Left says right photoshopped OUT MAGA graphic on Mormon church shooter’s shirt. Right says left photoshopped it in.

[candycorn]

Biden and many Democrats call Trump and Republicans Fascists. ANTIFA stands for anti-facists. The Kirk killer inscribed “Hey Fascist, catch” on one of his bullet casings. Yeah, they are all yours and you know it. They were inspired by and buy into the rhetoric your party spews on a daily basis.

Still no mention of Biden or any other democrat. Thanks for confirming

 

[SweetTea]

Where the hell have you been for the last few decades? You call us communists all the damn time.

No, you haven't heard Republican politicians or the mainstream media repeatedly call Democrats Communists. Sure, on message boards we do, but not nearly as open and blatant as what is going on with the left.

 

[candycorn]

Right MAGA distances from killers,

They’re wearing a Trump shirt and waving a trump banner. You cannot

 

[Marener]

No, you haven't heard Republican politicians or the mainstream media repeatedly call Democrats Communists. Sure, on message boards we do, but not nearly as open and blatant as what is going on with the left.

Rush Limbaugh coined the term feminazis like 30 years ago. Trump gave him the presidential medal of freedom.

Again, don't want to be called a fascists? Don't do things that are fascist.

Easy peasy!

 

[SweetTea]

Rush Limbaugh coined the term feminazis like 30 years ago. Trump gave him the presidential medal of freedom.

Again, don't want to be called a fascists? Don't do things that are fascist.

Easy peasy!

So you if you don't want to be called a Communist, don't do things that are Communistic. When Republican politicians start using "Communist" as often as Democratic politicians and mainstream media personalities use "fascist", you let me know.

 

[Marener]

So you if you don't want to be called a Communist, don't do things that are Communistic. When Republican politicians start using "Communist" as often as Democratic politicians and mainstream media personalities use "fascist", you let me know.

Notice how the left never used government threats to take away the right to say this.

Unlike the Trump administration.

 

[SweetTea]

Notice how the left never used government threats to take away the right to say this.

Unlike the Trump administration.

They didn't have to. I don't recall it being an issue like it is today with Democrats.

They did however take away the voices of decent by pressuring social media outlets to scrub what they deemed as misinformation.

 

[Marener]

They didn't have to.

Neither does Trump, but you're allowing him to do so. In fact, it seems like you guys voted for him to do so, given he made these threats during the election.

 

[SweetTea]

Neither does Trump, but you're allowing him to do so. In fact, it seems like you guys voted for him to do so, given he made these threats during the election.

So it is fascist when Trump does it but not when Democrats do it. Gotcha.

 

[OldFlame]

Who cares? This wasn't a politically motivated crime, unlike most of the shootings of late, which were all lefties with an ax to grind and using violence and murder to do it.

 

[Delldude]

Did you look at the time stamp from ******* Facebook?

From your link:

Mj Johnston
Dates CAN IN FACT be changed!

 

[Marener]

So it is fascist when Trump does it but not when Democrats do it. Gotcha.

Dems never threatened government punishment for free speech.

Remember how Trump threatened to revoke FCC license of broadcasters who say things that he didn't like? Dems never did that, even when Limbaugh was calling people communists, Marxists and "feminazis".

 

[Delldude]

Dems never threatened government punishment for free speech.

Oh really? Ever heard of the Fairness Doctrine repealed in 1987 and on the dems plate to reinstate since the birth of conservative talk radio?

 

[Marener]

Oh really? Ever heard of the Fairness Doctrine repealed in 1987 and on the dems plate to reinstate since the birth of conservative talk radio?

That was 40 years ago. It was never reinstated.

You need a new talking point.

 

[Delldude]

That was 40 years ago. It was never reinstated.

You need a new talking point.

This is what you claimed:

Dems never threatened government punishment for free speech.

Dems have tried unsuccessfully since then................did under Bush, last time was 2019 by a bill introduced by your favorite head of DNI, Tulsi Gabbard.

 

[Delldude]

Dems never threatened government punishment for free speech.

AI response:

Instances of Democrats accused of threatening free speech

• Targeting social media platforms: Some Democratic lawmakers have been criticized for pressuring social media platforms to censor certain types of content or users. In 2021 and 2022, multiple reports indicated that officials from the Biden administration met with tech companies and urged them to take action against what they deemed "misinformation," which critics viewed as government-coerced censorship.
• "Hate speech" legislation: Some Democratic politicians and liberal activists have called for laws or regulations targeting "hate speech". Critics argue these efforts can be unconstitutional, as the Supreme Court has consistently held that "hate speech" is generally protected under the First Amendment.
• Proposed disinformation boards: In 2022, the Biden administration's creation of a "Disinformation Governance Board" within the Department of Homeland Security was criticized by some as an attempt to control speech. The board was paused and ultimately shut down amid controversy.
• NRA v. Vullo case: In a 2024 Supreme Court case, NRA v. Vullo, the Court found that a Democratic official, Maria Vullo, violated the First Amendment by pressuring banks and insurers to stop doing business with the NRA. This was seen by some as an abuse of government power to silence a political opponent.

 

[Marener]

Targeting social media platforms: Some Democratic lawmakers have been criticized for pressuring social media platforms to censor certain types of content or users. In 2021 and 2022, multiple reports indicated that officials from the Biden administration met with tech companies and urged them to take action against what they deemed "misinformation," which critics viewed as government-coerced censorship.

No threats of government punishment.

"Hate speech" legislation: Some Democratic politicians and liberal activists have called for laws or regulations targeting "hate speech". Critics argue these efforts can be unconstitutional, as the Supreme Court has consistently held that "hate speech" is generally protected under the First Amendment.

Legislation that never happened.

Proposed disinformation boards: In 2022, the Biden administration's creation of a "Disinformation Governance Board" within the Department of Homeland Security was criticized by some as an attempt to control speech. The board was paused and ultimately shut down amid controversy.

There was no attempt to actually control speech.

NRA v. Vullo case: In a 2024 Supreme Court case, NRA v. Vullo, the Court found that a Democratic official, Maria Vullo, violated the First Amendment by pressuring banks and insurers to stop doing business with the NRA. This was seen by some as an abuse of government power to silence a political opponent.

Again, no government threats.

 

[Delldude]

Again, no government threats.

Attempts at censorship counts.

 

[Marener]

Attempts at censorship counts.

There's no censorship without a threat from the government.

Otherwise it's just more free speech.

 

[Delldude]

There's no censorship without a threat from the government.

Lawmakers are government.