Legal expert: President is NOT required to release his taxes!

[nat4900]

So you have conceded the point that Trump by law is not required to release his financial or tax records! Got it.

MORON....it is NOT up to Trump ........What an idiot...........

(Yet another example why Trump said that he "LOVES the poorly educated").............LMAO

 

[iceberg]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Trump Wrong About Tax Law - FactCheck.org

From the Link:

Asked whether he believes federal law requires him to give Congress his tax returns, President Donald Trump responded, “There’s no law whatsoever.” He’s wrong about that.

There is, in fact, a federal tax law that specifically states if the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee makes a written request for an individual’s tax returns — as Rep. Richard Neal has done seeking Trump’s — the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” those returns. The law says those returns would be reviewed confidentially in an executive session.

Once again, lies, lies and more lies spewed from the mouth of donald trump.

Cite the law

 

[nat4900]

Let us all know when you see his taxes, dickbreath

MORON..........Its NOT up to me or idiots like you to "see his tax returns".....Its up to an army of TAX LAWYERS and TAX ACCOUNTANTS to filter out ALL of the ethical challenges that the orange clown has conned the system.

HAPPY DAYS AHEAD.......lol

 

[Edgetho]

So you have conceded the point that Trump by law is not required to release his financial or tax records! Got it.

MORON....it is NOT up to Trump ........What an idiot...........

(Yet another example why Trump said that he "LOVES the poorly educated").............LMAO

Once again, let us all know when that happens.

Meanwhile, can't you find something better to do than obsess over how much you hate The President of The United States?

It's getting to the point where some might think you're dangerous.

Now go clean your room before mommy gets home

 

[nat4900]

[QUOTE="Oddball, post: 22197183, member: 17281"]It means that "must" and "shall" become the permissive "may", when construing the imperative violates your rights, which includes all of the BoR.... But good luck with your case, Francis.[/QUOTE]


Careful there, Trump ass licker.........LMAO

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[Wry Catcher]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Trump Wrong About Tax Law - FactCheck.org

From the Link:

Asked whether he believes federal law requires him to give Congress his tax returns, President Donald Trump responded, “There’s no law whatsoever.” He’s wrong about that.

There is, in fact, a federal tax law that specifically states if the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee makes a written request for an individual’s tax returns — as Rep. Richard Neal has done seeking Trump’s — the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” those returns. The law says those returns would be reviewed confidentially in an executive session.

Once again, lies, lies and more lies spewed from the mouth of donald trump.

Cite the law

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Trump Wrong About Tax Law - FactCheck.org

From the Link:

Asked whether he believes federal law requires him to give Congress his tax returns, President Donald Trump responded, “There’s no law whatsoever.” He’s wrong about that.

There is, in fact, a federal tax law that specifically states if the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee makes a written request for an individual’s tax returns — as Rep. Richard Neal has done seeking Trump’s — the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” those returns. The law says those returns would be reviewed confidentially in an executive session.

Once again, lies, lies and more lies spewed from the mouth of donald trump.

Cite the law

See: 26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

Sec: (F) Disclosure to Committees of Congress

 

[Cellblock2429]

The refusal to release his tax returns, if nothing else, is proof Trump never wanted to be president.

/----/ What kind of twisted logic is that?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump CULT members.....like the above two idiots......don't want to get through their half brains that it is NOT up to Trump to determine whether he is "required" to release his tax returns......

THE LAW IS EXPLICIT and CLEAR..........Congress requests from the IRS...and the IRS MUST comply with the request....That is the law...and the ONLY "recourse" that the Trump criminal enterprise can exert, is to STALL the inevitable.

LIVE WITH IT !!!!

Poor little moonbat gnat never got the memo that USSC has ruled the words "must" and "shall" to be false imperatives....IOW, they mean the permissive "may" if the direction in question violates one's rights.

While I realize that you're too much of a brick head to learn something new, I'll post these for those who do have intellectual curiosity.

With the understanding that the Supreme Court ruled that…

http://www.ncsl.org/legislators-sta...volume-xxvi-issue-2-the-false-imperative.aspx

What's the only word that means mandatory? Here's what law and policy say about "shall, will, may and must."

Here's the problem

1. This law was written in the 1920's, NOT the recent modern era of which your articles speak about, and the teaching of the issue at hand today.

Shall in early times, was NEVER used as a replacement for 'may', it meant MUST.... if you can find one itty bitty statute written in the 1920's that used the word MUST in Law, then you might or 'may' have a point....

SHALL meant MUST, in every instance from what I had read up on it.

These newly written articles about how it should be written in 'today's' times, base on a SC ruling a statue written in fairly modern times for a civil law case, means nothing when it comes to how and what the term "shall" meant, at the time the law was written, and justices would acknowledge that....

2. If what you are saying is true, that "shall" means "may" or could be argued to mean "may",

then some litigant can come in today and argue in court, that our 1st Thru 9th amendments of the 10 in our Bill of Rights in the Constitution, where the word "shall" is used, means "may" and NOT "must",

this would completely annihilate our Bill of Rights,

blow them in to SMITHEREENS.


============

So, before going with this theory you have bought in to,
I'd give it a second thought, Oddball.

The "problem" is that the law violates the 4th Amendment.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[bripat9643]

Constitution of United States of America
Amendment 4
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Didn't work too well for either Nixon OR all those involved in the TeaPot Dome scandal......But, nice try......lol

Trump hasn't committed any crimes, douchebag.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[WillowTree]

So you have conceded the point that Trump by law is not required to release his financial or tax records! Got it.

MORON....it is NOT up to Trump ........What an idiot...........

