Leftist Policy And The Parkland Killings

[daveman]

The book rates number one on Amazon in these categories..

• #1 in School Safety
• #1 in Political Commentary & Opinion
• #1 in Education Administration

....is the one that reveals the role that Obama's Leftist policy played in the slaughter of 17 innocents at the Parkland High School.

1. All the talk about 'background checks' is for naught because Leftist policy made certain that the mass killer at Parkland was spared any blight on his record that would have red-flagged his background, and made him ineligible to purchase the gun.



2. Liberals, the Democrat Obama administration, imposed regulations on schools that forbid police being called when felonious students run amuck.

As a result of the school's acquiescence to the Democrat/ Liberal protocol, Nikolas Cruz had no police record, and was able to pass a background check and purchase the gun that killed 17 innocents.
One more tragedy at the intersection of Liberalism and education.



3. The Obama regulation that schools were forced to abide by, and that police departments were bribed into accepting, allowed the Florida shooter to buy his weapons.

“One of the people impacted by this new policy was the murderer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Because of the new reporting (or non-reporting) system, the murderer had 21 incidents at the school that were not referred to the police. The police then were called to his home 39 times. Not once was this person taken to the police station and charged with anything and kept overnight. If just once he had been, he would not have passed his background check and he would never have been able to acquire a legal weapon of any kind.



4. Every time people speak of issues like gun control, they will point to “if we can just save one life.” Here 17 lives were lost because of a failed social policy that has spread throughout the country.

This weekend, students from Parkland fanned out across the country to preach gun control and speak at gun control rallies. Their ignorance of the policies that were put in place by social engineering bureaucrats that directly led to this massacre hovers over them as they preach of false gods.”
How Social Engineering Led to the Parkland Massacre=



5. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received at least 45 calls related to Cruz and his brother dating back to 2008 – including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.

Their inaction reflects the Broward department’s embrace of the school district’s approach to student crime. Even in response to a major crime scene, Sheriff Israel agreed to defer to school officials when “feasible” and employ “the least punitive means of discipline” against the perpetrators. https://www.realclearinvestigations...cipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html



Every time you hear some screed from the Left/Democrats about the evil of the Right, remember Parkland, and know that they are simply lying about something that they are responsible for.

There was an armed guard at the school. He was afraid to go in. I bet he was a Republican.

Remember when the nuts told us if there was just one hero with a gun? Now it needs to be a damn army. Hell with kids lives, sell guns.

Remember when irrational gun-phobics told us criminals would obey gun laws?

Now they tell us there needs to be even more laws.

We have some of the weakest in the world. But crime did go down drastically the last time we added some.

No, it didn't.

 

[daveman]

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Except that study is false.

Your link is to a gun lobby propaganda site. Of course they claim it's false.

Your "study" is by an anti-gun economist who used flawed methodology. Of course you believe it without question.

 

[daveman]

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)

VPC: Concealed Carry Killers

Really? They count suicide as "non-self-defense".

This trash is dismissed.

So having a gun has nothing to do with suicide by gun. I get it.

No, you don't, actually. In the United States, only in Maryland is suicide a crime.

In the other 49 states, it's not. So suicide by gun can't be counted in gun crime statistics.

That's called "logic". I know you don't recognize it.

Counted in gun deaths,.

Yes, because people intent on killing themselves NEVER use any other method than guns. If guns were banned, no one would kill themselves!

 

[daveman]

There was an armed guard at the school. He was afraid to go in. I bet he was a Republican.

Remember when the nuts told us if there was just one hero with a gun? Now it needs to be a damn army. Hell with kids lives, sell guns.

Remember when irrational gun-phobics told us criminals would obey gun laws?

Now they tell us there needs to be even more laws.

A person with an illegal gun can be arrested before he uses it.

You assfucks want to arm them with AR-15s with 100 round magazines that they can lergally carry right up to the point they open fire.

How stupid are you people?

Not stupid enough to believe that criminals will obey the law, dumbass.

