Last decade is snowiest on record!!!

[westwall]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

That's the thing. It's called natural variation. That's why you have to go back and look at averages over long periods of time. This drought for all the bleating going on is really not bad. Yet. After it has gone on for a hundred years I will be concerned. California has had multiple droughts over the last 1200 years, some of them lasting over 200 years, so, compared to that...this is a dawdle.


"So what is causing the current drought?

Ingram and other paleoclimatologists have correlated several historic megadroughts with a shift in the surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean that occurs every 20 to 30 years—something called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The PDO is similar to an El Nino event except it lasts for decades—as its name implies—whereas an El Nino event lasts 6 to 18 months. Cool phases of the PDO result in less precipitation because cooler sea temperatures bump the jet stream north, which in turn pushes off storms that would otherwise provide rain and snow to California. Ingram says entire lakes dried up in California following a cool phase of the PDO several thousand years ago. Warm phases have been linked to numerous storms along the California coast.

"We have been in a fairly cold phase of PDO since the early 2000s," says Brian Fuchs, a climatologist at the National Drought Mitigation Center, "so the drought we are seeing now makes sense."

200 Years Of Scorchitude Professor Warns California To Brace For A Mega-Drought Zero Hedge

 

[Billy_Bob]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

When you consider that the east coast was buried under 1 mile of ice and the west coast was desert... Nothing has really changed in the major scheme of things for several hundred thousand years. The ice comes and goes as does the desert conditions. As the Holocene (our current warm period) appears to be coming to a close I fear you may get to see just how fast ice begins to build up..

 

[bripat9643]

Ummm, no. That's what they did. Not me.

No, the authors explained, you cherry picked. Fair enough, it's what deniers do.

Yes the AGW cult are the true deniers of science..

Ah yes, since all of the Scientific Societies, all of the National Academies of Science and and all of the major Universities state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger, them thar pointy headed librul scientists are deniers of science.

You guys remind me of the hayseed that sits in the back of the class in grade school, commenting 'Pi aren't square, pi are round, hiyuck, hiyuch".

Yep, all the boot-licking toadies who make their living sucking up to the government endorse the government position on AGW. We are so shocked!

 

[bripat9643]

Tell me, Walleyes, an oncologist states you have cancer, your auto mechanic states you do not. So believing the oncologist rather than the auto mechanic is an appeal to authority? That is your logic, Walleyes.

Yes, the vast majority of scientists have seen and accept the evidence for a changing climate. So you go with the likes of 'Lord' Monkton and the other frauds.

The oncologist is more of a witch doctor who's diagnoses have no better an accuracy rate then pure chance.

 

[cnm]

Nothing has really changed in the major scheme of things for several hundred thousand years.

Except for increased specific humidity in lower atmospheric levels since about the '80s, wouldn't you say?

 

[cnm]

Yep, all the boot-licking toadies who make their living sucking up to the government endorse the government position on AGW. We are so shocked!

When the oil and gas industry are such notoriously bad payers.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

That's the thing. It's called natural variation. That's why you have to go back and look at averages over long periods of time. This drought for all the bleating going on is really not bad. Yet. After it has gone on for a hundred years I will be concerned. California has had multiple droughts over the last 1200 years, some of them lasting over 200 years, so, compared to that...this is a dawdle.


"So what is causing the current drought?

Ingram and other paleoclimatologists have correlated several historic megadroughts with a shift in the surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean that occurs every 20 to 30 years—something called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The PDO is similar to an El Nino event except it lasts for decades—as its name implies—whereas an El Nino event lasts 6 to 18 months. Cool phases of the PDO result in less precipitation because cooler sea temperatures bump the jet stream north, which in turn pushes off storms that would otherwise provide rain and snow to California. Ingram says entire lakes dried up in California following a cool phase of the PDO several thousand years ago. Warm phases have been linked to numerous storms along the California coast.

"We have been in a fairly cold phase of PDO since the early 2000s," says Brian Fuchs, a climatologist at the National Drought Mitigation Center, "so the drought we are seeing now makes sense."

200 Years Of Scorchitude Professor Warns California To Brace For A Mega-Drought Zero Hedge

The difference is the reality that there's now 30 million human beings living there. If one of these 200 year droughts did happen = oh'fuck.

