RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
- 290
It was my post, asswipe.The poster I responded to was talking about people going "elsewhere" from PP. Can you read ?Who the fuck pays when medicare & medicaid patients go to Planned Parenthood. You assfucks get dumber with every ridiculous post you make,.Only a nut job liberal would say that the govt would have to pay for these services.Yet another ignorant Trumpette.You are the ass. I have no desire whatsoever to allow untrained people to carry guns anywhere. Of course that would be ridiculous, and I've never heard of anybody endorsing such a foolish idea.Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.
"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows
When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?
View attachment 320242
And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.
So they had an armed guard.FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.Parkland had armed guards assfuck.
You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>
Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).
I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?
I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.
How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.
How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.
Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.
You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.
It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.
It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.
I've also never heard of any place where people can carry guns just from paying a fee. Sounds nuts.
You sure you're not just making this up ? With such an outlandish claim, you should be posting a source link to support it. I notice you're not doing that
"Let’s say we want the bare minimum, just enough to pass the safety requirement for gun ownership. In Maryland, there’s a company that will charge you $100 for that training. The cost, then, would be about $71.8 million for all of our teachers.
.....more robust training means that the cost for our 718,000 teachers spikes to $718 million. There would almost certainly be some efficiencies of scale that would come into play here — systems would be developed to train teachers quickly and at less cost — but the figure would still likely run into the hundreds of millions of dollars."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ming-americas-schools/?utm_term=.296687096db3
WHAT?????
That's it????????
Here's a place to start:
"...the nearly $450 million spent annually on National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Network and a number of small regional public radio and TV networks would disappear."
Trump Budget Has Public Broadcasting in a Fight for its Life
Here's another 'donation'...
"...Planned Parenthood receives approximately $500 million a year in taxpayer funds, as a GAO report indicated last year."
How Much of Your Tax Money Does Planned Parenthood Get? A New Report Will Tell You | LifeNews.com
What the heck are we waiting for???????
Planned Parenthood gets reimbursements for services rendered. Cut off PP & those people would have to go elsewhere for those services & the government would still pay for them.