Lawyers blame ChatGPT for tricking them into citing bogus case law

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
73,616
Reaction score
108,867
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
NEW YORK (AP) — Two apologetic lawyers responding to an angry judge in Manhattan federal court blamed ChatGPT Thursday for tricking them into including fictitious legal research in a court filing.

Attorneys Steven A. Schwartz and Peter LoDuca are facing possible punishment over a filing in a lawsuit against an airline that included references to past court cases that Schwartz thought were real, but were actually invented by the artificial intelligence-powered chatbot.

When Castel finished his questioning, he asked Schwartz if he had anything else to say.

“I would like to sincerely apologize,” Schwartz said.

He added that he had suffered personally and professionally as a result of the blunder and felt “embarrassed, humiliated and extremely remorseful.”

He said that he and the firm where he worked — Levidow, Levidow & Oberman — had put safeguards in place to ensure nothing similar happens again.


I got a feeling those two will be working for Dewey, Cheetem & Howe. ;)

Sorta goes right back to the competency crisis we are seeing.
How soon before doctors are removing non-existent cancer tumors found my an AI wanting to please its masters?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom