Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We aren't talking about building 7 right now eots (though I'm on record as saying there is a degree of logic to the idea that 7 was demolished). We're talking about the two main towers that all you troofers insist came down through a controlled demolition. Here you are given an explanation of how a fairly common chemical reacton could have caused explosions and molten metal. I'm simply waiting for the latest troofer excuse to insist this was still an inside job.
We aren't talking about building 7 right now eots (though I'm on record as saying there is a degree of logic to the idea that 7 was demolished). We're talking about the two main towers that all you troofers insist came down through a controlled demolition. Here you are given an explanation of how a fairly common chemical reacton could have caused explosions and molten metal. I'm simply waiting for the latest troofer excuse to insist this was still an inside job.
How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
Do you have proof of planes NOT hitting the towers that day, because there is proof they did.How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
And I think people like you are lying when you say you are interested in the truth. What you really seem to want is evidence the government carried out the events of that day.
I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
And I think people like you are lying when you say you are interested in the truth. What you really seem to want is evidence the government carried out the events of that day.
Saying the government did it is false, as only a handful of people in positions of authority and power would be needed to carry out, or turn away from stopping the 9-11 attacks.
The OCT has been proven to be false as well as the explanations for the collapses of the buildings, now the explosions that were were denied are suddenly being acknowledged, and accounted for in yet another absurd explanation..Talk about flip flopping the story, they can't get the OCT theory right after 10 years, and you people bitch about the alternative theories being debated?
Care to elaborate, and be more specific?And I think people like you are lying when you say you are interested in the truth. What you really seem to want is evidence the government carried out the events of that day.
Saying the government did it is false, as only a handful of people in positions of authority and power would be needed to carry out, or turn away from stopping the 9-11 attacks.
The OCT has been proven to be false as well as the explanations for the collapses of the buildings, now the explosions that were were denied are suddenly being acknowledged, and accounted for in yet another absurd explanation..Talk about flip flopping the story, they can't get the OCT theory right after 10 years, and you people bitch about the alternative theories being debated?
I don't have a problem with alternative theories. I have a problem with this working backwards method of problem solving a lot of truthers seem to use. That is drawing a conclusion then finding evidence for it. As opposed to the other way around as it should be done.
so even more people dispute the NIST investigation and findings
And I think people like you are lying when you say you are interested in the truth. What you really seem to want is evidence the government carried out the events of that day.
Saying the government did it is false, as only a handful of people in positions of authority and power would be needed to carry out, or turn away from stopping the 9-11 attacks.
The OCT has been proven to be false as well as the explanations for the collapses of the buildings, now the explosions that were were denied are suddenly being acknowledged, and accounted for in yet another absurd explanation..Talk about flip flopping the story, they can't get the OCT theory right after 10 years, and you people bitch about the alternative theories being debated?
I don't have a problem with alternative theories. I have a problem with this working backwards method of problem solving a lot of truthers seem to use. That is drawing a conclusion then finding evidence for it. As opposed to the other way around as it should be done.
BUMP!
And how does your "type" find the truth? When someone comes up with a new theory as to why the WTC collapsed your answer is to trash the NIST report yet again? Your debating skills are almost down to the level of Rimjob, who you seem to support.How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
And how does your "type" find the truth? When someone comes up with a new theory as to why the WTC collapsed your answer is to trash the NIST report yet again? Your debating skills are almost down to the level of Rimjob, who you seem to support.How can this be, when a plane didn't even crash into the towers that day?
In fact, I'm beginning to think it never really happened. All this 10th anniversary stuff is just a government ploy to make you think it happened.
I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
BUMP!
Odd after a decade of whining about a new investigation the twoofers bitch when a new investigation is made!
I've always wondered why they did not under take building their own computer models, was it too complicated?
shouldn't have been ,they claim to have many qualified scientists, engineers etc..
as much time as they spend posting you tubes videos and expounding on pseudo scientific "theories" and specious speculation..maybe the last 10 years should have been used to do ACTUAL TESTS AND REAL RESEARCH, instead of hocking T-shirts and coffee mugs ,selling cheaply made NON INFO informational DVDs.
the most laughable thing of all is you people bought and paid for Alex Jones' house,car and girlfriends and gave him a career.:LOL::LOL::LOL:
Yet we make no progress with you. I have stated that I had problems with the NIST take on WTC7. But, considering the unique construction of WTC 1&2, I have no problem with the theory of why the twin towers crashed.And how does your "type" find the truth? When someone comes up with a new theory as to why the WTC collapsed your answer is to trash the NIST report yet again? Your debating skills are almost down to the level of Rimjob, who you seem to support.I think people like you are an irrelevant distraction from finding any truth
so you admit that the NIST findings where a ...theory then... that's progress