So you feel everything he has done is Constitutional by the law and the spirit ?
You do know legal does not equate necessarily with constitutional ?
After all slavery was legal at one time
As for the logical fallacy- don't play dumb
Your statement was logically fallacious because a "negative" fact about someone's personal character has nothing to do with the logical merits of the person's arguments (the cliche statement)
Granted, one could argue that your statement is just a qualifying statement with no intended connection- but I tend to doubt that
When our current Constitution was voted into place, how many of those people were Constitutional scholars ?