- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,599
- 3,605
I see that you demented jackasses are still in your moronic fuck fest feeding frenzy and listening to the bizarre voices in your heads. Try not to hurt yourselves or othersDidn't happen...just a lot of justification and blathering that didn't do anything to negate the fact that leftists groom kids and call it sex ed. Yeah it's sex ed alright...perverts have educated children in depravity since tge beginning of time..Thank you for putting Sassy Ass in her place!!No it is not. The actual study from 2004 was prepared by many independent authors and covers sexual abuse and sexual misconduct from 1993 to 2004. Some of these reports came from UK and Canada also. The US Department of Education clearly shows that this is not a real study since many of the authors used only media headlines as their only source. Direct quote from US Department of Education,Please provide evidence of this assertion of teacher's protecting other pedophile teachers. I will save you the trouble. You can't. I can provide plenty of documentation that most Christian sects have done this. Also it is more than the catholic church that has. The Anglican church in Canada has gone bankrupt with all the litigation problems dealing with this sort of thing. Like I stated, religious people should be the last to point fingers at any organization when it comes to pedophiles. The last.
A child is 100 times more likely to be sexually abused by an educator or school staff than by a priest.
That comes from the US Dept of Education
"The views expressed herein are those of the authors. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred.
U.S. Department of Education Rod Paige Secretary"
https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/misconductreview/report.pdf
Since this study came out many church groups decided to misrepresent the actual study. Life Site used only numbers from one year of only Catholic sexual abuses against the whole study presented to the US Dept of Education. This is why they use terms like likely because in fact there is no actual evidence of what you asserted is remotely true. Here is an example of this type of dishonesty:
“There are laws against failing to report, but the law is almost never enforced. Almost never.”
“What typically happens is you’ll have a teacher who’s spending a little too much time in a room with one child with the door shut,” Kraizer explained. “Another teacher sees it and reports it to the principal. The principal calls the suspected teacher in and says ‘Don’t do that,’ instead of contacting child protective services.”
“Before you know it, the teacher is driving the student home. A whole series of events will unfold, known to other teachers and the principal, and nobody contacts child services before it’s out of control. You see this documented in records after it eventually ends up in court.”
Forgotten Study: Abuse in School 100 Times Worse than by Priests
A teacher being alone in a room with a child is not something that needs to be reported to child protective services. The teacher was told not to do it again and then the author decides to add their own conjecture. These are false representations of studies already limited in real actual documentation by church groups trying to divert attention from their own sexual misconducts.
I will also add that none of this backs up the original content that "the whole purpose is to make kids feel ok about being sexually molested by older same sex partners."
LOL Why is it you live on homo threads? Defending it? The fact is there is a child sexual assault problem in our schools....anyone paying attention knows this. Get your damn head outa your ass