Lessons Not To Be Ignored

[PoliticalChic]

Speaking of 'lessons,' it is a supreme advantage to the Left that so many victims of government schooling weren't even born when the Berlin Wall fell, and Ronaldus Maximus slapped down the Evil Empire.

But now...the 20th century is making a re-appearance in the Ukraine.

Compare what the Left has told you to believe about America with what is occurring before your very eyes.



1.People come to this country from all over the world because they know things, as in we all live together withing the most amazing experiment in human history, the idea of self-governance. The idea was new and dramatic during a time when most lived under monarchs and rulers who had subjects, serfs, and slaves.

The United States, was a work in progress, where the idea was aspirational, and became operational, that your origins didn’t matter, nor your skin color or religion, or your gender- although the Democrats kept women from the vote until Republicans prevailed, the very same pattern that pertained to race.

Here, you could be a ‘citizen,’ with unalienable rights given by God, where you can rise based on your own efforts and your merits.



2. The project was to have as much freedom as you could possibly have with as little government as necessary. Enjoy the fruits of one’s labor. Voila- the freest and fairest country in the history of the world.

Examples of what happens when the Left is in charge are copious: Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Putin….and those who support and associate with these, that would be the Democrats.

Russia invading Ukraine….that’s the Left

China enforcing slavery….that’s the Left

Cuba, an island prison camp….that’s the Left.

And the Democrat Party, joined in the ideology of all of them......that's the Left.





3. A very simple test of which ideology, the American traditions versus the Democrat socialism, consider the Gates Test. When the gates are opened, do people rush in or rush out?

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, instead of having so much freedom and prosperity that they need to build walls to keep the rest of the world from rushing in. If you leave a socialist nation, they call it an ‘escape,’ like Cuba, East Germany, where they shoot you in the back for trying to escape from their ‘Worker’s Paradise.’


That’s the Utopia that the Left says they’re building….using an interesting methodology that began with the French Revolution, and was used in every Leftist administration....you should recognize it in the Cancel Culture.
"Terror is an instrument of social hygiene" Lenin

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

The head of the beast must literally be cut off, in order for this country to survive.........
But the beast is a multi-headed monstrosity that must be slain in its entirety for us to survive.

 

[BULLDOG]

Speaking of 'lessons,' it is a supreme advantage to the Left that so many victims of government schooling weren't even born when the Berlin Wall fell, and Ronaldus Maximus slapped down the Evil Empire.

But now...the 20th century is making a re-appearance in the Ukraine.

Compare what the Left has told you to believe about America with what is occurring before your very eyes.



1.People come to this country from all over the world because they know things, as in we all live together withing the most amazing experiment in human history, the idea of self-governance. The idea was new and dramatic during a time when most lived under monarchs and rulers who had subjects, serfs, and slaves.

The United States, was a work in progress, where the idea was aspirational, and became operational, that your origins didn’t matter, nor your skin color or religion, or your gender- although the Democrats kept women from the vote until Republicans prevailed, the very same pattern that pertained to race.

Here, you could be a ‘citizen,’ with unalienable rights given by God, where you can rise based on your own efforts and your merits.



2. The project was to have as much freedom as you could possibly have with as little government as necessary. Enjoy the fruits of one’s labor. Voila- the freest and fairest country in the history of the world.

Examples of what happens when the Left is in charge are copious: Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Putin….and those who support and associate with these, that would be the Democrats.

Russia invading Ukraine….that’s the Left

China enforcing slavery….that’s the Left

Cuba, an island prison camp….that’s the Left.

And the Democrat Party, joined in the ideology of all of them......that's the Left.





3. A very simple test of which ideology, the American traditions versus the Democrat socialism, consider the Gates Test. When the gates are opened, do people rush in or rush out?

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, instead of having so much freedom and prosperity that they need to build walls to keep the rest of the world from rushing in. If you leave a socialist nation, they call it an ‘escape,’ like Cuba, East Germany, where they shoot you in the back for trying to escape from their ‘Worker’s Paradise.’


That’s the Utopia that the Left says they’re building….using an interesting methodology that began with the French Revolution, and was used in every Leftist administration....you should recognize it in the Cancel Culture.
"Terror is an instrument of social hygiene" Lenin

Your remark presents the perfect time to ask for clerification of many of your previous remarks. Is America truly a work in progress, as you claim above, or bound to only the goals and rules put forward at our founding? A work in progress requires a living document to meet the unforseen challenges. Do you agree?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your remark presents the perfect time to ask for clerification of many of your previous remarks. Is America truly a work in progress, as you claim above, or bound to only the goals and rules put forward at our founding? A work in progress requires a living document to meet the unforseen challenges. Do you agree?

