Landslide!

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I've learned that if you say something you don't like, you must be lying. Ask them what the lie is, and they toss out an insult.

Meh.

It hurts the feelz of magaturds.

 

[SeaMajor7]

MEANINGLESS WORDS IN CAPS

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

You're dumb as a ******* post.

 

[SeaMajor7]

You're dumb as a ******* post.

Grow up, stupid.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Grow up, stupid.

Eat shit, scumbag.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Just wanted to clarify something for future reference. Being a numbers geek, I wanted to check something out.

I'm told, on a pretty regular basis, that Trump's 2024 win was a "landslide". When I point out that he didn't even receive half the votes, or when I point out that his popular vote margin of victory was only 1.5%, I'm told those don't matter. The only fallback, of course, is the Electoral College vote, 312-226. So it's not about Americans or people, it's about the Electoral College. Okay.

Let's look at that result from a historical perspective, shall we?

As it turns out, both of Trump's wins were near the historical bottom in terms of percentage of electoral votes won (since the number of electoral votes have changed over the years). In fact, both Clinton and Obama had a higher percentage in their wins. Please see below.

In fairness, both parties just love to call any win a "mandate", which is bullshit. We are a 50/50 country and hopefully we'll get a President who understands what that means before it's too late. But pretending that Trump's complete destruction of our institutions and standing in the world is justified by a "landslide" victory is pure bullshit.

Mandate Schmandate......

If you can do it, you do it.

Good grief

 

[Mac1958]

You're dumb as a ******* post.

They'll still think it was a landslide.

They have their own definitions in that world.

 

[marvin martian]

They'll still think it was a landslide.

They have their own definitions in that world.

Your impotent rage is hilarious.

 

[berg80]

In fairness, both parties just love to call any win a "mandate", which is bullshit. We are a 50/50 country and hopefully we'll get a President who understands what that means before it's too late.

My quibble with the notion of a 50/50 country is the positive polling margins Dems enjoy on virtually every issue of great importance to the country.
I use the support for the ACA as an analogy. After it was passed many people said they didn't like it. Once it was broken down in its component parts the favorability was a much different picture. Sorry, just a pet peeve.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Your impotent rage is hilarious.

Magaturds pretending to be 'winners' is even more hilarious.

 

[XponentialChaos]

MAGA doesn’t define “landslide” with objective numerical values. It’s more emotion based. Similarly, they use the term “rigged”, not based on any objective facts, but based entirely on emotion.

“Landslide” and “rigged” are almost exact opposites for them. It’s actually very simple with them.

When their candidate wins, he won in a “landslide”.

When their candidate loses, the election was “rigged”.

 

[The Duke]

Darn! It's almost as if they don't appreciate the effort I made to clarify!

Darn!

Trust me, you've clarified and defined your unhinged raging TDS quite sufficiently.
Also:

 

[struth]

Just wanted to clarify something for future reference. Being a numbers geek, I wanted to check something out.

I'm told, on a pretty regular basis, that Trump's 2024 win was a "landslide". When I point out that he didn't even receive half the votes, or when I point out that his popular vote margin of victory was only 1.5%, I'm told those don't matter. The only fallback, of course, is the Electoral College vote, 312-226. So it's not about Americans or people, it's about the Electoral College. Okay.

Let's look at that result from a historical perspective, shall we?

As it turns out, both of Trump's wins were near the historical bottom in terms of percentage of electoral votes won (since the number of electoral votes have changed over the years). In fact, both Clinton and Obama had a higher percentage in their wins. Please see below.

In fairness, both parties just love to call any win a "mandate", which is bullshit. We are a 50/50 country and hopefully we'll get a President who understands what that means before it's too late. But pretending that Trump's complete destruction of our institutions and standing in the world is justified by a "landslide" victory is pure bullshit.

Did you not know the electoral college is how we elect Presidents? Wow

I am embarrassed for you

 

[The Duke]

They'll still think it was a landslide.

They have their own definitions in that world.

312-226 Mac. Democrats may not get elected for another decade or so.
Largely because many are just like Mac1958 and annoying AF.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Just wanted to clarify something for future reference. Being a numbers geek, I wanted to check something out.

I'm told, on a pretty regular basis, that Trump's 2024 win was a "landslide". When I point out that he didn't even receive half the votes, or when I point out that his popular vote margin of victory was only 1.5%, I'm told those don't matter. The only fallback, of course, is the Electoral College vote, 312-226. So it's not about Americans or people, it's about the Electoral College. Okay.

Let's look at that result from a historical perspective, shall we?

As it turns out, both of Trump's wins were near the historical bottom in terms of percentage of electoral votes won (since the number of electoral votes have changed over the years). In fact, both Clinton and Obama had a higher percentage in their wins. Please see below.

In fairness, both parties just love to call any win a "mandate", which is bullshit. We are a 50/50 country and hopefully we'll get a President who understands what that means before it's too late. But pretending that Trump's complete destruction of our institutions and standing in the world is justified by a "landslide" victory is pure bullshit.

You didn’t win a single swing state. That’s a landslide.

 

[Nostra]

Mac….Pssssssssst…..you lost.

Grow a pair and deal with it.

 

[leftwinger]

My quibble with the notion of a 50/50 country is the positive polling margins Dems enjoy on virtually every issue of great importance to the country.
I use the support for the ACA as an analogy. After it was passed many people said they didn't like it. Once it was broken down in its component parts the favorability was a much different picture. Sorry, just a pet peeve.

NOTHING IS 50-50 You dumb OX.
ALL Polls are rigged by LW media (100% meaningless).

Maybe 15 states are permanently corrupted. They simply generate almost any number of ballots they desire.
They got caught and found out in 2020 in those five swing states. Now there is some resistance to the fraud in thise swing states.

That leaves maybe 10 states rigged permanent by deep state. Just SHUP you fool.

 

[Carson]

Polls are invalid, manipulated and untrue.

Yeah huh? Which is it? Who do you wanna believe, you poor little Trump sycophant….

Trump says ‘polls are fake’ before bragging about poll showing his popularity

thehill.com

 

[Carson]

.

Condolences.

When it explodes, you don't have far to travel to make it to the safety of the Dakotas. You'll be welcome.

Just skip the blue haven of Minnesota.

Also, Iowa can be sketchy.


.

So Iowa is finally waking the **** up? Oh do tell since 42% of the people that work in the meat packing plants are undocumented workers who have stopped going to work and Iowa is feeling the pain

 

[BluesLegend]

They'll still think it was a landslide.

They have their own definitions in that world.

Cry harder losers.