Left-wing criminals in the US supported the Cuban dictatorship

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,628
138
The left supported Batista's criminal regime, which flooded Cuba with the American mafia. In 1952, Truman even recognized the military coup of Batista and the overthrow of the legitimate government as legal. At this time, mafiosi were engaged in human trafficking and pimping in Cuba.

Fidel Castro, despite his "communist" regime, was a positive leader for Cuba.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
In fact, Castro was the successor to the Eisenhower cause. He was brought to power by Eisenhower's henchman Khrushchev, who fought against Kennedy. Therefore, Fidel was on the right side.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Cuban girls are pretty. They should be invited to the US to revive the American pin-up and oust the ugly fat Europeans that the leftist Trump brought.
 
The accusations of the Reds in fanning the fire of the world revolution look especially ridiculous against the background of the fanning of the fire of the Third World War by the capitalists.
 
The left supported Batista's criminal regime, which flooded Cuba with the American mafia. In 1952, Truman even recognized the military coup of Batista and the overthrow of the legitimate government as legal. At this time, mafiosi were engaged in human trafficking and pimping in Cuba.

Fidel Castro, despite his "communist" regime, was a positive leader for Cuba.
Go to Miracle Mile and stand on a street corner wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt telling everybody that and see what happens.
I already know: Multiple big purses you'd swear have a couple bricks in them upside your head nonstop. Fuckin' POS commie.
 
Last edited:
The left supported Batista's criminal regime, which flooded Cuba with the American mafia. In 1952, Truman even recognized the military coup of Batista and the overthrow of the legitimate government as legal. At this time, mafiosi were engaged in human trafficking and pimping in Cuba.

Fidel Castro, despite his "communist" regime, was a positive leader for Cuba.
That's why they had to hide his grave, right?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Go to Miracle Mile and stand on a street corner wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt telling everybody that and see what happens.
I already know: Multiple big purses you'd swear have a couple bricks in them upside your head nonstop. Fuckin' POS commie.
Fidel Castro was a protege of the Right, he fought against proteges of the left. He cannot be considered a communist in that sense.

Generally Latin Reds are mostly anarchists
 
Left wing criminals lol? What the heck are you talking about? It was a republican carnival down there in Cuba with gambling prostitution a rich oligarchy and a whole bunch of poverty stricken poor people. It was totally corrupt and Fidel only had 23 people basically and beat the corrupt right wing dictatorship. It's too bad we forced him into the arms of the Russians. Great job GOP!
 
Cuba was the playground for the rich and famous and Battista wasn't much different from the Vegas Casino bosses in the late 50's. Ike handed the problem over to the CIA and they screwed it up in their usual fashion by backing a communist revolutionary. Did the Cuban revolution work out any better for the people of Cuba than Battista's corrupt government? The ironic thing is that JFK's A.G. brother became fixated on Castro and Cuba and used the CIA (illegally) to raise another freaking revolutionary army to overthrow the guy they helped to get into power. The mess at the Bay of Pigs escalated into the Cuban Missile Crisis.
 
It's weird to see people who know nothing about the history of Cuba trying to frame what happened then, by the politics of today.

The Democrats and Republicans were united in their attitude to Castro. The very liberal Adlai Stevenson, Democrat candidate for President in 1952 and 1956, representing the US in the UN, lied through his teeth about the Bay of Pigs invasion [run by the Americans], presenting 'evidence' that had been forged by the CIA. (His admirers claim he was duped, which I find unlikely, although possible.)

It's especially strange to see socialists become apologists for the Democrats. This is a fairly recent development: historically, socialists have called both Democrats and Republicans 'capitalist parties', and have supported neither. (The exception was the Communist Party, who -- except in 1948 -- worked for, and in, the Democratic Party, to further their fundamental mission as Soviet border guards, trying to get the Democrats to take a softer line on the Soviet Union.)

But then of course everything has changed: socialists used to hate the big corporations, and support the working class. Now they love the big 'woke' corporations, and despise the non-college educated working class.
 
