Las Vegas Shooter's Criminal Past---Buh, Buh, BUh, He's Got RIGHTS!

[Little-Acorn]

technically it does not but it would go along way in preventing potential mass murders from obtaining guns.

Really? And how would it do that?

goggle universal background check

TRANSLATION: I can't back up what I said, so I'll try to pretend it's YOUR job to prove MY point.

 

[Flopper]

So did the shooter procure his weapons illegally? Sorry, I'm trying to understand the point of the thread. I still haven't seen anywhere anything was illegally done or procured. So I was assuming you thought it was, yet no evidence of such.

Huh? Background checks, it's about background checks. Who the hell is talking about procurement?

One thing I see consistently on this board by the illiterate righties, they can't comprehend more than two short sentences or a single headline. That's it.

The other thing I see is a failure to corroborate or validate their claims and comments. Links are usually to blogs, not Reuters, AP, or any other valid news agency.

Lazy or just simply not very bright?

Background checks are already the law of the land, have been for years.

Yes but they're only partially implemented. Due to lack of funding many states have made little or no progress reporting felony and mental illness data to NICS. The Justice Department doesn't prosecute background check fraud and illegal gun trafficking is not addressed.

 

[daws101]

Really? And how would it do that?

goggle universal background check

Yeah, still doesn't answer the question.

Dodge, dip, duck, dive....and dodge.

sure it does if it were implemented correctly...
my personal solution to the problem would be to severely limit the amount of ammo, clips, and guns that could be possessed by anyone.

 

[daws101]

Really? And how would it do that?

goggle universal background check

TRANSLATION: I can't back up what I said, so I'll try to pretend it's YOUR job to prove MY point.

you and marty been dating long?
if background checks were implemented properly they would be far more effective...

 

[daws101]

Huh? Background checks, it's about background checks. Who the hell is talking about procurement?

One thing I see consistently on this board by the illiterate righties, they can't comprehend more than two short sentences or a single headline. That's it.

The other thing I see is a failure to corroborate or validate their claims and comments. Links are usually to blogs, not Reuters, AP, or any other valid news agency.

Lazy or just simply not very bright?

Background checks are already the law of the land, have been for years.

Yes but they're only partially implemented. Due to lack of funding many states have made little or no progress reporting felony and mental illness data to NICS. The Justice Department doesn't prosecute background check fraud and illegal gun trafficking is not addressed.

don't confuse them with the facts....

 

[kaz]

goggle universal background check

Yeah, still doesn't answer the question.

Dodge, dip, duck, dive....and dodge.

sure it does if it were implemented correctly...
my personal solution to the problem would be to severely limit the amount of ammo, clips, and guns that could be possessed by anyone.

With "anyone" being people who follow the law ... who are not the ones who are the problem ...

 

[kaz]

goggle universal background check

TRANSLATION: I can't back up what I said, so I'll try to pretend it's YOUR job to prove MY point.

you and marty been dating long?
if background checks were implemented properly they would be far more effective...

You mean because criminals wouldn't break the law and buy an illegal gun. Google "criminal"

 

[Little-Acorn]

All these big-govt gun-haters are dancing carefully around the fact that none of their gun laws and restrictions will keep guns out of the hands of people who don't obey laws.....

....EXCEPT for a total ban on all guns for everybody, followed by massive confiscation of all guns presently in civilian hands.

They want to arrive at that slowly, a little at a time, so the frog in the kettle won't notice that the water is getting warmer.

So they only suggest a small restriction here, a ban on only certain guns there...... for now.

.

.

When do you suppose they'll notice that even their total gun ban, will work as well as the current nationwide bans on marijuana, cocaine, and exceeding the speed limit in your car?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I like to paint everyone that is different from me with a fire hose to prove my pihead points?? is that it?

This exactly is what the bed wetting far right does.

Everybody has to fit into a particular box assigned by them.

 

[daws101]

Yeah, still doesn't answer the question.

Dodge, dip, duck, dive....and dodge.

sure it does if it were implemented correctly...
my personal solution to the problem would be to severely limit the amount of ammo, clips, and guns that could be possessed by anyone.

With "anyone" being people who follow the law ... who are not the ones who are the problem ...

speak English much?
no anyone means anyone.
I inferred nothing else ,you wish I did.
as to criminals possessing guns (you seem to need clarification)
life sentence no trial.
if great bodily harm or death is caused by a firearm in a crime.
death penalty no trial.

