Liberalism: "It's All About Me"

[Tax Man]

It seems that the libchic is going goofy. Trying to put out a truth by lying. When one reads the ENTIRE article is becomes apparent why she says it is imperative to have fewer children. As for the rest of the loons the earth is only so big and at the rate the cons are using up resources there will be no resources left in 50 years. And for planned Parenthood the majority of the abortions provided are for the religious reich children who though the rhythm method worked. Liberal women go for prenatal care and help with childbirth.

"And for planned Parenthood the majority of the abortions provided are for the religious reich children who though the rhythm method worked. Liberal women go for prenatal care and help with childbirth."


As you clearly know so little, you are probably unaware that Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood with the aim of eradicating the black population.

Eugenics was the Progressive plan to phase out 'undesirables.'


"In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder

You can cut and paste. I do know these things about the origin of PP. What YOU fail to understand is we live in TODAY not the 1920's.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah.

That's a funny one.

Try telling it to the children you abort!

They are called fetuses.

Is the dehumanization also part of the joke?

Why don't you worry about your own business and stay out of others people business. Maybe you want to stop women from aborting your kid.

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

So I guess then its all about you and when you decide if a fetus is a baby. I doubt a fetus has a pursuit of happiness. Mind your own business!! Not any of your business what another women does. You are pushing your beliefs onto others, that is not equality.

My beliefs are based on biology.

A sperm and egg, joined, will usually go on to become a human being.....if Liberals stay out of the way.

 

[Penelope]

That zygote is not a child . But I'll give you that !

Then the baby is born. It's liberals who are for WIC and food stamp assistance to keep the baby healthy . Cons what to cut all that .

If a child in the zygote stage of their life is not a "child" - how do you explain the fact that it has the same parents that it later has when it is finally delivered from the womb?

When did YOUR biological father become YOUR biological father? Mine began at conception.

Crickets

Liberal are more than willing to end the life of another human being simply by defining it out of the category of human life.

Ask them what that embryo, foetus, blastula, unborn, fertilized cell, would become if allowed to continue.....


...and more crickets.

Is it any of your business what other people do? if it is, why is it?

Morality.


Is the concept unfamiliar to you?

None of your business, my life is none of your business. Got it.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

​

On any given day you Liberals vary between vulgarity and dishonesty.

Seems to be your nature.

On any given day the Orange Shitgibbon Trump varies between vulgarity and total in your face dishonesty but yet and still you insist on tossing salad for him

 

[Timmy]

They are called fetuses.

Is the dehumanization also part of the joke?

Why don't you worry about your own business and stay out of others people business. Maybe you want to stop women from aborting your kid.

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

So I guess then its all about you and when you decide if a fetus is a baby. I doubt a fetus has a pursuit of happiness. Mind your own business!! Not any of your business what another women does. You are pushing your beliefs onto others, that is not equality.

My beliefs are based on biology.

A sperm and egg, joined, will usually go on to become a human being.....if Liberals stay out of the way.

Why starts there ? Every sperm is sacred !

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

My beliefs are based on biology.

A sperm and egg, joined, will usually go on to become a human being.....if Liberals stay out of the way.

your beliefs are based on STUPID...humans do not get out of the way they find a way...Contraception is Freedom

 

[Penelope]

They are called fetuses.

Is the dehumanization also part of the joke?

Why don't you worry about your own business and stay out of others people business. Maybe you want to stop women from aborting your kid.

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

So I guess then its all about you and when you decide if a fetus is a baby. I doubt a fetus has a pursuit of happiness. Mind your own business!! Not any of your business what another women does. You are pushing your beliefs onto others, that is not equality.

My beliefs are based on biology.

A sperm and egg, joined, will usually go on to become a human being.....if Liberals stay out of the way.

So you believe in evolution.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Why starts there ? Every sperm is sacred !

you can't go around masturbating and killing off potential humans ...hell no LOL

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

given time your eyes go bad and those liberals then put on glasses and keep on seeing even though nature says "Nay"...bad bad liberals

 

[Tax Man]

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.[/QUOTE]
Who's life and who's happiness? The liberty is about being able to make choices independent of the church or government. I would suggest you take care of your vagina and let others take care of theirs.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah.

That's a funny one.

Try telling it to the children you abort!

They are called fetuses.

Is the dehumanization also part of the joke?

Why don't you worry about your own business and stay out of others people business. Maybe you want to stop women from aborting your kid.

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

You are pro death penalty !!!

And "Liberty" is being in control of your own body .

