ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,617
- 54,464
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #101
Whate ever, dude. You're assumption is also duly noted, and you're avoiding Reid. got itYeah, you're right, but Harry Reid did open the door for the change.We all remember this. He rolled the dice and crapped out. If it was still 60 votes to confirm a judge, none of Trumpās judges would have been confirmed. THAT SHIT IS ON THE DEMS. THOSE ASSHOLES CHANGED THE RULES.
Reid triggers ānuclear optionā to change Senate rules, end repeat filibusters
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid triggered the rarely used ānuclear optionā to change the Senate rules.thehill.com
Untrue. Democrats did not get rid of the 60 vote requirement for Supreme Court justices. Republicans did that. The change was for lower cfourt justices and other federal appointments which was being blocked by Republicans.
Fact check: GOP ended Senate filibuster on Supreme Court nominees (usatoday.com)
It wouldn't have happened without his boneheaded decision.
Sullshit. McConnell would have done it anyway. He is corrupt to the core.
It was McConnell, not Reid...NO MATTER WHAT REID SAYS!
Harry Reid: I absolutely do not regret changing the Senate rules - CNN Video
Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tells CNN's Chris Cuomo he does not regret changing the rules to eliminate the need for 60 votes to end debate over judicial nominations, which some argue paved the way for Sen. Mitch McConnell to confirm President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee.
www.cnn.com