Liberal House Organ Pushes 'Global Warming' Scam

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
126,781
62,579
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
That would be the NYTimes.

It claims that the recent floods/rainfall in Louisiana is a manifestation of the warmists' fantasy.


1. "Torrential rain and severe flooding tragically claimed at least 11 lives in southern Louisiana and affected more than 40,000 homes. Emergency responders and other volunteers rescued more than 30,000 people and 1,000 pets.


2. "Is man-made global warming to blame for the heavy rainfall and flooding in Louisiana? Former Vice President Al Gore sure thinks so.

And The New York Times ran a story with the title “Flooding in the South Looks a Lot Like Climate Change.”


3.....Gore said: “These kinds of record downpours—that’s one of the manifestations of the climate crisis.”

The Times article led with: “Climate change is never going to announce itself by name. But this is what we should expect it to look like.”

But the climate research suggests otherwise.




4. .... two recent studies that indicate not.
In one study, two researchers at the University of Iowa specializing in hydroscience and engineering conclude that “over the last 65 years, the stronger storms are not getting stronger, but a larger number of heavy precipitation events have been observed.”

The larger number of precipitation events, however, were not a result of burning of conventional resources of energy such as coal, oil, and natural gas. The study finds that “the climate variability of both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans can exert a large control on the precipitation frequency and magnitude over the contiguous USA.”

In other words, changes in the ocean are the reason for these increases in precipitation.





5. Another study, published by the American Meteorological Society, analyzes model projections and actual observed trends in heavy precipitation throughout the U.S.

The lead author is Karin van der Wiel of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. Van der Wiel and her team concluded “no evidence was found for changes in extreme precipitation attributable to climate change in the available observed record.”

a. ....a NOAA study from June 1978, when the media and climate concern centered on the next ice age and global cooling. As he puts it: “Lower Louisiana is a climatologically prime location for massive precipitation amounts.”




6. .....globally? After all, man-made warming is supposed to be about global warming, right?

The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found evidence for increases, decreases, and no trend at all in flood activity or severity. The report says:

'In summary, there continues to be a lack of evidence and thus low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale.'


[So....again....Liberal media substitute advocacy for actual reporting. And dunces buy it like it was on sale!]





7. [Soooo.....] the Obama administration’s regulatory climate agenda would be a costly nonsolution.

The higher energy prices paid by Americans from shuttering coal-fired power plants, regulations on oil and gas extraction, and emissions restrictions on vehicles and trucks will be for naught. In fact, cutting off virtually all economic activity and bringing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions down to zero would moderate warming byonly 0.137 degree Celsius over the next 84 years.



8. For the Al Gores of the world, it’s convenient to point to the Louisiana floods, Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Katrina, or the tornado in Joplin, Missouri, as evidence of man-made global warming. The facts, on the other hand, are inconvenient."
Fact: These Floods Not Result of Man-Made Climate Change




OK....cue the "is not, isssss noootttttt!" posts.
 
It must be disappointing for you to realize that you have all those stacks of anti weather change cut and paste articles, and the small group who still agree with you is fading into the woodwork. You still have some supporters, but there aren't enough left to outnumber the average PTA meeting.
 
How many 1000 year floods have we had in the US this year? Texas, Maryland, Louisiana, and West Virginia, and I have probably missed one or two. In the meantime, the drought in California continues, and, depending on whose figures you use, NOAA or NASA, we have had 10 or 14 consecutive hottest months in a row. With number 11 or 15 in the making right now. Three of the hottest years in a row.

There are so many extremes that we have not seen cluster in a short time before. And, when the governments and insurance companies add up the damages at the end of the year, worldwide, we are going to see a new record in weather damage, including fires, way beyond any prior year.
 
How many 1000 year floods have we had in the US this year? Texas, Maryland, Louisiana, and West Virginia, and I have probably missed one or two. In the meantime, the drought in California continues, and, depending on whose figures you use, NOAA or NASA, we have had 10 or 14 consecutive hottest months in a row. With number 11 or 15 in the making right now. Three of the hottest years in a row.

There are so many extremes that we have not seen cluster in a short time before. And, when the governments and insurance companies add up the damages at the end of the year, worldwide, we are going to see a new record in weather damage, including fires, way beyond any prior year.


So were are you getting this 1000 year flood data from?

Cave drawings?
 
LOL No, from Geologists. But then, those are people that actually spend time studying science, not just pulling dumbass comments out of their ass. LOL
 
It must be disappointing for you to realize that you have all those stacks of anti weather change cut and paste articles, and the small group who still agree with you is fading into the woodwork. You still have some supporters, but there aren't enough left to outnumber the average PTA meeting.