A developing foetus is not anyone's body but it's own.


Simple enough to prove that:

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yeah.

That's a funny one.

Try telling it to the children you abort!

They are called fetuses.

Is the dehumanization also part of the joke?

Why don't you worry about your own business and stay out of others people business. Maybe you want to stop women from aborting your kid.

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

You are pro death penalty !!!

And "Liberty" is being in control of your own body .

"You are pro death penalty !!! "


The death penalty is for those guilty of a crime.

Of what crime are you claiming the unborn is guilty?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It seems that the libchic is going goofy. Trying to put out a truth by lying. When one reads the ENTIRE article is becomes apparent why she says it is imperative to have fewer children. As for the rest of the loons the earth is only so big and at the rate the cons are using up resources there will be no resources left in 50 years. And for planned Parenthood the majority of the abortions provided are for the religious reich children who though the rhythm method worked. Liberal women go for prenatal care and help with childbirth.

"And for planned Parenthood the majority of the abortions provided are for the religious reich children who though the rhythm method worked. Liberal women go for prenatal care and help with childbirth."


As you clearly know so little, you are probably unaware that Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood with the aim of eradicating the black population.

Eugenics was the Progressive plan to phase out 'undesirables.'


"In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder

You can cut and paste. I do know these things about the origin of PP. What YOU fail to understand is we live in TODAY not the 1920's.

And.....what is the difference you are claiming that now makes murder legal?

 

[PoliticalChic]

given time your eyes go bad and those liberals then put on glasses and keep on seeing even though nature says "Nay"...bad bad liberals

Mussolini was a Fascist, the same political outlook espoused by Liberals/Democrats.

In fact, Democrat/Liberal demigod, Franklin Roosevelt, took Mussolini's program wholesale and forced it on America.

1. English and French commentators routinely depicted Roosevelt as akin to Mussolini. A more specific reason why, in 1933, the New Deal was often compared with Fascism was that with the help of a massive propaganda campaign, Italy had transitioned from a liberal free-market system to a state-run corporatist one. And corporatism was considered by elitists and intellectuals as the perfect response to the collapse of the liberal free-market economy, as was the national self-sufficiency of the Stalinist Soviet Union. The National Recovery Administration was comparable to Mussolini’s corporatism as both had state control without actual expropriation of private property.
   1. Mussolini wrote a book review of Roosevelt’s “Looking Forward,” in which he said “…[as] Roosevelt here calls his readers to battle, is reminiscent of the ways and means by which Fascism awakened the Italian people.” Popolo d’Italia, July 7, 1933.
   2. In 1934, Mussolini wrote a review of “New Frontiers,” by FDR’s Sec’y of Agriculture, later Vice-President, Henry Wallace: “Wallace’s answer to what America wants is as follows: anything but a return tyo the free-market, i.e., anarchistic economy. Where is America headed? This book leaves no doubt that it is on the road to corporatism, the economic system of the current century.” Marco Sedda, Il politico, vol. 64, p. 263.

You appear quite ignorant.

Are you a government school grad?

 

[Tax Man]

And.....what is the difference you are claiming that now makes murder legal?[/QUOTE]To disconnect a parasite or a fetal piece of tissue is not murder it is making a desired life choice for the female. It is not murder like an execution but to religiofanatics it is.

 

[Tax Man]

given time your eyes go bad and those liberals then put on glasses and keep on seeing even though nature says "Nay"...bad bad liberals

Mussolini was a Fascist, the same political outlook espoused by Liberals/Democrats.

In fact, Democrat/Liberal demigod, Franklin Roosevelt, took Mussolini's program wholesale and forced it on America.

1. English and French commentators routinely depicted Roosevelt as akin to Mussolini. A more specific reason why, in 1933, the New Deal was often compared with Fascism was that with the help of a massive propaganda campaign, Italy had transitioned from a liberal free-market system to a state-run corporatist one. And corporatism was considered by elitists and intellectuals as the perfect response to the collapse of the liberal free-market economy, as was the national self-sufficiency of the Stalinist Soviet Union. The National Recovery Administration was comparable to Mussolini’s corporatism as both had state control without actual expropriation of private property.
   1. Mussolini wrote a book review of Roosevelt’s “Looking Forward,” in which he said “…[as] Roosevelt here calls his readers to battle, is reminiscent of the ways and means by which Fascism awakened the Italian people.” Popolo d’Italia, July 7, 1933.
   2. In 1934, Mussolini wrote a review of “New Frontiers,” by FDR’s Sec’y of Agriculture, later Vice-President, Henry Wallace: “Wallace’s answer to what America wants is as follows: anything but a return tyo the free-market, i.e., anarchistic economy. Where is America headed? This book leaves no doubt that it is on the road to corporatism, the economic system of the current century.” Marco Sedda, Il politico, vol. 64, p. 263.