Wow, so you were too fucking stupid to comprehend my post.

DUI laws don't stop drunk drivers but if you are caught driving drunk, you get arrested.

Just like DUI laws do stop people from driving drunk, gun laws would stop some people from carrying guns.

You want to hand out guns to every one & think this actually helps something.

You don't know what I want. You didn't ask. You rely solely on whatever other leftists tell you -- and they lie. A lot.

I don't want to hand out guns to anyone. I want anyone with no legal bar to gun ownership to be able to purchase weapons if they want to, as is their Second Amendment right.

You seem to think -- sorry, wrong word -- feel that taking away the rights of law-abiding people will have an effect on people who don't obey the law.

No one has ever been able to rationally explain that bit of lunacy. I doubt you'll be able to.

 

[daveman]

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html
   3. http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

How many mass killers were one of you law abiding gun toters right up until they slaughtered children.

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Another dishonest argument from another dishonest gun nut.

We talk about closing loopholes. Are you saying that honest gun owners need to buy guns on the sly? If they were honest, why do they need loopholes?

We talk about assault type rifles which have ZERO to do with conceal carry permits.

What is an assault rifle?

 

[BlindBoo]

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html
   3. http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

How many mass killers were one of you law abiding gun toters right up until they slaughtered children.

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Another dishonest argument from another dishonest gun nut.

We talk about closing loopholes. Are you saying that honest gun owners need to buy guns on the sly? If they were honest, why do they need loopholes?

We talk about assault type rifles which have ZERO to do with conceal carry permits.

What is an assault rifle?

A rifle that you can attach a bayonet to.

Bonzi Assault rifle.

 

[daveman]

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html
   3. http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

How many mass killers were one of you law abiding gun toters right up until they slaughtered children.

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Another dishonest argument from another dishonest gun nut.

We talk about closing loopholes. Are you saying that honest gun owners need to buy guns on the sly? If they were honest, why do they need loopholes?

We talk about assault type rifles which have ZERO to do with conceal carry permits.

What is an assault rifle?

A rifle that you can attach a bayonet to.

Bonzi Assault rifle.

Well, that's a new one.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[protectionist]

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

 

[RealDave]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

 

[protectionist]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

 

[RealDave]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

 

[daveman]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

How about hiring weapons-trained veterans for school security? I mean, you should support that, since they have training.

This should be amusing.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I saw Mark Glaze, former executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and later Everytown for Gun Safety, on Tucker Carlson’s show, discussing the school shootings.
Glaze made all of the well-known arguments for gun control….and then Carlson asked him if he thought the Promise Program contributed to the horrifying incident.

He said he was unaware of the program, had never heard of it.
Just like most Liberals/Democrats.

This anti-gun, anti-NRA, anti-Bill of Rights spokesperson, unaware of the single greatest contributor to Nikolas Cruz’s ability to slaughter 17 human beings.


If you are a Democrat, a Liberal, a gun-control supporter….I’m betting that you are, also, unaware.
And I’ll bet that you are unaware of the fact that the actions of Barack Obama played a far greater role in the massacre than the NRA.
It's a fact.





Here's how that happened.
While puzzling over why black students had a graduation rate of only 61 percent compared to 81 percent for white students, and as a result, a lower college admission rate, it was determined that it was largely because of their arrest rates.
Another fact was revealed: “black students made up two-thirds of all suspensions during the 2011-2012 school year despite comprising only 40 percent of the student body.”
Obama Program May Have Helped Nikolas Cruz Slip Through the Cracks



Using the usual Liberal divining rod, and looking for ways to hide.....er, correct the behavior that led to suspensions and arrests,…. These deep thinkers deduced that it must be racial bias leading to the arrests.

Using the power, status and treasury of government….”President Obama’s program rewarded local governments with grants if they kept school arrests down.’
And he threatened to charge them with racism if they didn't!!!




Get it?

