The
fact is if your candidate cannot handle a moderator in a controlled environment, you should be concerned with what he is going to do in a real situation...
My candidate did very well last debate considering it was a preplanned 2-against-1-if-need-be flop. Fortunately, the last moderator made Obama look like a suckling, and not a president. At one point, he told her to repeat the nasty words she said to Romney for him. lol What a lot of stagecraft went into creating a footshoot to Obama and not to Romney!
They're telling us they're not collaborating with Obama? What a huge roll of BS the lying media puts out.
Schieffer should be discarded as moderator. He's going into this calling one candidate's supporters "losers." Instead of telling America not to pay attention to the moderator, he actually just painted a huge target on his own heiney, and I hope he kicks himself for saying such a ridiculous, biased, nasty, horrible thing. He's so fulla himself his guts are coming out of his toenails.
Again I ask for sources......I do not like either candidate, I want someone to do a great job not throw more bile at the public, nevertheless, you still have failed to prove that which you have asserted regarding barring reporters or selective media coverage.
Nobody can change a person's dislike for two candidates, and I'm no wave-wander that could change a man's heart, Mr. Connery.
The press of today does not play by the rules the press employed in years past, which I took for granted when growing up. they are not perfectly neutral. This week's monitor showed his hand when he chided the American people to not pay attention to the moderator, then made a statement that only the LOSERS would object. That's a hand tip into a hand that is stacked in self-interest of the leftist machine. Sorry if it may seem not important to you, but it truly set off my BS alarm system developed over years of dealing with leftist demagoguery.
Last week's performance by the moderator we are now chided for paying attention to set up and pitted likely times for Obama to go negative at times in which Romney was disallowed from answering no less than 7 liar charges made by Obama. You think Obama was clueless about that when he walked into that hall? If he wasn't, his handlers certainly were in on it, because he only went negative on Romney when Romney was not allowed to talk back in defense. That is manufactured staging, to produce an image that may or may not be accurate, used by none other than stage managers to fool people into thinking a mere mortal is a demon or a hero or whatever they wish him to be presenting him in a nice little package that viewers buy or reject, according to the wishes of none other than the director of the fiction.
I'm sure that will not be considered as proof by you, but I don't think it was accidental the timing of negatives and self-approbations on Obama's part last week.
I didn't listen closely this week, I listened to some but not all of this little word war between two competitors. The only thing that really stood out to me would not have stood out to anyone else, I'm sure. President Obama came out as waspish about nearly every negative he went on about. Others will have to determine what they think, but I got bit by a wasp about 6 weeks ago, and while I'm not allergic, eew. It's no fun.
I have no other source for my opinions than that. We are an informal board at USMB, we often agree to disagree.
I hope you find some semblance of peace with one or other of the candidates. My love for conservativism is not a source that you seem to be seeking. I hope you find a source that brings you to decide if you wish to vote on a candidate. I'm a total stranger, and unlike Gallup polls that have been around since 1935, I haven't been.
The Romney Fiscal Issues Page - there is a section discussing how Romney will "
Exercise fiscal responsibility to restore economic opportunity." and another discussing how Romney plans to "
Reform entitlement programs to keep them solvent and put America on a path to prosperity."
The reason I favor the Romney campaign is solely on account of my agreement with the bases of his Issues pages, and his pledge to make a budget and work on reducing the overspending and national debt through wise measures.
Romney jobs plan - One of several pages
Romney's Issues page
I'm not certain what you expect, but if you use the three links above, you will know of Romney's plans. The ones that are important to me relate to fiscal matters, because that is what in the past presidents have tended to. The current occupant has not seen fit to do a budget, and the country's credit rating has been downgraded twice under this spendthrift approach to neglecting to get Congress to agree to a budget.
We have to have someone passing a budget on top of the table. This business of not having one has made it too easy to use the bully pulpit to print money and take that instead of going through Congress as the Constitution clearly designates as the tax collectors. No collections no money has been the past. Printing more money... I just don't like that as a Pet Rock project fund for money taxpayers can't come up with.
I hope the links help you make your choice. No way could I influence that having only my opinion that is so frail, based on my view of the administration which seems so confused in its role as wanting to be everything--executive, legislative, and judicial all rolled into one. That's a lean toward monarchy any way you cut it, and in this land, our fathers died to make sure people would forever not have to answer to a strong central power like King George of England in the 1776 era.
http://www.mittromney.com/jobsplan