The progress was from the need to put the 3/5 of a man in to get ratification, to the freedom amendments won through warfare against the Democrats.


Later, Republicans defeated Democrat filibusters and won the vote for women.


Now....every Democrat must be removed from office so we do not go back to racism:
The 'Skin-Color Party'????





Let's check:

























============================================




"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."







“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info

What's wrong with racism?




Did you vote to enforce racism????

 

[PoliticalChic]

The head of the beast must literally be cut off, in order for this country to survive.........
But the beast is a multi-headed monstrosity that must be slain in its entirety for us to survive.

View attachment 608625View attachment 608626View attachment 608627
View attachment 608628View attachment 608629View attachment 608630View attachment 608633

Every Democrat must be voted out of office......and.....


Unless we can pry the schools from them, as earlier American pried their slaves from them.....America is lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your remark presents the perfect time to ask for clerification of many of your previous remarks. Is America truly a work in progress, as you claim above, or bound to only the goals and rules put forward at our founding? A work in progress requires a living document to meet the unforseen challenges. Do you agree?

"A work in progress requires a living document to meet the unforseen challenges. Do you agree?"

The Constituion has the method: the amendment process.

It has been used successfully 27 times.



There are those who hate America.......Justice Wm. Brennan, jr…1985 Georgetown speech supported the “transformative purpose” of the Constitution, in which he argued for an “aspiration to social justice, brotherhood, and human dignity…”

1. He claimed that General Meese’s vision was “little more than arrogance cloaked in humility” because we cannot discern how the Framers would apply moral-philosophic natural law to modern problems. Brennan denies any “static meaning,” but looks, instead, for ‘adaptability.”
2. To say that the genius of a constitution lies in the fluidity of its meaning is a little bit like saying that the genius of the brakes on your car is the way they can be used for acceleration. The whole point of having a constitution or a bill of rights is to memorialize and entrench fundamental rights so they can prevail in moments of passion.
3. The errors in Justice Brennan’s speech include the following:
   1. The idea of ‘adaptability’ is an affront to our idea of inter-generational lawmaking. Why start a business if one could not be certain that the Takings Clause would not remain in effect? Can we imagine an America without freedom of the press, or of speech, or the protections for private property? No…each generation remains bound by the rights its predecessor entrenched, as opposed to a doctrine in which each generation could bring its own meaning to the Constitution. San Diego Law School Professor Steven D. Smith points out that legal texts are simply scrawls if separated from the meaning given them by the Framers who wrote them.
   2. Brennan falls back on the idea that moderns should not be bound by “a world that is dead and gone.” Of course, there are lots of laws on the books today by folks dead and gone: Social Security laws, or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Sixteenth Amendment imposing an income tax, and all nine justices who participated in Roe v. Wade are now dead. Would Brennan suggest ignoring any of these….or does he simply wish to allow judges to pick and choose which laws written by dead people we are to be bound by? No, this ‘transformative’ view would simply allow justices to erase parts of the Constitution.
   3. While Justice Brennan advances the view that Originalists’ presumption is was “little more than arrogance cloaked in humility,” one should consider which view is truly arrogant: Brennan’s view is that those of us in the present generation are better able to judge than our benighted ancestors. Really? The American Constitution has survived for two centuries, the oldest and first such document in existence, and has inspired countless copies around the world. Through it we remain the freest and most fortunate people on earth.
   4. Finally, the ‘transformative’ view raises the level of generality of the Constitution in order to justify the left-wing outcomes that progressives want. Brennan identifies the Bill of Rights as protecting human dignity, then asks whether the death penalty, for example, is compatible with human dignity. A perfect example of sophistry, and lawyerly sleight of hand. The text of the Constitution does not speak vaguely of human dignity…but does specifically of freedom of speech, and of the press, about unreasonable searches and seizures, and about property not being taken capriciously. So, Brennan twists the ideas to produce what he deems good consequences. By that endeavor “the rule of law and not of men” becomes impossible.

Worth reading:

 

[BULLDOG]

The progress was from the need to put the 3/5 of a man in to get ratification, to the freedom amendments won through warfare against the Democrats.


Later, Republicans defeated Democrat filibusters and won the vote for women.


Now....every Democrat must be removed from office so we do not go back to racism:
The 'Skin-Color Party'????





Let's check:

























============================================




"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.

“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."







“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info

What's wrong with racism?




Did you vote to enforce racism????