Oh, the tons of gold that can be mined from this post!

1. "...you have all those stacks of anti weather change cut and paste articles,..."
The article to which I linked was posted 20 hours ago....hence, it cannot be a part of any 'stack of articles.'

Strike one!


2. "...cut and paste ...."
You've used that phrase as a pejorative (better look that word up)...but it simply describes a method of presentation, and is not a critique of the facts provided.

Strike two!



3. "You still have some supporters, but there aren't enough left to outnumber the average PTA meeting."
Science, and the rectitude (better look that word up) of the OP is not susceptible to consensus....but to the scientific method.
So....the number of individuals who agree to an erroneous view, i.e., global warming, is not indicative (better look that word up) of the authenticity of the view.

Strike three!





You show an inability to judge reality, or to use logic....and the sort of weakness that requires the backing of the mob in order to draw a correct conclusion.
A characteristic of Liberals.
This, due to a lack of education, or a lack of intelligence.
Or both.
 
LOL No, from Geologists. But then, those are people that actually spend time studying science, not just pulling dumbass comments out of their ass. LOL


Could you produce said 1000 year old geologist who has imparted said views to you, you dunce?
 
How do you explain these floods?



Mississippi River Flood Of 1927

Generally considered the most destructive flood of American history, this natural disaster killed 500 people and left 600,000 homeless, according to PBS. It stretched across 15 million acres of land, spanning to Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana.



Johnstown Flood Of 1889

A failed dam is a dangerous way to start a flood, and that's what happened in May of 1889 in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. South Fork Dam failed, releasing 20 million tons of water and killing more than 2,200, according to the Johnstown Flood Museum.

Galveston Flood of 1900

According to the Library of Congress, a whopping 8,000 people died on Sept. 8, 1900, when a hurricane hit Texas and left treacherous flooding behind. Before that flood, Galveston was a booming city, but the natural disaster was crippling.
 


Great Flood of 1844 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Great Flood of 1844
The Great Flood of 1844 is the biggestflood ever recorded on the Missouri River and Upper Mississippi River, inNorth America, in terms of discharge.

The adjusted economic impact was not as great as subsequent floods because of the small population in the region at the time. The flood devastation was particularly widespread since the region had few or no levees at the time, so the waters were able to spread far from the normal banks.

Among the hardest hit in terms of mortality were the Wyandot Indians, who lost 100 people in the diseases that occurred after the flood in the vicinity of today's Kansas City, Kansas—the Wyandot were a people formed from the war and disease depopulated elements of the once mighty Huron Confederacyand the Petun Indian tribes who had migrated south and west.

The flood also placed a major obstacle, a sandbar in front of the Wayne City Landing at Independence, Missouriwhich was to cause and encourage settlers to go further east to Westport Landing in Kansas City causing significant local economic and cultural impact.[1] Independence had been the jumping off place for several keyemigrant trails, prior to 1846 notably both the Santa Fe Trail and one alternative eastern starting branch of the Oregon Trail. After the Mexican–American War settlement of 1846, the Oregon's start quickly also became a start of the California Trail and an alternative beginning also for theMormon Trail (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints migration to Utah).

Congress in 1849 passed the Swamp Act providing land grants to build stronger levees.

The flood also is the highest recorded for the Mississippi River at St. Louis (1,300,000 cubic feet second in 1844 vs. 782,000 in 1951 and 1,030,000 in 1993).

The 1844 flood was the backdrop to the death of Mormon leaders, brothersJoseph and Hyrum Smith, at the hands of a mob numbering over a hundred men in Carthage, Illinois. Carthage is located a bit over ten miles from the Mississippi river and the northern border of Missouri.
 


Bwahaha...







The term 1,000 year flood is based on statistics .....that they gathered in the past 125 years...not any geo evidence.

Dupe




Does a 1,000-year storm really happen every 1,000 years?


Technically the measurement is a probability. A 100-year flood means that there is one chance in 100 of a flood occurring in each year. A 500-year flood means there is 0.2% chance of the flooding or rain event occurring each year and a 1,000-year event has a 0.1% chance of happening in any year.

The computation of the probability starts with data collected by gauges that measure rainfall or the flow of streams, explained Jayme Laber, a hydrologist with the Los Angeles office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The gauges collect “tons of data” over years that can then be sorted into a variety of categories. Rain gauges collect water as it falls; flood or stream gauges collect data as the water flows past.

Using software, the data are then sorted to allow the meteorologist to determine what is typical rainfall in a five-minute burst, or in an one-hour period or any other duration, Laber said.

From those data, meteorologists then extrapolate the probability of a rainfall or flooding event and express it as a number: once in 50 years, 100 years and so on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top