Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 16,992
- 6,501
- 208
I take you've never seen Deadpool?Deflect away sheep with your little brown shirt reference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I take you've never seen Deadpool?Deflect away sheep with your little brown shirt reference.
So the answer is no.There are the facts, and the preemptive narrative...
Why?So the answer is no.
Maybe we should wait?
Because most wait for all the facts but you do you. Enjoy your story.Why?
We have The Narrative...
Truthiness is a luxury to which we cannot afford to become accustomed.Because most wait for all the facts but you do you. Enjoy your story.
She has since denied the affair ever happened.
Today there will be a new witness on behalf of Trump:
![]()
Trump cheers news of ‘most important witness’ in New York hush-money probe
Former President Trump applauded the news on Sunday that Robert Costello, who once served as a legal adviser to former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, will testify on Monday before the New York grand…thehill.com
That's obvious.Truthiness is a luxury to which we cannot afford to become accustomed.
Should be easy enough to make a liar of her...She has since denied the affair ever happened.
Today there will be a new witness on behalf of Trump:
![]()
Trump cheers news of ‘most important witness’ in New York hush-money probe
Former President Trump applauded the news on Sunday that Robert Costello, who once served as a legal adviser to former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, will testify on Monday before the New York grand…thehill.com
I don’t think Trump has denied it and it is of no major significance anyway. My assumption is he paid his damn moron lawyer.We don't even know that Trump paid him back. We've seen no evidence of any of this. All we have at this point is leaks claimed by the anti-Trump media.
It can be a hint using the passive voice. Again, my guess is that checks were cut to the lawyer by Trump. But honestly, I don’t think it matters even if Trump had paid Stormy up front. Paying for an NDA is simply not a crime.According to the leaked "information," the prosecutors evidence is that Trump gave $130,000 to his attorney and that an entry "was made" (by who?) that called it "legal fees." That careful use of passive voice is the hallmark of the dishonest.
I don’t know what Cohen’s invoice to Trump said. I’m guessing it didn’t ask for “reimbursement of NDA payment.” But again, it wouldn’t matter.$130K from a billionaire to one of his lawyers already sounds exactly like legal fees to me, so if an entry said that is what it was, where is the evidence that it was anything else?
I’m not taking anything you’ve written as argument. And it would be fine if you did. All I’m doing is guessing. I’d like to see how Cohen requested the alleged reimbursement.Not arguing with you, I know you know all that. Debating with Democrats, we often have to say, "even if A is true, that doesn't support B."
I know Stormy has flip flopped. So has Cohen. While, of course, I don’t endorse it if Trump did have sexual relations with Stormy, it still wouldn’t constitute a crime.Both Trump and Daniels have denied that they even had an affair, so the only evidence is coming from a couple of convicted and disbarred lawyers.
That has been the Democrat and Never-Trump Republican approach to all of the numerous investigations of Trump: We’ve got the perp, let’s figure out something that he did.This DA ran on ARRESTING TRUMP.
The DA had his man, he just had to manufacture a reason to arrest Trump.
No cult fucks want to discuss the statutes in question? How come?