You appear quite ignorant.

Are you a government school grad?

Did you even go to school? Your comments do not indicate any education but a great amount of indoctrination.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Begging for another lesson?

No prob.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.

And based on the above, every real American is pro-life.

Who's life and who's happiness? The liberty is about being able to make choices independent of the church or government. I would suggest you take care of your vagina and let others take care of theirs.[/QUOTE]


No matter what precepts of Liberalism you learned in government school, you are not allowed to kill another human being for your convenience.


Almost all abortions are for convenience.

The vast majority of abortion performed in the United States are carried out for reasons that can be broadly categorized as “matters of convenience.”

Convenience, as in having your groceries delivered rather than having to walk across the street to pick them up.....this level of effort in deciding to execute the child you've created.



In a study of 27 nations, reasons for abortion services were found to be the following:

a. “Worldwide, the most commonly reported reason women cite for having an abortion is to postpone or stop childbearing. The second most common reason—socioeconomic concerns—includes disruption of education or employment; lack of support from the father; desire to provide schooling for existing children; and poverty, unemployment or inability to afford additional children. In addition, relationship problems with a husband or partner and a woman's perception that she is too young constitute other important categories of reasons.” Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries


b. A 2004 study of American women yielded similar results: “The reasons most frequently cited were that having a child would interfere with a woman’s education, work or ability to care for dependents (74%); that she could not afford a baby now (73%); and that she did not want to be a single mother or was having relationship problems (48%). Nearly four in 10 women said they had completed their childbearing, and almost one-third were not ready to have a child. Fewer than 1% said their parents’ or partners’ desire for them to have an abortion was the most important reason. Younger women often reported that they were unprepared for the transition to motherhood, while older women regularly cited their responsibility to dependents.”
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf



c. We must reject the view that inconvenience of a mother’s informed choice outweighs the unalienable right to life of the child she bears by virtue of that choice.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And.....what is the difference you are claiming that now makes murder legal?

To disconnect a parasite or a fetal piece of tissue is not murder it is making a desired life choice for the female. It is not murder like an execution but to religiofanatics it is.[/QUOTE]




Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Did you even go to school? Your comments do not indicate any education but a great amount of indoctrination.

Yes that Trump Bitchette is a proud graduate of the "Trump University" and a football cheerleader/ham sammich maker for Fighting Rubes........

 

[PoliticalChic]

given time your eyes go bad and those liberals then put on glasses and keep on seeing even though nature says "Nay"...bad bad liberals

Mussolini was a Fascist, the same political outlook espoused by Liberals/Democrats.

In fact, Democrat/Liberal demigod, Franklin Roosevelt, took Mussolini's program wholesale and forced it on America.

1. English and French commentators routinely depicted Roosevelt as akin to Mussolini. A more specific reason why, in 1933, the New Deal was often compared with Fascism was that with the help of a massive propaganda campaign, Italy had transitioned from a liberal free-market system to a state-run corporatist one. And corporatism was considered by elitists and intellectuals as the perfect response to the collapse of the liberal free-market economy, as was the national self-sufficiency of the Stalinist Soviet Union. The National Recovery Administration was comparable to Mussolini’s corporatism as both had state control without actual expropriation of private property.
   1. Mussolini wrote a book review of Roosevelt’s “Looking Forward,” in which he said “…[as] Roosevelt here calls his readers to battle, is reminiscent of the ways and means by which Fascism awakened the Italian people.” Popolo d’Italia, July 7, 1933.
   2. In 1934, Mussolini wrote a review of “New Frontiers,” by FDR’s Sec’y of Agriculture, later Vice-President, Henry Wallace: “Wallace’s answer to what America wants is as follows: anything but a return tyo the free-market, i.e., anarchistic economy. Where is America headed? This book leaves no doubt that it is on the road to corporatism, the economic system of the current century.” Marco Sedda, Il politico, vol. 64, p. 263.

You appear quite ignorant.

Are you a government school grad?

Did you even go to school? Your comments do not indicate any education but a great amount of indoctrination.

I'm an Ivy League grad.

Did the Barnum & Baily Clown College give you a diploma, or just that big red nose?