(Yet another example why Trump said that he "LOVES the poorly educated").............LMAO

So ewe think Trump Wooten the law? Idiot!

 

[bripat9643]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

lol

No one said he does.

And no one says this is a legal issue, it’s a political issue.

As a political issue, it illustrates Trump’s arrogance, his contempt for government transparency, and the fact Trump is unfit to be president.

It's s legal and constitutional issue, moron. If anyone is demonstrating their arrogance, it's the Dims in the House.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Kondor3]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Now, all you need to do is get the US Circuit Courts, Appellate Courts, and Supreme Court to agree, and your boy is all set.

 

[bripat9643]

Let us all know when you see his taxes, dickbreath

MORON..........Its NOT up to me or idiots like you to "see his tax returns".....Its up to an army of TAX LAWYERS and TAX ACCOUNTANTS to filter out ALL of the ethical challenges that the orange clown has conned the system.

HAPPY DAYS AHEAD.......lol

That's never going to happen, moron.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[bripat9643]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Trump Wrong About Tax Law - FactCheck.org

From the Link:

Asked whether he believes federal law requires him to give Congress his tax returns, President Donald Trump responded, “There’s no law whatsoever.” He’s wrong about that.

There is, in fact, a federal tax law that specifically states if the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee makes a written request for an individual’s tax returns — as Rep. Richard Neal has done seeking Trump’s — the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” those returns. The law says those returns would be reviewed confidentially in an executive session.

Once again, lies, lies and more lies spewed from the mouth of donald trump.

Cite the law

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Trump Wrong About Tax Law - FactCheck.org

From the Link:

Asked whether he believes federal law requires him to give Congress his tax returns, President Donald Trump responded, “There’s no law whatsoever.” He’s wrong about that.

There is, in fact, a federal tax law that specifically states if the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee makes a written request for an individual’s tax returns — as Rep. Richard Neal has done seeking Trump’s — the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” those returns. The law says those returns would be reviewed confidentially in an executive session.

Once again, lies, lies and more lies spewed from the mouth of donald trump.

Cite the law

See: 26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

Sec: (F) Disclosure to Committees of Congress

See the 4th Amendment.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Edgetho]

Let us all know when you see his taxes, dickbreath

MORON..........Its NOT up to me or idiots like you to "see his tax returns".....Its up to an army of TAX LAWYERS and TAX ACCOUNTANTS to filter out ALL of the ethical challenges that the orange clown has conned the system.

HAPPY DAYS AHEAD.......lol

NO it isn't you ******* moron.

When the two elected branches of our government conflict, as in this case, one of them often turns to the Courts to decide the outcome.

Even if one of the Appeals Courts wants the humiliation of being overturned and chided by SCOTUS, it will take YEARS for it to reach SCOTUS.

You're just a stupid little ***** of a yappy dog that somebody needs to ***** slap. Seriously.

Go away, little *****

 

[occupied]

The refusal to release his tax returns, if nothing else, is proof Trump never wanted to be president.

/----/ What kind of twisted logic is that?
View attachment 255845

Trump's entire campaign was a publicity stunt meant to launch a TV network. He had no list of nominees ready to go, no immediate plans and no idea how to actually be president. He had a Moscow deal in the works that had to be abandoned and no wish to actually disclose anything about his finances. He still acts like he thinks he is a private individual.

 

[Weatherman2020]

University of Iowa Law Prof. Andy Grewal, however, questions the legitimacy of the letter(Democrats' request).

“As the letter hints, Congress has broad powers and they’re acting for proper purposes and usually the mental thoughts of the legislature don’t negate the validity of the inquiry, but the question here is, are they in fact pursing a legitimate purpose?” he said in an interview with Law&Crime.

“Generally, there are strong presumptions of Congress’ investigations, but that doesn’t mean it’s conclusive if they just say they need information,” he continued.

Earlier this month, Neal formally requested the last six years’ worth of President Trump‘s tax returns, citing what’s been dubbed a “little-known provision” in tax code to do so.





Tax Expert: ‘Far From Clear’ That IRS Can Be Compelled to Release Trump’s Returns

Since when does the Left care about laws?

 

[Edgetho]

Trump's entire campaign was a publicity stunt meant to launch a TV network. He had no list of nominees ready to go, no immediate plans and no idea how to actually be president. He had a Moscow deal in the works that had to be abandoned and no wish to actually disclose anything about his finances. He still acts like he thinks he is a private individual.

Wow!

And he beat that nasty, diseased scrunt you voted for!?!?!?!!

What's that tell you........

imbecile

 

[Aponi]

Trump CULT members.....like the above two idiots......don't want to get through their half brains that it is NOT up to Trump to determine whether he is "required" to release his tax returns......

THE LAW IS EXPLICIT and CLEAR..........Congress requests from the IRS...and the IRS MUST comply with the request....That is the law...and the ONLY "recourse" that the Trump criminal enterprise can exert, is to STALL the inevitable.

LIVE WITH IT !!!!

O look its the human moron.
As sanders said most of congress dont do their own taxes and probally wouldnt understand the thousands of pages of trumps tax returns .
Your lucky to comprehend the funny papers so a multi billionares returns woukd make your head pop like the aliens in mars attacks

 

[occupied]

Trump's entire campaign was a publicity stunt meant to launch a TV network. He had no list of nominees ready to go, no immediate plans and no idea how to actually be president. He had a Moscow deal in the works that had to be abandoned and no wish to actually disclose anything about his finances. He still acts like he thinks he is a private individual.

Wow!

And he beat that nasty, diseased scrunt you voted for!?!?!?!!

What's that tell you........

imbecile

Your Fuhrer would be proud of your childish name calling. You're an unfunny joke told over and over again.