So you claim that giving women the right to vote, and considering black people to be a full person, instead of only 3/5 was the completion of all necessary progress? That the U.S. is now perfect, and there is no longer any need for any changes? If that isn't your belief, what changes would YOU make in our constitution, and our way of life?

 

[BWK]

Speaking of 'lessons,' it is a supreme advantage to the Left that so many victims of government schooling weren't even born when the Berlin Wall fell, and Ronaldus Maximus slapped down the Evil Empire.

But now...the 20th century is making a re-appearance in the Ukraine.

Compare what the Left has told you to believe about America with what is occurring before your very eyes.



1.People come to this country from all over the world because they know things, as in we all live together withing the most amazing experiment in human history, the idea of self-governance. The idea was new and dramatic during a time when most lived under monarchs and rulers who had subjects, serfs, and slaves.

The United States, was a work in progress, where the idea was aspirational, and became operational, that your origins didn’t matter, nor your skin color or religion, or your gender- although the Democrats kept women from the vote until Republicans prevailed, the very same pattern that pertained to race.

Here, you could be a ‘citizen,’ with unalienable rights given by God, where you can rise based on your own efforts and your merits.



2. The project was to have as much freedom as you could possibly have with as little government as necessary. Enjoy the fruits of one’s labor. Voila- the freest and fairest country in the history of the world.

Examples of what happens when the Left is in charge are copious: Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Putin….and those who support and associate with these, that would be the Democrats.

Russia invading Ukraine….that’s the Left

China enforcing slavery….that’s the Left

Cuba, an island prison camp….that’s the Left.

And the Democrat Party, joined in the ideology of all of them......that's the Left.





3. A very simple test of which ideology, the American traditions versus the Democrat socialism, consider the Gates Test. When the gates are opened, do people rush in or rush out?

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, instead of having so much freedom and prosperity that they need to build walls to keep the rest of the world from rushing in. If you leave a socialist nation, they call it an ‘escape,’ like Cuba, East Germany, where they shoot you in the back for trying to escape from their ‘Worker’s Paradise.’


That’s the Utopia that the Left says they’re building….using an interesting methodology that began with the French Revolution, and was used in every Leftist administration....you should recognize it in the Cancel Culture.
"Terror is an instrument of social hygiene" Lenin

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, Socialist regimes build walls? And Trump's wall?


3. A very simple test of which ideology, the American traditions versus the Democrat socialism, consider the Gates Test. When the gates are opened, do people rush in or rush out?

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, instead of having so much freedom and prosperity that they need to build walls to keep the rest of the world from rushing in. If you leave a socialist nation, they call it an ‘escape,’ like Cuba, East Germany, where they shoot you in the back for trying to escape from their ‘Worker’s Paradise.’


That’s the Utopia that the Left says they’re building….using an interesting methodology that began with the French Revolution, and was used in every Leftist administration....you should recognize it in the Cancel Culture. Let's discuss this nonsense shall we. The first thing we need to establish is, these are all lies. How do we know? The OP cannot back up her Democrat Socialism claims for one, with any documented evidence. And next, the rest of the world such as Latin America are rushing in as refugees from the eighty years of U.S. imperialism, which the OP is hog tied to argue over; Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.com

Folks, stay on top of their lies, ignorance, and 24/7 misinformation. It's the only way to save this country.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So you claim that giving women the right to vote, and considering black people to be a full person, instead of only 3/5 was the completion of all necessary progress? That the U.S. is now perfect, and there is no longer any need for any changes? If that isn't your belief, what changes would YOU make in our constitution, and our way of life?

I never used the term 'perfect.'

I reserve that for.......moi.

 

[BULLDOG]

The right wing packed court would suggest you, and like minded trump supporters would be just fine with eliminating Roe V Wade. Trump's appointees were chosen with the elimination of that right as a requirement for consideration. It seems that the reality of what you advocate is different from your claim. So far, you have clerified nothing. Do you consider our way of life, and our interpretation of the constiturion to be perfect or not? What changes would YOU make, if any?

 

[BULLDOG]

I never used the term 'perfect.'

I reserve that for.......moi.

But you did imply that any changes were somehow unAmerican, and unreasonable to consider.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, Socialist regimes build walls? And Trump's wall?


3. A very simple test of which ideology, the American traditions versus the Democrat socialism, consider the Gates Test. When the gates are opened, do people rush in or rush out?

Under socialist regimes, they build walls to keep people in, instead of having so much freedom and prosperity that they need to build walls to keep the rest of the world from rushing in. If you leave a socialist nation, they call it an ‘escape,’ like Cuba, East Germany, where they shoot you in the back for trying to escape from their ‘Worker’s Paradise.’


