Liberals are supporting and encouraging violence against Trump

[Disir]

The thread premise is a lie, and any conservative who propagates it is a liar, which comes as no surprise, of course.

If it's one thing I can't stand, it's a liar:

At least 35 arrested after Trump rally in San Diego | Fox News

Question----------> How many times have Republicans, conservatives, or libertarians stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight? Bernie rally anyone? And when they did, (they didn't) carried the flag of another nation to show support for that nation, and not America?

You lefties should be ASHAMED to even try and spin this whole thing as being ok. You can stand for what you stand for, and we will fight to GIVE YOU the RIGHT to publicly stand for it, because this is America. But you people? You people! You people make excuses for those who would deny others of free speech and assembly, and make EXCUSES for the anti-American rhetoric. YOU are the Nazis, the totalitarians, the socialists/communists, and it is obvious by your ignorant behavior, and lame excuses for those you agree with who try to deny political freedom in this country.

I do not believe that Republicans have stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight even one time.

Violence at rallies or political events is not OK.

Anything else?

Thanks for the response. Your honesty may cause you to lose credibility though with any true libs on the board.

No. Let me explain what you are seeing, if I may.

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters. It is an embarrassment and doesn't advance the discussion. It is a net negative for those who are politically aligned with the protesters.

Now....some who are fundamentally opposed to the aggression and are embarrassed by it....come here and read these threads where people take liberty with the facts and accuse them of "supporting" the aggression. Naturally.....being human and flawed.....these people dig in and try to defend themselves against the false charge.

What results is the accusers then.....again inaccurately....accuse them of "defending" the violent protesters. There are, in fact, defending themselves. In doing so, they may go too far and offer some weak reason for the violence.....thereby giving some credibility to the formerly false charge that they are defending the violent protesters.

It is a foolish, predictable and unrstandable circle jerk.

Are you kidding me? That's pretty much 99% of the threads.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Whatever. It's just a word. I'm still waiting for you to tell me who taught you the word "kotow" referring to bowing customs in Japan.

 

[Disir]

Hey freewilly, I found you a right wing hater. He wants to split us apart.

You hate your fellow Americans like that also?

Not hate at all. But if liberals hate Republicans so much that they resort to this kind of violence, then maybe it is time to split up.

I mother didn't hate us as children when we were fighting, she just knew the only sensible solution to peace and happiness was to make us play in different rooms.

It worked every time.

Follow the money.

 

[kaz]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Actually, he used truncated wrong though. I would have had to use the first words in his quote and cut off the rest to truncate it. I quoted from the middle of his post so it wasn't a truncated quote

 

[LoneLaugher]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

First of all, it's ridiculous to expect your entire post to be in every quote. No one has or should have that rule on message boards anywhere. And second, I quoted the point I was addressing. Nothing you put in the rest of it changed the point I quoted.

You said no one is condoning acts of violence by the protesters, the left across the country clearly is condoning acts of violence straight up. They see video of the police having to put up barricades to keep the protesters from attacking Trump rallies and it has no effect. They see leftists blocking roads and physically stopping Trump supporters from going to rallies and don't care. The left is doing more than condoning violence, they are in favor of it. There is nothing liberal about the left in this country

Please direct me to a quote by any "lefty" of influence or significance who has spoken about the violence in an approving manner.

Can you do that?

I explained what you are mistaking for supporting violence. You should try to learn.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Actually, he used truncated wrong though. I would have had to use the first words in his quote and cut off the rest to truncate it. I quoted from the middle of his post so it wasn't a truncated quote

You sure do take pride in being wrong.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Both on this board and across the US Liberals are in support of violence directed at Trump and his supporters. It is shameful and it will have consequences. As deafening silence comes from the White House and from those running for the democratic party nomination. This will cause those on the fence to come off of it in support of a man they may not know if they support or not. It proves that Illegals and liberals are arm in arm in an attempt to silence the very bedrock of our election process.

There is no parallel with the right. No right wing group has mounted dozens of attacks against police and peaceful political rallies.

Remember when the left claimed the Tea party was violent? They could not actually find any examples other then fabricated ones but there was much gnashing of teeth and calls for the Government to step in.

Obama is part of this violence he has spoken against Trump at several events and has encouraged the violence by his silence and his own attacks. As has Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Further the left wing press has claimed that the violence being perpetrated AGAINST Trump is some how his own fault. While saying nothing against or about the unlawful threats damage and attacks by left wing radicals.

You want war, keep it up you may just get it.

lol, Trump is a clear and present danger.

 

[imawhosure]

The thread premise is a lie, and any conservative who propagates it is a liar, which comes as no surprise, of course.

If it's one thing I can't stand, it's a liar:

At least 35 arrested after Trump rally in San Diego | Fox News

Question----------> How many times have Republicans, conservatives, or libertarians stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight? Bernie rally anyone? And when they did, (they didn't) carried the flag of another nation to show support for that nation, and not America?

