I am of the position they are all skanks and swamp creatures. No business for amercians, they're too busy playing hatfields and mccoys.all good. to me the vote was a "game" and they just didn't play. both sides are anxious to tear down the other anymore and i find that as a whole so very counterproductive to what we should be doing.yep. But people with a piece of brain, knew what it meant. Especially since the senators who already said they backed the plan, didn't vote yes either. so, I appreciate it when people don't insult my intelligence. And that wasn't meant that you were. just them.great. i don't disagree on what is going on "behind" the scenes. but a Present vote is not a YES or a NO.it's what a wimp representative gives when one is wiimpy. The party affiliation tells one their vote of present meant they agreed but didn't want anyone to know they did. But we already knew that.great. but the official stance is not for or against.I disagree, a vote of present is a 'yes' vote. If they didn't care for it, no would have done the job.
What does Present mean when voting in the Senate
it could be considered a "soft no" but as far as i know "OFFICIALLY" its neither yes nor no.
all i'm saying.