JFK's use of the CIA to raise, train and equip an illegal invasion of a sovereign country should have kicked his administration out of Washington but the media defended and supported the criminal administration.
 
JFK's use of the CIA to raise, train and equip an illegal invasion of a sovereign country should have kicked his administration out of Washington but the media defended and supported the criminal administration.
Hmmmm.... but then, if Khruschev had put missiles in Cuba anyway, not trusting whover JFK's successor was, we might have had WWIII.

When the missile silos were discovered, our military was straining at the bit to invade. (I had a friend whose mother was a photographic analyst in Washington -- during the Cuban Missile Crisis, she was scanning aerial photos of Havana, looking for soccer fields and similar places where the Airborne could come down.)

But JFK had read Barbara Tuchman's The Guns of August -- about how the Great Powers stumbled in into WWI. (He was so impressed with it, and the danger of sleepwalking into war, that he had 250 copies bought and distributed to all the generals and admirals.)

So he held back the military, and went for a blockade. Had we invaded Cuba, the Soviets already there would almost certainly have responded with tactical nuclear missiles that were already there, but that we did not know about.
[ Cuban Missile Crisis - Wikipedia ]

So we were lucky we had JFK in place. 'We' being the human species. Of course, first in line for credit for preventing WW3 in 1963 is the late Commodore Vassily Arkhipov, to whom a solid gold statue should be raised in every American, European and Russian population center.
[ Vasily Arkhipov - Wikipedia ]
 
JFK's use of the CIA to raise, train and equip an illegal invasion of a sovereign country should have kicked his administration out of Washington but the media defended and supported the criminal administration.
Frat Rat

The Monroe Doctrine required a real invasion, not one that let Cuban patriots get slaughtered because preppy prettyboy JFK didn't have the guts to back them up. After losing political support because of his confused focus, he went to the other extreme, becoming a loose cannon during the Cuban missile crisis and almost causing World War Three. His undeserved popularity from that tough-guy act proves he would have gone full-force into Vietnam and wound up with same reputation LBJ has.
 
Hmmmm.... but then, if Khruschev had put missiles in Cuba anyway, not trusting whover JFK's successor was, we might have had WWIII.

When the missile silos were discovered, our military was straining at the bit to invade. (I had a friend whose mother was a photographic analyst in Washington -- during the Cuban Missile Crisis, she was scanning aerial photos of Havana, looking for soccer fields and similar places where the Airborne could come down.)

But JFK had read Barbara Tuchman's The Guns of August -- about how the Great Powers stumbled in into WWI. (He was so impressed with it, and the danger of sleepwalking into war, that he had 250 copies bought and distributed to all the generals and admirals.)

So he held back the military, and went for a blockade. Had we invaded Cuba, the Soviets already there would almost certainly have responded with tactical nuclear missiles that were already there, but that we did not know about.
[ Cuban Missile Crisis - Wikipedia ]

So we were lucky we had JFK in place. 'We' being the human species. Of course, first in line for credit for preventing WW3 in 1963 is the late Commodore Vassily Arkhipov, to whom a solid gold statue should be raised in every American, European and Russian population center.
[ Vasily Arkhipov - Wikipedia ]
Camelot Calamity

We had missiles in Turkey that were just as much of a threat to the Russians as the Cuban missiles were to us. So the whole thing could have been settled behind the scenes by removing both threats.

JFK and Bobby got great political capital by their out-of-control cowboy act, but it cost them their lives. Russians don't back down unless they can demand a high price for that embarrassment. They also deposed Khrushchev for not understanding JFK's megalomaniac instability.
 
The left supported Batista's criminal regime, which flooded Cuba with the American mafia. In 1952, Truman even recognized the military coup of Batista and the overthrow of the legitimate government as legal. At this time, mafiosi were engaged in human trafficking and pimping in Cuba.

Fidel Castro, despite his "communist" regime, was a positive leader for Cuba.
Much can be said about the corruption of the Batista Regime. But in fact you are wrong. In general the people of Cuba were far better off than under the viscious and evil COMMUNIST regijme of Castro. He was a brutal ruler he was no positive leader.
 

Forum List

Back
Top