 

[Old Rocks]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

When you consider that the east coast was buried under 1 mile of ice and the west coast was desert... Nothing has really changed in the major scheme of things for several hundred thousand years. The ice comes and goes as does the desert conditions. As the Holocene (our current warm period) appears to be coming to a close I fear you may get to see just how fast ice begins to build up..

You dumb ass, Booby, when there was continental glaciers, the West Coast was anything but a desert. There were several huge lakes in Eastern Oregon, with forests and and a wonderful assemblage of big game. The Colombia was a much larger river than today, and the Chehalis was nearly as large as todays Colombia. Even as we came out of the ice age, the land was far greener than today. As evidenced by the remains we find of the Clovis culture in the Steens.

 

[Old Rocks]

Tell me, Walleyes, an oncologist states you have cancer, your auto mechanic states you do not. So believing the oncologist rather than the auto mechanic is an appeal to authority? That is your logic, Walleyes.

Yes, the vast majority of scientists have seen and accept the evidence for a changing climate. So you go with the likes of 'Lord' Monkton and the other frauds.

The oncologist is more of a witch doctor who's diagnoses have no better an accuracy rate then pure chance.

Really? My, my, now we see what a really dumb fuck you truly are. But you just go with that auto mechanics diagnosis.

 

[skookerasbil]

Ive always been completely fascinated at how automatically the committed AGW people blindly accept ANYTHING put out on their version of climate sciecne. These people have asoltuely zero levels of curiosity!! Ive just never been able to wrap muy mind around that.......me being a person that constantly questions the official narrative of anything. I think most notably is this idea that the peer review process for these people is legit........especially when corruption in the medical peer review process has been well documented. The peer review process in climate sciecne is well guarded......but some insight has been gathered in recent years that alot of this stuff is rigged ( Climategate I and II )

Likewise......they also embrace ANYTHING Obama says. Gawd.....I dont believe much of anything anybody says in Washington..........they are all shit shovelers. But the blind obedience to the AGW gurus.............realy scary stuff imo.

 

[jc456]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

That's the thing. It's called natural variation. That's why you have to go back and look at averages over long periods of time. This drought for all the bleating going on is really not bad. Yet. After it has gone on for a hundred years I will be concerned. California has had multiple droughts over the last 1200 years, some of them lasting over 200 years, so, compared to that...this is a dawdle.


"So what is causing the current drought?

Ingram and other paleoclimatologists have correlated several historic megadroughts with a shift in the surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean that occurs every 20 to 30 years—something called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The PDO is similar to an El Nino event except it lasts for decades—as its name implies—whereas an El Nino event lasts 6 to 18 months. Cool phases of the PDO result in less precipitation because cooler sea temperatures bump the jet stream north, which in turn pushes off storms that would otherwise provide rain and snow to California. Ingram says entire lakes dried up in California following a cool phase of the PDO several thousand years ago. Warm phases have been linked to numerous storms along the California coast.

"We have been in a fairly cold phase of PDO since the early 2000s," says Brian Fuchs, a climatologist at the National Drought Mitigation Center, "so the drought we are seeing now makes sense."

200 Years Of Scorchitude Professor Warns California To Brace For A Mega-Drought Zero Hedge

The difference is the reality that there's now 30 million human beings living there. If one of these 200 year droughts did happen = oh'fuck.

and it's shame on them the 30 million for thinking they can manhandle mother nature, eh? See, I feel for them, but please, please, don't insult me or my peers with the lies that man is causing what is happening in California. That's it. Is it bad, yes, is it out of the ordinary? No. It only is because now man has moved there. THAT's It!

Call a spade a spade and stop trying to scare the world.

 

[westwall]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

That's the thing. It's called natural variation. That's why you have to go back and look at averages over long periods of time. This drought for all the bleating going on is really not bad. Yet. After it has gone on for a hundred years I will be concerned. California has had multiple droughts over the last 1200 years, some of them lasting over 200 years, so, compared to that...this is a dawdle.


"So what is causing the current drought?

Ingram and other paleoclimatologists have correlated several historic megadroughts with a shift in the surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean that occurs every 20 to 30 years—something called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The PDO is similar to an El Nino event except it lasts for decades—as its name implies—whereas an El Nino event lasts 6 to 18 months. Cool phases of the PDO result in less precipitation because cooler sea temperatures bump the jet stream north, which in turn pushes off storms that would otherwise provide rain and snow to California. Ingram says entire lakes dried up in California following a cool phase of the PDO several thousand years ago. Warm phases have been linked to numerous storms along the California coast.