You lefties should be ASHAMED to even try and spin this whole thing as being ok. You can stand for what you stand for, and we will fight to GIVE YOU the RIGHT to publicly stand for it, because this is America. But you people? You people! You people make excuses for those who would deny others of free speech and assembly, and make EXCUSES for the anti-American rhetoric. YOU are the Nazis, the totalitarians, the socialists/communists, and it is obvious by your ignorant behavior, and lame excuses for those you agree with who try to deny political freedom in this country.

I do not believe that Republicans have stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight even one time.

Violence at rallies or political events is not OK.

Anything else?

Thanks for the response. Your honesty may cause you to lose credibility though with any true libs on the board.

No. Let me explain what you are seeing, if I may.

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters. It is an embarrassment and doesn't advance the discussion. It is a net negative for those who are politically aligned with the protesters.

Now....some who are fundamentally opposed to the aggression and are embarrassed by it....come here and read these threads where people take liberty with the facts and accuse them of "supporting" the aggression. Naturally.....being human and flawed.....these people dig in and try to defend themselves against the false charge.

What results is the accusers then.....again inaccurately....accuse them of "defending" the violent protesters. There are, in fact, defending themselves. In doing so, they may go too far and offer some weak reason for the violence.....thereby giving some credibility to the formerly false charge that they are defending the violent protesters.

It is a foolish, predictable and unrstandable circle jerk.

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Hillary, Bernie, Obama, and the left leaning media are using the "mini skirt" defense, and that is EMBARRASING!

What is the "mini skirt" defense? It goes like this------------> a woman is raped walking down the street, and her attackers defense is that it was HER fault for being scantily clad, meaning she was the cause of her own rape!

That is exactly what the left and media is saying--------->Trump and his supporters are bringing this all on themselves by their rhetoric, basically the phony "mini skirt" defense.

Lets all face reality-----------> the rapist wanted some of that woman, just like the protestors want a piece of Trump supporters. What they have in common, is BOTH sets of criminals point at the victims, and blame them. What they do NOT have in common is----------> A sitting President, and 2 Presidential candidates going along with the fantasy publicly, and a bunch of screwballs buying into it!

 

[kaz]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

First of all, it's ridiculous to expect your entire post to be in every quote. No one has or should have that rule on message boards anywhere. And second, I quoted the point I was addressing. Nothing you put in the rest of it changed the point I quoted.

You said no one is condoning acts of violence by the protesters, the left across the country clearly is condoning acts of violence straight up. They see video of the police having to put up barricades to keep the protesters from attacking Trump rallies and it has no effect. They see leftists blocking roads and physically stopping Trump supporters from going to rallies and don't care. The left is doing more than condoning violence, they are in favor of it. There is nothing liberal about the left in this country

Please direct me to a quote by any "lefty" of influence or significance who has spoken about the violence in an approving manner.

Can you do that?

I explained what you are mistaking for supporting violence. You should try to learn.

So just to be clear, in your limited mind the only way to support violence is to specifically say you support violence.

OK, so you go first. Show where Republicans say they hate the poor

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Good thought but won't work. The conservatives will do what they do, build a functioning government the benefits all. Their half will prosper. the Democrats will realize that they have no one to support them and will simply move to the conservative half. Claiming it is their God given right to take what isn't their's to take.

It would be living proof that Socialism is a great system of government until you run out of other peoples money.

I just think it would be great to live in a country without liberals. Lower crime, smaller government, less rules and regulations, a much smaller welfare state, less taxes...... and on their side, the exact opposite.

That's why we would need a very large wall.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Liberals are in support of violence directed at Trump and his supporters.

You mean the way Trump supported violence against anyone who didn't support him - even offering to pay the legal fees of the bullies?

Karma. What went around came around. Deal.

Where is the evidence of Trump supporters gathering together inciting violence towards protestors, throwing rocks or burning personal garments? It would appear that liberals simply don't know how to act in a demonstration of free speech, without acting out n destructive violence against those they disagree with.

 

[xband]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Whatever. It's just a word. I'm still waiting for you to tell me who taught you the word "kotow" referring to bowing customs in Japan.

I don't remember where I learned the word 'kotow'. I think basically it means servitude.

 

[Geaux4it]

Both on this board and across the US Liberals are in support of violence directed at Trump and his supporters. It is shameful and it will have consequences. As deafening silence comes from the White House and from those running for the democratic party nomination. This will cause those on the fence to come off of it in support of a man they may not know if they support or not. It proves that Illegals and liberals are arm in arm in an attempt to silence the very bedrock of our election process.

There is no parallel with the right. No right wing group has mounted dozens of attacks against police and peaceful political rallies.

Remember when the left claimed the Tea party was violent? They could not actually find any examples other then fabricated ones but there was much gnashing of teeth and calls for the Government to step in.

Obama is part of this violence he has spoken against Trump at several events and has encouraged the violence by his silence and his own attacks. As has Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Further the left wing press has claimed that the violence being perpetrated AGAINST Trump is some how his own fault. While saying nothing against or about the unlawful threats damage and attacks by left wing radicals.

