Landlord sued for obeying the law and evicting illegal aliens

[HereWeGoAgain]

Not if he tried to do something when he found out.

no proof he did.
next desperate speculation.

So the whole law suite is a figment of your little mind?

pull that out of your ass too?
there is no evidence that when he found out or knew all along that he did anything to stop it .
am I typing too fast for you?

Show me the evidence that he was a coconspirator.
But no matter how much you want to twist logic the fact remains he is being sued for following the law.

none needed, he already proved he was by not evicting them immediately.
he only followed the law because it was at this point to his advantage.
if the situation had been different this never would have happened .
the land lord as patriot shit won't cut it.

He tried to do something about it,read the article.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Apparently you didnt read the article either.

Apparently you're talking out your ass.

great response......continue to show your ignorance,fine by me.

it was a appropriate response to your false assumption.

Sorry for my mistake ...and your apparent lack of information retention.
The article made it pretty clear the illegals moved in with legal renters.

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

 

[Asclepias]

Apparently you're talking out your ass.

great response......continue to show your ignorance,fine by me.

it was a appropriate response to your false assumption.

Sorry for my mistake ...and your apparent lack of information retention.
The article made it pretty clear the illegals moved in with legal renters.

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no proof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

 

[gipper]

I love liberals who ask a million questions but never answer one single one put before them.

Do you believe a landlord should be able to ask renters and potential renters and their families to prove they are legal residents before renting to them or continuing to rent to them?

Now, do I believe this landlord could be found guilty of housing illegal residents? Yes, it's obvious that he has been. Whether he should be prosecuted or not is another matter entirely.

The answer would be yes if he / they had done that obviously they didn't.
The question is, does the landlords racketeering supercede the tenants illegal status.
you can stfu now.

Let's see now...the central government refuses to follow the law, by letting in millions of illegals and refusing to deport them, but this landlord is unlawful.

CRAZY!!!

False comparison! But you had to say something

I was not comparing.

If the central government refuses to follow the law, why should anyone else?

More flawed "logic".
So would you cut off your dick because everyone else did?

Everyone else is the government in your small mind.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

great response......continue to show your ignorance,fine by me.

it was a appropriate response to your false assumption.

Sorry for my mistake ...and your apparent lack of information retention.
The article made it pretty clear the illegals moved in with legal renters.

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no proof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

It says it in the article. Read it.

 

[gipper]

If the central government refuses to follow the law, why should anyone else?

That's the question the repubs should ask but they never do.

Every American should.

 

[Asclepias]

it was a appropriate response to your false assumption.

Sorry for my mistake ...and your apparent lack of information retention.
The article made it pretty clear the illegals moved in with legal renters.

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no jproof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

It says it in the article. Read it.

No it doesnt say it in the article. I read it twice. Show me one quote that says they were illegal aliens.

 

[Asclepias]

I found a more credible article. Turns out the people were undocumented immigrants as opposed to illegal aliens as claimed in the OP.

http://thinkhttp://thinkprogress.or...5/3781605/waples-mobile-home-latino-families/

 

[bodecea]

Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code says it's a federal felony to knowingly encourage illegals to live here and this landlord would obviously be doing that if he let them stay. He has no legal choice and yet he's being sued!!!

Illegal Immigrants Sue After Landlord Demands Documentation For Housing [VIDEO]

may 24 2016 Four Latino families filed papers to sue their Virginia landlord Monday after he threatened eviction due to illegal family members living on the premises.

The civil rights lawsuit filed by families living in Waples Mobile Home Park in Fairfax County, Va., claims it is discriminatory to require a social security number for residency. The landlords at the mobile home park are requiring residents to provide either a social security card, passport or valid visa with documentation to renew their leases, reports The Washington Post.

The lawyers representing the families, from the Legal Aid Justice Center (LAJC) and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan law firm, say the actions are targeted discrimination that disproportionately affects Latinos in the community. All the families involved in the lawsuit have lived in the park for at least two

People can threaten to sue all they want....winning is another thing altogether.