Schools no longer suspended miscreants, and police….like the Broward Sheriff’s Department, no longer arrested those eligible.
Nikolas Cruz committed numerous acts that made him eligible for suspension and arrest…in a sane world.

But he wasn’t arrested, because of the Obama program.




You didn’t know this….did you?

Did you know that The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Fool me once....shame on you.

Fool me twice.....shame on me.

 

[protectionist]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

You are the ass. I have no desire whatsoever to allow untrained people to carry guns anywhere. Of course that would be ridiculous, and I've never heard of anybody endorsing such a foolish idea.

I've also never heard of any place where people can carry guns just from paying a fee. Sounds nuts.

You sure you're not just making this up ? With such an outlandish claim, you should be posting a source link to support it. I notice you're not doing that

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

How about hiring weapons-trained veterans for school security? I mean, you should support that, since they have training.

This should be amusing.

Logic, experience, and common sense mean nothing to that sort.....he won't even consider it unless the party tells him to.


That's how it works when one is RealDumb.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I saw Mark Glaze, former executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and later Everytown for Gun Safety, on Tucker Carlson’s show, discussing the school shootings.
Glaze made all of the well-known arguments for gun control….and then Carlson asked him if he thought the Promise Program contributed to the horrifying incident.

He said he was unaware of the program, had never heard of it.
Just like most Liberals/Democrats.

This anti-gun, anti-NRA, anti-Bill of Rights spokesperson, unaware of the single greatest contributor to Nikolas Cruz’s ability to slaughter 17 human beings.


If you are a Democrat, a Liberal, a gun-control supporter….I’m betting that you are, also, unaware.
And I’ll bet that you are unaware of the fact that the actions of Barack Obama played a far greater role in the massacre than the NRA.
It's a fact.





Here's how that happened.
While puzzling over why black students had a graduation rate of only 61 percent compared to 81 percent for white students, and as a result, a lower college admission rate, it was determined that it was largely because of their arrest rates.
Another fact was revealed: “black students made up two-thirds of all suspensions during the 2011-2012 school year despite comprising only 40 percent of the student body.”
Obama Program May Have Helped Nikolas Cruz Slip Through the Cracks



Using the usual Liberal divining rod, and looking for ways to hide.....er, correct the behavior that led to suspensions and arrests,…. These deep thinkers deduced that it must be racial bias leading to the arrests.

Using the power, status and treasury of government….”President Obama’s program rewarded local governments with grants if they kept school arrests down.’
And he threatened to charge them with racism if they didn't!!!




Get it?

Schools no longer suspended miscreants, and police….like the Broward Sheriff’s Department, no longer arrested those eligible.
Nikolas Cruz committed numerous acts that made him eligible for suspension and arrest…in a sane world.

But he wasn’t arrested, because of the Obama program.




You didn’t know this….did you?

Did you know that The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Fool me once....shame on you.

Fool me twice.....shame on me.

I bet you've noticed that that aphorism doesn't apply to Democrats. Look at how many times their lies/charges against Trump have failed and been proven lies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

You are the ass. I have no desire whatsoever to allow untrained people to carry guns anywhere. Of course that would be ridiculous, and I've never heard of anybody endorsing such a foolish idea.

I've also never heard of any place where people can carry guns just from paying a fee. Sounds nuts.

You sure you're not just making this up ? With such an outlandish claim, you should be posting a source link to support it. I notice you're not doing that

"Let’s say we want the bare minimum, just enough to pass the safety requirement for gun ownership. In Maryland, there’s a company that will charge you $100 for that training. The cost, then, would be about $71.8 million for all of our teachers.

.....more robust training means that the cost for our 718,000 teachers spikes to $718 million. There would almost certainly be some efficiencies of scale that would come into play here — systems would be developed to train teachers quickly and at less cost — but the figure would still likely run into the hundreds of millions of dollars."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ming-americas-schools/?utm_term=.296687096db3


WHAT?????

That's it????????



