" Working Wrights Writing Rite Fixations "
* A Moor Awl More All it Tea Oar Morality Transcendental Social Norms *
Oh horse shit- you can play word games all day long- that's usually called deflecting or straw man- the initiation of force, using an excuse, is still immoral.
Certainly , not all force whether offensive or defensive is illegitimate ; why would an initiation of force not be either legitimate aggression or illegitimate aggression ?
The precepts from naturalism stipulate a carnal basis within nature ; the precepts for anthropocentric theology often stipulate a carnal basis within hue mammon as member of nature .
The anthropocentric theology presumes by divination to set social norms of order and named it natural law ( law against nature ) as divine law ; the anthropcentric science presumes by hue mammon to set social norms of order and named it natural law ( law from nature ) as hue mammon law .
A carnal basis may be characterized by representation as a quality of geometric bias with a substantive indifference to even outcomes .
Aside from deities conceived as psychopomps for genetic perpetutity , which religions comply with non violence principles that stipulate self defense as legitimate aggression , and which religions comply with non aggression principles that stipulate a tenet of creed for benevolence and against malevolent aggression ?
* Iconified Clarification Heuristically There To Decide *
Coercion, or intimidation is just what it says- words mean things.
A coercion or intimidation granting an adult individual the free roam , free association and progeneration articles in the self ownership element for individualism , or granting an adult individual the private property , willful intents and valid contract articles in the self determination element of individualism , would be considered legitimate aggression .
A coercion or intimidation denying an adult individual the free roam , free association and progeneration articles in the self ownership element for individualism , or granting an adult individual the private property , willful intents and valid contract articles in the self determination element of individualism , would be considered illegitimate legitimate aggression .
Prior to entering into a social civil contract as a greater individual of state , individuals are subject to natural freedoms , and to improve ones opportunity to perpetuate life and improve quality of life , individuals exchange their natural freedoms for membership in a social civil contract - a constitution .
A social civil contract - a constitution with a requisite for non violence principles would promote individualism over collectivism , whereas a social civil contract - a constitution with a requisite for non aggression principles would promote collectivism over individualism .
* Stick To The Plan Of Espousing Individualism Over Collectivism Based On Updated Terminology *
As does provoking- and stop with the Obama negative liberty shit- negative is the opposite of liberty. Period. "legitimate" is just an excuse to legalize, or justify an act.
The content being offered are tools to be applied as it clearly stipulates which are the elements entitled to individualism , though collectivism may be weighing in with a heavy hand .