 

[daws101]

no proof he did.
next desperate speculation.

So the whole law suite is a figment of your little mind?

pull that out of your ass too?
there is no evidence that when he found out or knew all along that he did anything to stop it .
am I typing too fast for you?

Show me the evidence that he was a coconspirator.
But no matter how much you want to twist logic the fact remains he is being sued for following the law.

none needed, he already proved he was by not evicting them immediately.
he only followed the law because it was at this point to his advantage.
if the situation had been different this never would have happened .
the land lord as patriot shit won't cut it.

He tried to do something about it,read the article.

Really after how long I read that article and two more about it.
Not impressed.
Thanks for playing!

 

[daws101]

The answer would be yes if he / they had done that obviously they didn't.
The question is, does the landlords racketeering supercede the tenants illegal status.
you can stfu now.

Let's see now...the central government refuses to follow the law, by letting in millions of illegals and refusing to deport them, but this landlord is unlawful.

CRAZY!!!

False comparison! But you had to say something

I was not comparing.

If the central government refuses to follow the law, why should anyone else?

More flawed "logic".
So would you cut off your dick because everyone else did?

Everyone else is the government in your small mind.

Lol! Best you could do?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Sorry for my mistake ...and your apparent lack of information retention.
The article made it pretty clear the illegals moved in with legal renters.

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no jproof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

It says it in the article. Read it.

No it doesnt say it in the article. I read it twice. Show me one quote that says they were illegal aliens.

So whats the law suite about?

 

[daws101]

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no jproof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

It says it in the article. Read it.

No it doesnt say it in the article. I read it twice. Show me one quote that says they were illegal aliens.

So whats the law suite about?

Read the article.

 

[Asclepias]

If that were true you would have quoted it. Since you didnt I call bullshit.

So let me get this straight...you're saying he rented to illegals?
How does that jive with him trying to kick out the illegals?
And the article clearly states the illegals were living with legal immigrants.
So under these circumstances who do you think signed the lease agreement,the illegals who he's trying to get rid of or the legal residents?

.....take your time.

Nope. The OP made that claim. I still see no jproof they were illegal but you claim they were. If the article clearly states it then post it. If not I call bullshit.

It says it in the article. Read it.

No it doesnt say it in the article. I read it twice. Show me one quote that says they were illegal aliens.

So whats the law suite about?

Discrimination.

"The civil rights lawsuit filed by families living in Waples Mobile Home Park in Fairfax County, Va., claims it is discriminatory to require a social security number for residency.

Read more: Illegal Immigrants Sue After Landlord Demands Documentation For Housing [VIDEO]

 

[Howey]

Another, more honest take.

Undocumented Latinos and their families sue after evictions

 

[Howey]

I found a more credible article. Turns out the people were undocumented immigrants as opposed to illegal aliens as claimed in the OP.

http://thinkhttp://thinkprogress.or...5/3781605/waples-mobile-home-latino-families/

And as the link I just posted states, evicting these people is a violation of the law.

Gee. If only we had an attorney on here who represents slum lords.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

All private businesses should be free to refuse service to anyone they wish. Just like you can refuse people to enter your house.

Not if they want to serve the public. If they want to be a private club then i agree.

Wrong again. A private business is the same as a private club is the same as a private home. THINK, america-hater.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

when ShootSpeeders and DAWS enter a thread, it's time to abandon all hope that it will remain an intelligent thread. Bailing out....

HAHAHA. Looks like i gutted you again and now you're gonna go scuttling back to your wife. HAHA

 

[ShootSpeeders]

I found a more credible article. Turns out the people were undocumented immigrants as opposed to illegal aliens as claimed in the OP.

Whats the difference, you brainless burrhead.?

 

[Asclepias]

All private businesses should be free to refuse service to anyone they wish. Just like you can refuse people to enter your house.

Not if they want to serve the public. If they want to be a private club then i agree.

Wrong again. A private business is the same as a private club is the same as a private home. THINK, america-hater.

No blockhead. Private clubs are exempt from PA laws. I knew you were a retard but I thought even you knew this.