That’s the Utopia that the Left says they’re building….using an interesting methodology that began with the French Revolution, and was used in every Leftist administration....you should recognize it in the Cancel Culture. Let's discuss this nonsense shall we. The first thing we need to establish is, these are all lies. How do we know? The OP cannot back up her Democrat Socialism claims for one, with any documented evidence. And next, the rest of the world such as Latin America are rushing in as refugees from the eighty years of U.S. imperialism, which the OP is hog tied to argue over; Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.com

Folks, stay on top of their lies, ignorance, and 24/7 misinformation. It's the only way to save this country.

"And Trump's wall?"


Democrats are never able to answer this question: can you name three or four of the books that have informed your geopolitical outlook.....

Here's why:
Liber"als don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter.


Your post reveals the urgent need to invest in books, like this one:

---

​

Well known that the media is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Left....but overlooked is the commensurate control of the language.

So....rather than the headline "Obama Assaults American Sovereignty" we are feted to a far softer "Alien Children Cross The Border."

Let's examine what is actually going on.




1. " ...those 300 U.S. military advisers that the Obama administration has ordered to Iraq. They belong on the United States border with Mexico. They are urgently needed ... from what is surely the most unconventional and, I believe, the most dangerous war in our history. As tens of thousands of so-called unaccompanied alien children (UAC) crash our southern border, we are undergoing a war against the existence, the concept of the USA as a nation-state.

2. ...a nation-state doesn't exist unless it controls its borders and protects its citizens. We, the People, do neither. But the existential danger here comes not from the assault itself. ... it comes from the Obama administration, which, in its greatest betrayal, is leading, or at least supporting, the aliens' charge.




3. A normal government -- one with the best interests of its own citizens at heart -- would have taken immediate steps to 1) halt these border crossings that pose a dire threat to public health and safety, and 2) set in motion the deportation efforts necessary to return these illegal aliens to their home countries.



Hence.....Trump's wall.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The right wing packed court would suggest you, and like minded trump supporters would be just fine with eliminating Roe V Wade. Trump's appointees were chosen with the elimination of that right as a requirement for consideration. It seems that the reality of what you advocate is different from your claim. So far, you have clerified nothing. Do you consider our way of life, and our interpretation of the constiturion to be perfect or not? What changes would YOU make, if any?

No court has been 'packed' since Democrat FDR tried it.

Nearly every expert and rational person knows that Roe was poorly decided.

There is no such 'right' in the Constitution.

 

[BULLDOG]

Interesting that you only list books wrtten by proponents of extreme nutbagism. You ever read anything written by a sane author?

 

[PoliticalChic]

But you did imply that any changes were somehow unAmerican, and unreasonable to consider.

I bet you can't find any such quote of mine.....that would mean you are a liar.



Let's review terms. 'a' is American, b represents your 'values.'


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
“free markets, free voices, free people”

,
Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Interesting that you only list books wrtten by proponents of extreme nutbagism. You ever read anything written by a sane author?

I have read a number of books by the opposition, some of which I found unreadable.


Well....since you ask....but be advised: it's gonna really make you feel badly.

You see, it's not just what I learned in school.

Stopping learning at that point is probably what led to your problem.


I am usually reading between 5-6 books (slacking off....only four at this time).

And that includes those by Leftists, too....From Why Were Liberals, by Eric Alterman, to Glenn Greenwald, With Liberty and Justice for Some; How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful to Amy Goodman....Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality by Richard Thompson Ford.
I found Red, White & Liberal: How Left Is Right & Right Is Wrong by Alan Colmes totally unreadable....
You'd probably like it.


And this is what I learned in school: everything I read, I take notes on.




Just like you, huh?

 

[BULLDOG]

No court has been 'packed' since Democrat FDR tried it.

Nearly every expert and rational person knows that Roe was poorly decided.

There is no such 'right' in the Constitution.

Yet the SC found that the right was supported by the constitution. The court was packed to reverse that decision. Trump even admitted it was a requirement for consideration of his nomination.

 

[BULLDOG]

I bet you can't find any such quote of mine.....that would mean you are a liar.



Let's review terms. 'a' is American, b represents your 'values.'


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
“free markets, free voices, free people”

,
Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

I'm not going through your rheems of cut an paste posts, but anyone who has read even a small number of your treakle knows your stance on the issue. Seems odd that you only object to my claim after failing to effectively dodge my question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yet the SC found that the right was supported by the constitution. The court was packed to reverse that decision. Trump even admitted it was a requirement for consideration of his nomination.

I don't know what you are babbling about.