Lib school delays middle school election results bc too many whites won

novasteve

Gold Member
Dec 5, 2011
8,603
873
245
Bellevue
S.F. middle school delays election results because winners not diverse enough

Says school is 80% not white, so the results are unnacceptable though the school libs apparently caved after the story went public on how racist these liberal assholes are.

Can you imagine if a school were 80 percent white and non whites won the elections and the school delayed the results saying it wasn't diverse enough? Liberals would CELEBRATE that election result.


Liberals are not only hypocrites, they are by far the biggest racists in our society.
 
Also by this logic, since the US is majority white, Obama winning the election isn't diverse, and should be invalidated.

Why on earth are these degenerates allowed to teach children? This twat is a racist.
 
It was the white part of Obama that won, didn't you know that? LOL boy oh boy, the racist talk and interest confirms one thing, you can keep the chickens berating the darker chickens so the fox can leave the pen with the loot. If racists were anymore blind swamp land would be the next bubble.

"Let's start with an open secret: Republicans rely on racial entreaties to help win elections. In 2010, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, Michael Steele, acknowledged that "for the last 40-plus years we had a 'Southern Strategy' that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South."! Steele was echoing the remarks of another head of the Republican National Committee, Ken Mehlman. In 2005, he used a speech before the NAACP to admit that his party had exploited racial divisions, and had been wrong to do so. "By the seventies and into the eighties and nineties:' Mehlman said from a prepared text, "Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong,">

These apologies at once confess to racial pandering and also implicitly promise to sin no more. This is a promise that the GOP will struggle to fulfill, for this party is now essentially defined by race: it is almost exclusively supported by and composed of whites. In the 2012 presidential election, 88 percent of the voters who pulled the lever for the GOP candidate were white.' That means that whites made up roughly nine out of every ten persons who threw in with Mitt Romney. Even more startling, among state-level elected Republican officials nationwide, 98 percent are white." Notwithstanding some prominent minority faces pushed to the fore to suggest otherwise, this is a party of white persons.

Yet this open secret receives surprisingly little attention. From conservatives, there's the occasional mea culpa, but much more typically there's a firm insistence that the GOP does not notice race, followed by the outraged retort that any suggestion otherwise is not only unfounded but a contemptible playing of the race card. From the Democratic Party, there's a resounding silence. Even from liberal commentators there's only murmured objections.... " p 1, 'Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class' by Ian Haney López
 
It was the white part of Obama that won, didn't you know that? LOL boy oh boy, the racist talk and interest confirms one thing, you can keep the chickens berating the darker chickens so the fox can leave the pen with the loot. If racists were anymore blind swamp land would be the next bubble.

"Let's start with an open secret: Republicans rely on racial entreaties to help win elections. In 2010, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, Michael Steele, acknowledged that "for the last 40-plus years we had a 'Southern Strategy' that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South."! Steele was echoing the remarks of another head of the Republican National Committee, Ken Mehlman. In 2005, he used a speech before the NAACP to admit that his party had exploited racial divisions, and had been wrong to do so. "By the seventies and into the eighties and nineties:' Mehlman said from a prepared text, "Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong,">

These apologies at once confess to racial pandering and also implicitly promise to sin no more. This is a promise that the GOP will struggle to fulfill, for this party is now essentially defined by race: it is almost exclusively supported by and composed of whites. In the 2012 presidential election, 88 percent of the voters who pulled the lever for the GOP candidate were white.' That means that whites made up roughly nine out of every ten persons who threw in with Mitt Romney. Even more startling, among state-level elected Republican officials nationwide, 98 percent are white." Notwithstanding some prominent minority faces pushed to the fore to suggest otherwise, this is a party of white persons.

Yet this open secret receives surprisingly little attention. From conservatives, there's the occasional mea culpa, but much more typically there's a firm insistence that the GOP does not notice race, followed by the outraged retort that any suggestion otherwise is not only unfounded but a contemptible playing of the race card. From the Democratic Party, there's a resounding silence. Even from liberal commentators there's only murmured objections.... " p 1, 'Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class' by Ian Haney López
:lol:
 
So, "knee-grows" are expected to vote for any candidate with similar ethnicity, and they do so more than 95% of the time. That's not racist, even though they clearly are casting their votes based almost entirely on the race of the candidate.

But if a Caucasian votes for a candidate because the candidate is white, then he is a racist.

Is that about it?
 
The idea that a person cannot represent someone of a different skin color shows the inherent racism of liberalism.

I love the dumbasses who reflexively try to deny that this is about race or liberalism.



"In the echo chamber of the Internet, the Everett Middle School student body election quickly became twisted into the latest salvo in America’s culture war.

“San Fran Middle School Cancels Student Elections Because Too Many White People Elected,” ran a factually incorrect headline on the conservative Web site the Daily Caller.

“Middle School Principal Blocks Student Election Results After Not Enough Minorities Win,” read a slightly less mistaken headline in Mediaite."
 
The "Southern Strategy" was (and is) merely a strategy to counter the phenomenon of racist voting by knee-grows. Ted Cruz' current strategy is to mobilize the votes of millions of politically alienated white people - mainly working-class men - who failed to vote in the past couple elections due to apathy.

The strategy is simple: "No amnesty for illegals. Even if they stay, they will NEVER become voting citizens."

Good enough for me.
 
It's so sad watching the liberals here thinking the racism by the school is completely fine.

Its sad to watch you try to direct the topic to what you want it to be about so hard. This is just more teacher / minority bashing and you saw your chance. Either that or school elections are in your News Alerts
 
m
Teacher and Minority bash thread. A 2 FER!

The minority students appear to have had no problem voting for other students with different skin color, even if they were... WHITE!!!:eek::eek::eek::eek:


Nothing in the OP or this thread is bashing them.

Meanwhile the PRINCIPLE deserves to be "bashed" based on her racist and undemocratic actions.

Do you not agree?
 
m
Teacher and Minority bash thread. A 2 FER!

The minority students appear to have had no problem voting for other students with different skin color, even if they were... WHITE!!!:eek::eek::eek::eek:

Exactly, which should end your butthurt


Err, this thread is about the actions of the Principle who was upset by that fact and the results.

Do you have anything to add to this thread that addresses the Topic?
 

Forum List

Back
Top