Here's a place to start:
"...the nearly $450 million spent annually on National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Network and a number of small regional public radio and TV networks would disappear."
Trump Budget Has Public Broadcasting in a Fight for its Life

Here's another 'donation'...
"...Planned Parenthood receives approximately $500 million a year in taxpayer funds, as a GAO report indicated last year."
How Much of Your Tax Money Does Planned Parenthood Get? A New Report Will Tell You | LifeNews.com



What the heck are we waiting for???????

 

[RealDave]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

View attachment 320242

So, you wanted our troops to remain in Iraq with no protection agreement?

And we shoild allow any untrained gun toter around our children.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

FALSE! They had ONE armed guard (who didn't guard), and was a gun-free zone for school staff, visitors, and everyone else. Gun-free zone, all the way. Invitation to mass shooters.

So they had an armed guard.

You God damn stupid fucks want any yeahoo untrained gun toter to be able to be around our children? How stupid is that?>

Ha ha. Typical leftist Strawman behavior. You take a perfectly valid argument, change it's components into something completely different, and then act like you're still debating the original scenario.

Back to reality. No, Mr Strawman. Nobody is talking about "any Yahoo untrained gun toter" (except you).

I have a CCW license, and I carry a pistol almost everywhere I go. So for all you liberals who are gun clueless, do you think I was able to get that license and gun as easy as buying a candy bar?

I had to have an unblemished background, passing a background check, waiting 3 days to get the gun. I had to qualify for the license, either by taking a gun safety course, or have military or police background.

How stupid is it for you to want our kids to be around unarmed adults, who are unable to take action in a shooting emergency ? It is exactly this kind of mindless idiocy that gas given us gun-free zones, and the mass shootings they invite.

How dumb do you have to be to not know that 1 armed guard is not enough ? What if there is a group of criminal shooters ? What if the 1 guard you have fails to act ? (as occured at Parkland) - especially when there is a stupid promise program in effect, discouraging intervention.

Your brainless attitude is symptomatic of the leftist anti-gun culture in America, that has given us millions of Americans who are clueless be about guns, law enforcement and self-defense, and when you post in forums like this, all you do is show off your ignorance.

You are a danger to America, and many people have died because of your foolishness.

It is that easy in a lot of states. You pay your fee, you get to carry a loaded gun. There is no or little training requirement.

It is a FACT that many gun toters have little or no training. & assfucks klike you want them to do it in school yards.

You are the ass. I have no desire whatsoever to allow untrained people to carry guns anywhere. Of course that would be ridiculous, and I've never heard of anybody endorsing such a foolish idea.

I've also never heard of any place where people can carry guns just from paying a fee. Sounds nuts.

You sure you're not just making this up ? With such an outlandish claim, you should be posting a source link to support it. I notice you're not doing that

"Let’s say we want the bare minimum, just enough to pass the safety requirement for gun ownership. In Maryland, there’s a company that will charge you $100 for that training. The cost, then, would be about $71.8 million for all of our teachers.

.....more robust training means that the cost for our 718,000 teachers spikes to $718 million. There would almost certainly be some efficiencies of scale that would come into play here — systems would be developed to train teachers quickly and at less cost — but the figure would still likely run into the hundreds of millions of dollars."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ming-americas-schools/?utm_term=.296687096db3


WHAT?????

That's it????????



Here's a place to start:
"...the nearly $450 million spent annually on National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Network and a number of small regional public radio and TV networks would disappear."
Trump Budget Has Public Broadcasting in a Fight for its Life

Here's another 'donation'...
"...Planned Parenthood receives approximately $500 million a year in taxpayer funds, as a GAO report indicated last year."
How Much of Your Tax Money Does Planned Parenthood Get? A New Report Will Tell You | LifeNews.com



What the heck are we waiting for???????

Yet another ignorant Trumpette.

Planned Parenthood gets reimbursements for services rendered. Cut off PP & those people would have to go elsewhere for those services & the government would still pay for them.