"We have been in a fairly cold phase of PDO since the early 2000s," says Brian Fuchs, a climatologist at the National Drought Mitigation Center, "so the drought we are seeing now makes sense."

200 Years Of Scorchitude Professor Warns California To Brace For A Mega-Drought Zero Hedge

The difference is the reality that there's now 30 million human beings living there. If one of these 200 year droughts did happen = oh'fuck.

And what happens when the water dries up? People move. Look through history dude. It is the history of human migration, almost always due to resource depletion. The fact remains that Cali is mostly desert where the major population lives, and no amount human hubris is going to change that. The arrogance of people who think that man can just willy nilly plant his fat ass on any parcel of Earth he desires, is once again going to be shown false.

 

[westwall]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

When you consider that the east coast was buried under 1 mile of ice and the west coast was desert... Nothing has really changed in the major scheme of things for several hundred thousand years. The ice comes and goes as does the desert conditions. As the Holocene (our current warm period) appears to be coming to a close I fear you may get to see just how fast ice begins to build up..

You dumb ass, Booby, when there was continental glaciers, the West Coast was anything but a desert. There were several huge lakes in Eastern Oregon, with forests and and a wonderful assemblage of big game. The Colombia was a much larger river than today, and the Chehalis was nearly as large as todays Colombia. Even as we came out of the ice age, the land was far greener than today. As evidenced by the remains we find of the Clovis culture in the Steens.

When there was a mile thick slab of ice on the Sierra Nevada mountains the Mojave Desert, was still desert silly man. You claim to be taking geology classes, go look at the paleoclimate of the area during the late Pleistocene, early Holocene.

 

[Kosh]

That's ok AGW cult members because in about 500 million years the Earth will be uninhabitable anyway..

 

[bripat9643]

That's ok AGW cult members because in about 500 million years the Earth will be uninhabitable anyway..

More like one billion, so we better start looking for another place to camp, eh?

 

[Kosh]

That's ok AGW cult members because in about 500 million years the Earth will be uninhabitable anyway..

More like one billion, so we better start looking for another place to camp, eh?

Actually recent estimates are 500 million..

It is because the white star sun in our solar system will be too bright and too hot for life to exist on this planet.

Plants rely on carbon dioxide to generate energy through photosynthesis, so the complete removal of CO2 would be bad news for foliage. The first hints of the death of life on Earth, a study found, will come in 500 million years, when less-hardy species of plants begin to die off as global carbon dioxide levels drop.

However the AGW cult will still blame that on "Climate Change"..

 

[rdean]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

Republicans don't believe there is reduction of ice at the poles. They don't believe California is having a drought. Look at Westwall. You can link directly a site dedicated to recording the record drought on the west coast and all he sees is the Mojave Desert in Southern California. You try to educate him on how the drought is affecting that part of the country and he says, " pointless to look at what you post because it is invariably wrong" without a shred of evidence and not a single example. Worse, people like that will say you don't know how to debate because in their own tiny minds, they are "Master Debaters".

 

[jc456]

Oooooooooooooooooooooops!!!!

Meteorologist 2010s officially the snowiest decade in the east coast in the NOAA record surpassing the 1960s Climate Depot

Who's not winning??

From your link

The monster blizzard of 2015 will be adding to what is already the snowiest decade on the East Coast.

It's called "Global" Warming...or Climate Change if you prefer.

How does the increase in localised snow on the East Coast of the US balance out against the drought on the West Coast or the reduction of snow at the poles?

Republicans don't believe there is reduction of ice at the poles. They don't believe California is having a drought. Look at Westwall. You can link directly a site dedicated to recording the record drought on the west coast and all he sees is the Mojave Desert in Southern California. You try to educate him on how the drought is affecting that part of the country and he says, " pointless to look at what you post because it is invariably wrong" without a shred of evidence and not a single example. Worse, people like that will say you don't know how to debate because in their own tiny minds, they are "Master Debaters".

hahahahahahaha, what a little cry baby. what a hoot!! Skooks, check this one out, I know you'd laugh a nut sack off on this one. OMG

 

[skookerasbil]

My nut sack is always hurting in this forum from laughing too hard..........but indeed it is true.......we have people who are mental enough to think the public is convinced about climate change when it is snowing like shit out!!!

 

[skookerasbil]