 

[TooTall]

Good, moral, upstanding, patriotic, right-wing, cop-killing Christian Conservative Republican Teabaggers.

I doubt that he was a conservative or a Christian. A patriot would have served in the military and I don't think he did. It is not good, upstanding or moral to kill anyone. I would like to see if he was a registered Repubublican and what is a Teabagger?

That leaves right wing to debate.

 

[daws101]

TRANSLATION: I can't back up what I said, so I'll try to pretend it's YOUR job to prove MY point.

you and marty been dating long?
if background checks were implemented properly they would be far more effective...

You mean because criminals wouldn't break the law and buy an illegal gun. Google "criminal"

false ! do you always intentionally misrepresent what other people post or do you have comprehension disorder?

 

[Little-Acorn]

I like to paint everyone that is different from me with a fire hose to prove my pihead points?? is that it?

This exactly is what the bed wetting far right does.

Everybody has to fit into a particular box assigned by them.

This is what, the 28th time in the last three days, that the leftists have used the "I know you are but what am I?" defense?

 

[kaz]

you and marty been dating long?
if background checks were implemented properly they would be far more effective...

You mean because criminals wouldn't break the law and buy an illegal gun. Google "criminal"

false ! do you always intentionally misrepresent what other people post or do you have comprehension disorder?

You said to google "universal background checks"

I said to google "criminal"

A pretty direct response. Criminals don't follow your laws, hence they are criminals. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you?

 

[daws101]

All these big-govt gun-haters are dancing carefully around the fact that none of their gun laws and restrictions will keep guns out of the hands of people who don't obey laws.....

....EXCEPT for a total ban on all guns for everybody, followed by massive confiscation of all guns presently in civilian hands.

They want to arrive at that slowly, a little at a time, so the frog in the kettle won't notice that the water is getting warmer.

So they only suggest a small restriction here, a ban on only certain guns there...... for now.

.

.

When do you suppose they'll notice that even their total gun ban, will work as well as the current nationwide bans on marijuana, cocaine, and exceeding the speed limit in your car?

finally the ultimate masturbation fantasy OF THE RIGHT... comes out
no one wants to do away with the second amendment (although you guys a re famous for misinterpreting it)
you keep whining about criminals, what's your solution more cops more prisons vigilantism?
you folks want a lot but will give nothing!

or is this what you want: [ame=http://youtu.be/qLvGnro4Cgw]Frankenstein (7/8) Movie CLIP - The Torch-Wielding Mob (1931) HD - YouTube[/ame]

 

[kaz]

sure it does if it were implemented correctly...
my personal solution to the problem would be to severely limit the amount of ammo, clips, and guns that could be possessed by anyone.

With "anyone" being people who follow the law ... who are not the ones who are the problem ...

speak English much?
no anyone means anyone.
I inferred nothing else ,you wish I did.
as to criminals possessing guns (you seem to need clarification)
life sentence no trial.
if great bodily harm or death is caused by a firearm in a crime.
death penalty no trial.

Once you get that implemented, get back to us

 

[daws101]

You mean because criminals wouldn't break the law and buy an illegal gun. Google "criminal"

false ! do you always intentionally misrepresent what other people post or do you have comprehension disorder?

You said to google "universal background checks"

I said to google "criminal"

A pretty direct response. Criminals don't follow your laws, hence they are criminals. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you?

"your laws" aren't they yours too?
sorry! A direct response would have been the next post not five posts later...

 

[daws101]

With "anyone" being people who follow the law ... who are not the ones who are the problem ...

speak English much?
no anyone means anyone.
I inferred nothing else ,you wish I did.
as to criminals possessing guns (you seem to need clarification)
life sentence no trial.
if great bodily harm or death is caused by a firearm in a crime.
death penalty no trial.

Once you get that implemented, get back to us

who's us? got a gerbil in your pocket?

 

[jc456]

Universal background checks

DUH

Tell me how a universal background check stops one criminal from selling a gun to another criminal.

technically it does not but it would go along way in preventing potential mass murders from obtaining guns.

How?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I like to paint everyone that is different from me with a fire hose to prove my pihead points?? is that it?

This exactly is what the bed wetting far right does.

Everybody has to fit into a particular box assigned by them.

This is what, the 28th time in the last three days, that the leftists have used the "I know you are but what am I?" defense?

The Republican mainstream is telling you TP parasites' free ride is over with the enormous number of TP defeats in the primaries.