]

LOL.....once again- Birthers believing con-men and lies and innuendo- rather than the State of Hawaii.

The con man is Obama..

Despite you and every Birthers absolute failure to prove that.

Meanwhile- Birthers believe convicted con-men who offer to sell them 'birth certificates' from Kenya.....LOL

 

[Pogo]

No?
Why not?

You're actually correct about the number, though not for the reason you think. The next POTUS will indeed be the 44th.

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

 

[Syriusly]

It'll all get straightened out after Trump is sworn in as our 45th President (44th, actually, since the current one is not legitimate).

LOL.....Birthers always cling to the most ludicrous hopes........no matter how many times they end up being wrong....

 

[S.J.]

Yeah? Why don't you school us all then?

The Presidents whitehouse.gov

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

You've been reduced to rambling incoherently, then act like you've said something profound and intelligent. Tell us again how you're right and renowned historians are wrong about how many presidents we've had and tell us how H.W. had a hand in the J.F.K. assassination, like you claimed in another desperate post. I can use a good laugh and you're good for a lot of 'em. Carry on, I'll go get some popcorn.

 

[Pogo]

Be glad to. O'bama is the 43rd POTUS, not the 44th. Shrub was 42 and his father 40, not "Bush 41/43" as they're commonly called. The miscount goes back to 1892 when Grover Cleveland won his second term; for reasons no one can explain, Grover Cleveland's second term is counted as one President while Grover Cleveland's first term is counted as another, apparently on the basis they were nonconsecutive. However the fact remains, Grover Cleveland, and Grover Cleveland -- were the same person. No other POTUS is counted twice, once for each term. Thus Grover Cleveland was the 22nd POTUS. And when he came back to office, he was still the 22nd POTUS.

Now then -- why is "the current one not legitimate"? Was there some SCOTUS recount I missed?

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

You've been reduced to rambling incoherently, then act like you've said something profound and intelligent. Tell us again how you're right and renowned historians are wrong about how many presidents we've had and tell us how H.W. had a hand in the J.F.K. assassination, like you claimed in another desperate post. I can use a good laugh and you're good for a lot of 'em. Carry on, I'll go get some popcorn.

I'm afraid I've never posted any such thing. If I had you could quote it. But like the current question.... crickets.

Poor SJ. Painted hisself into yet another corner.

 

[S.J.]

Right there in front of you and you STILL don't get it. What an idiot!

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

You've been reduced to rambling incoherently, then act like you've said something profound and intelligent. Tell us again how you're right and renowned historians are wrong about how many presidents we've had and tell us how H.W. had a hand in the J.F.K. assassination, like you claimed in another desperate post. I can use a good laugh and you're good for a lot of 'em. Carry on, I'll go get some popcorn.

I'm afraid I've never posted any such thing. If I had you could quote it. But like the current question.... crickets.

Poor SJ. Painted hisself into yet another corner.

Any such thing? I know, you've never posted anything profound and intelligent. Finally something we can agree on.

 

[Pogo]

"Labels and name calling are simply a distraction, it doesn't help your argument any, just shows your desperation."

So you have no answer? I gave an answer, you didn't. Typical.

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

You've been reduced to rambling incoherently, then act like you've said something profound and intelligent. Tell us again how you're right and renowned historians are wrong about how many presidents we've had and tell us how H.W. had a hand in the J.F.K. assassination, like you claimed in another desperate post. I can use a good laugh and you're good for a lot of 'em. Carry on, I'll go get some popcorn.

I'm afraid I've never posted any such thing. If I had you could quote it. But like the current question.... crickets.

Poor SJ. Painted hisself into yet another corner.

Any such thing? I know, you've never posted anything profound and intelligent. Finally something we can agree on.

So you can't do it.

That's exactly what I said.

 

[S.J.]

Oh yeah, you're right and the historians are wrong. I didn't have to give an answer, it's right there. You're just too stupid to grasp it.

How come you're still posting, since you have no answer?

Historians are not wrong -- contemporaries are wrong.

Pop quiz: How many names are in this list?

1. Grover Cleveland

{end of list}
​

Hey, I know. Maybe Grover Cleveland had a birth certificate ---- but Grover Cleveland didn't.

You've been reduced to rambling incoherently, then act like you've said something profound and intelligent. Tell us again how you're right and renowned historians are wrong about how many presidents we've had and tell us how H.W. had a hand in the J.F.K. assassination, like you claimed in another desperate post. I can use a good laugh and you're good for a lot of 'em. Carry on, I'll go get some popcorn.

I'm afraid I've never posted any such thing. If I had you could quote it. But like the current question.... crickets.

Poor SJ. Painted hisself into yet another corner.

Any such thing? I know, you've never posted anything profound and intelligent. Finally something we can agree on.

So you can't do it.

That's exactly what I said.

Which one are you denying, that the historians are wrong and you're right about the number of presidents or you implementing George H.W. Bush in the JFK assassination?