You want war, keep it up you may just get it.

Good excuse for Obama to stay in office a 3rd term. He can't let the world suffer under a Trump administration

-Geaux

 

[NYcarbineer]

Complaining about violence?

I thought our 2nd amendment protected our right to take up arms against tyrants...

 

[kaz]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Actually, he used truncated wrong though. I would have had to use the first words in his quote and cut off the rest to truncate it. I quoted from the middle of his post so it wasn't a truncated quote

You sure do take pride in being wrong.

Buy a dictionary. Or better yet, you know you're on the internet. If you don't know what truncated means, you could have found out with no more effort than the post you wrote to say you still don't know what the word you used wrong means

 

[LoneLaugher]

If it's one thing I can't stand, it's a liar:

At least 35 arrested after Trump rally in San Diego | Fox News

Question----------> How many times have Republicans, conservatives, or libertarians stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight? Bernie rally anyone? And when they did, (they didn't) carried the flag of another nation to show support for that nation, and not America?

You lefties should be ASHAMED to even try and spin this whole thing as being ok. You can stand for what you stand for, and we will fight to GIVE YOU the RIGHT to publicly stand for it, because this is America. But you people? You people! You people make excuses for those who would deny others of free speech and assembly, and make EXCUSES for the anti-American rhetoric. YOU are the Nazis, the totalitarians, the socialists/communists, and it is obvious by your ignorant behavior, and lame excuses for those you agree with who try to deny political freedom in this country.

I do not believe that Republicans have stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight even one time.

Violence at rallies or political events is not OK.

Anything else?

Thanks for the response. Your honesty may cause you to lose credibility though with any true libs on the board.

No. Let me explain what you are seeing, if I may.

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters. It is an embarrassment and doesn't advance the discussion. It is a net negative for those who are politically aligned with the protesters.

Now....some who are fundamentally opposed to the aggression and are embarrassed by it....come here and read these threads where people take liberty with the facts and accuse them of "supporting" the aggression. Naturally.....being human and flawed.....these people dig in and try to defend themselves against the false charge.

What results is the accusers then.....again inaccurately....accuse them of "defending" the violent protesters. There are, in fact, defending themselves. In doing so, they may go too far and offer some weak reason for the violence.....thereby giving some credibility to the formerly false charge that they are defending the violent protesters.

It is a foolish, predictable and unrstandable circle jerk.

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Hillary, Bernie, Obama, and the left leaning media are using the "mini skirt" defense, and that is EMBARRASING!

What is the "mini skirt" defense? It goes like this------------> a woman is raped walking down the street, and her attackers defense is that it was HER fault for being scantily clad, meaning she was the cause of her own rape!

That is exactly what the left and media is saying--------->Trump and his supporters are bringing this all on themselves by their rhetoric, basically the phony "mini skirt" defense.

Lets all face reality-----------> the rapist wanted some of that woman, just like the protestors want a piece of Trump supporters. What they have in common, is BOTH sets of criminals point at the victims, and blame them. What they do NOT have in common is----------> A sitting President, and 2 Presidential candidates going along with the fantasy publicly, and a bunch of screwballs buying into it!

Incorrect. They are not saying that at all. They have clearly stated that there is no excuse for violence at these events.

I know you want that to be the case....and you have heard people saying that Trump's rhetoric is flammable. That is not the same thing as blaming the protester's violence on Trump.

Trump's rhetoric has been incendiary. My saying that is not in any way apologizing for the actions of the protesters.

 

[Iceweasel]

lol, Trump is a clear and present danger.

....to leftists.

 

[kaz]

Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters.

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Whatever. It's just a word. I'm still waiting for you to tell me who taught you the word "kotow" referring to bowing customs in Japan.

I don't remember where I learned the word 'kotow'. I think basically it means servitude.

Do you mean kowtow? That means to cater to or bow. Like the yes man kowtowed to his boss again

 

[LoneLaugher]

Of course they are. The liberal media and the left all over the country, all over this board are doing exactly that. Their argument is basically stop hitting my fist with your face to Trump supporters

Please don't truncate quotes. It is straight up dishonesty. I said much more than that....and you failing to respond to my entire comment shows weakness on your part.

Thanks.

Thanks for using the word truncate that very few people understand. My radar dish was shaped a truncated parabola.

Actually, he used truncated wrong though. I would have had to use the first words in his quote and cut off the rest to truncate it. I quoted from the middle of his post so it wasn't a truncated quote

You sure do take pride in being wrong.

Buy a dictionary. Or better yet, you know you're on the internet. If you don't know what truncated means, you could have found out with no more effort than the post you wrote to say you still don't know what the word you used wrong means

the definition of truncate

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Complaining about violence?

I thought our 2nd amendment protected our right to take up arms against tyrants...

And that's what Trump supporters should start doing.