Letter in support of Judge Dugan signed by over 150 former state and federal judges.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Is there any part of the letter that says the charges against Dugan are bogus? No. Once again, since you didn't get it the first time................

It's not so much the legality of what Dugan did that's at issue in the letter. It's the way the regime conducted itself by the method of arresting her. And it's partially about the threats made against members of the judiciary made solely because the orange, bloviating cuck doesn't like having to obey the Constitution.

Now perp walks are bad?
DURR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you are asking whether they violated their oaths of office by plotting to steal an election or whether they defied a subpoena to return stolen, classified documents I'm fairly certain the answer is no.

They were supporting a fellow criminal judge?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The way judges keep pointing out the trump regime is in open defiance of court orders and the Constitution is encouraging.

They should keep protesting by breaking the law.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Are you still here? Perhaps you're a gluten for punishment.

Trump was informed of the possibility of an FBI search by attorney Evan Corcoran, who met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago shortly after the subpoena was issued, ABC News first reported Wednesday.

.

As in..........

I can't eat wheat because I'm a gluten for punishment?

Debating with this member is a case of arguing with a stump.




.

 

[healthmyths]

Wrong.
Arresting judges is not legal.
The proper procedure when you disagree with judges is to appeal.
The SCOTUS has been very clear about that.

Yes, it is generally legal to arrest a judge who actively assists a lawbreaker in resisting arrest. While judges have certain protections, these protections are not absolute and do not shield them from arrest for committing crimes, including aiding and abetting the obstruction of justice.

• 
  
• Judges are not above the law:
  .
  Even though judges hold a high position, they are not exempt from the legal system.They are still subject to arrest for criminal activity, as demonstrated by the case of Judge Hannah Dugan.
  
  
• Obstruction of Justice:
  .
  If a judge actively assists a lawbreaker to resist arrest, they would be considered to be obstructing justice, a criminal offense.
  
  
• Consequences for Judicial Misconduct:
  .
  Judges are held to high standards of conduct, and engaging in such behavior can lead to disciplinary action by the judiciary, civil lawsuits, and even criminal charges.
  
  
• Absolute Immunity vs. Criminal Immunity:
  .

Justice Department Announces Two Cases Involving Judicial Misconduct and Obstruction of Law Enforcement

The Justice Department today announced federal criminal charges in two separate cases involving the alleged obstruction of federal law enforcement operations and unlawful concealment of individuals residing illegally in the United States.

www.justice.gov

Where is YOUR proof that "Arresting judges is not legal."...

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Where is YOUR proof that "Arresting judges is not legal."...

.

The left cult does not need proof.

Well, we'll find out about how much they want proof when they're whining from inside the mental institutions.


.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She broke the law and knew she was doing it. Not much of a judge

 

[theHawk]

The only crime was ICE illegally using a court appearance to arrest a person.

Why would it be illegal for ICE to arrest a person at a court?

Name the law it breaks.

 

[WEATHER53]

Another auto pen ruse forgery

 

[WEATHER53]

Why would it be illegal for ICE to arrest a person at a court?

Name the law it breaks.

The law of feelings
Love for illegals
Hate for American

 

[Nostra]

Dingbat lefttards sign a letter………single digit IQ lefty nutbag OP creams his jorts.


How did that letter signed by 50 former intel people work out for ya, rube?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Why is the OP and other Dimocrats ok with a judge violating federal law?

 

[berg80]

They were supporting a fellow criminal judge?

Are you in favor of Repubs supporting an orange convicted felon?

 

[marvin martian]

We are former state and federal judges who join together to condemn the Trump Administration’s attacks on the judiciary, including its recent arrest of Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan in her courthouse. This latest action is yet another attempt to intimidate and threaten the judiciary after a series of rulings by judges appointed by presidents of both parties holding the Trump Administration accountable for its countless violations of the Constitution and laws of the United States. On April 25, you called judges “deranged” and said that “[the Administration is] sending a very strong message” and that “we will come after you and we will prosecute you.” On April 28, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt went so far as to say that the Trump Administration will not rule out arresting members of the United States Supreme Court.

The intent to intimidate Judge Dugan and the judiciary is clear from the circumstances of Judge Dugan’s arrest which took place seven days after the alleged offense. There was no emergency whatsoever; the administration could have easily issued a summons for Judge Dugan to appear before a court, as they would have done in other white collar cases. There is not an ounce of doubt that Judge Dugan would have appeared in court in response to a summons. Instead, the United States Department of Justice at your direction decided to create an embarrassing spectacle that included the FBI’s arrest and handcuffing of Judge Dugan and the Director of the FBI, Kash Patel, posting a photo of the perp walk on X. As you know well, the Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy that appears on the Justice Department’s website directs that DOJ personnel “should not voluntarily disclose a photograph of a defendant unless it serves a law enforcement function or unless the photograph is already part of the public record in the case.”

https://cfce73f5-6016-42c8-9343-fa96f8863f56.usrfiles.com/ugd/cfce73_cce5d7a9c0b84eb2b4f919b12c901e7e.pdf

Gotta give Pam and Kash some slack here. They aren't even aware of what is in the Constitution let alone the "Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy." Besides, Kash is just a little boy playing the role of FBI director cuz Don said he could. Being outsiders when it comes to the DoJ, and justice before the law, they're just trying to please the boss. Maybe sit next to him at cabinet meetings to better gaze in to the eyes of the Messiah.

LOL, reminds me of the letter from the "senior intelligence officials" where they lied about Hunter Biden's laptop on behalf of the Biden campaign.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Are you in favor of Repubs supporting an orange convicted felon?

Your Soviet LAWFARE "felonies" are GARBAGE.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Are you in favor of Repubs supporting an orange convicted felon?

.

That "orange" thing drives them out of their little minds.

MAGA




.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Are you in favor of Repubs supporting an orange convicted felon?

Yes, if he were a purple convicted felon, then we might have a problem.

 

[Concerned American]

Is there any part of the letter that says the charges against Dugan are bogus? No. Once again, since you didn't get it the first time................

It's not so much the legality of what Dugan did that's at issue in the letter. It's the way the regime conducted itself by the method of arresting her. And it's partially about the threats made against members of the judiciary made solely because the orange, bloviating cuck doesn't like having to obey the Constitution.

Cry me a river. On one hand you cry about official abuse while giving her a free pass to abuse her position because it fits your narrative. You're a hypocrite.

 

[marvin martian]

150 Democrats put their name to a letter. This reminds me of the 51 intelligence officials who sign a letter of lies about Hunter’s laptop.

Yup, and it's going to end up the same way. Those 51 liars had their security clearances revoked and are being treated like the traitors and insurrectionists they are.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Are you in favor of Repubs supporting an orange convicted felon?

Bookkeeping misdemeanors beyond the statute of limitations?
OMG! What could be worse?
DURR