Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except that NAFTA was always an extremist rightwing dogma.
NAFTA was the brainchild of the Reagan/Bush Regimes and was mainly supported by CON$ervatives.NAFTA passed under a supporting Clinton regime in his first term before the GOP took congress in the midterms. NAFTA is and was horrible.
That's a load of horse shit!93 million Americans do not work. That is nearly a 1/3 of the TOTAL US population. That is the lowest labor participation rate since 1978. In 1978, there were 10 fold more stay at home mothers than now
There were 10.4 million stay at home moms in 2012, your BS would make 104 million in 1978. In the 1970s stay at home moms made up 49% of all mothers which would mean there were 212 million moms in the 1970s. Assuming all had only one child and you get a US population of just moms and children totaling a minimum of 424 million in 1978. Need I go on making a fool of you?
4 million baby boomers drop out of the workforce every year and our labor participation rate is dropping?
I can see why conservatives are so concerned
World poverty would increase by 10% within two years if we followed your destructive free market policies.LFP is very low, unemployment U6 is very very high, income is down. This is because liberal soviet intervention is failing yet again.
Do you know what the labor participation rate is?4 million baby boomers drop out of the workforce every year and our labor participation rate is dropping?
I can see why conservatives are so concerned
dear, if you retire you are not in the labor force so don't count . Do you understand?
Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time 62.7 Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low CNS News
93 million Americans do not work. That is nearly a 1/3 of the TOTAL US population. That is the lowest labor participation rate since 1978. In 1978, there were 10 fold more stay at home mothers than now and Jimmy "Limp Dick" Carter as presidente. Yet labor participation rate was similarly horrendously low.
We are lead to believe by the faux numbers and the librat media that the economy is peachy, yet the driving force for the so-called 5.5% unemployment number is the absolutely frightening labor participation rate.
So 93 million Americans don't work. Obama is made more don't work. If he could only get 100 million more to so-call leave the labor force he would have full employment numbers!
Talk to new grads and you hear, man I got $90K in student loan debt, yet there are no jobs to be had other than low paid unskilled service jobs!
The economy isn't good and no amount of librat propaganda can change the reality on the ground!
employed + unemployed/ total work force. Does the idiot liberal have any more questions??Do you know what the labor participation rate is?
Obviously not
Assumes facts not in evidence.Over-regulation is what is preventing the flood of on-shoring to kick off!
failed "free markets" dogma
NAFTA is and was horrible.
actually Nafta is free trade without which you would starve trying to make your car home and phone all by yourself.
Except that NAFTA was always an extremist rightwing dogma. Simply because Clinton was fooled into signing it doesn't alter who owns it and the fall out because of it.
So blaming Dems for failed GOP fiscal policies is disingenuous. Own your failures and try to learn from them.
Except that NAFTA was always an extremist rightwing dogma. Simply because Clinton was fooled into signing it doesn't alter who owns it and the fall out because of it.
NAFTA was a bipartisan legislation. It was passed in 1993 by a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate and signed off on by a Democratic president. 132 Republicans voted for it in the House and 102 Democrats. 30 Republicans voted for it in the Senate and 43 Democrats.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote
H.R. 3450 103rd North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- GovTrack.us
So blaming Dems for failed GOP fiscal policies is disingenuous. Own your failures and try to learn from them.
So pretending Dems played no role for their own failed economic policy is disingenuous. Own your failures and try to learn from them.
NAFTA is and was horrible.
actually Nafta is free trade without which you would starve trying to make your car home and phone all by yourself.
So before NAFTA we were all starving and didn't have a car, home, or phone?
I am not denying that the Dems played a role.
However their role was that of the duped.
The role of dupers was played by the GOP.
I am more than willing to own up to being duped by the GOP. Are you willing to own being part of the dupers?
Except that NAFTA was always an extremist rightwing dogma. Simply because Clinton was fooled into signing it doesn't alter who owns it and the fall out because of it.
NAFTA was a bipartisan legislation. It was passed in 1993 by a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate and signed off on by a Democratic president. 132 Republicans voted for it in the House and 102 Democrats. 30 Republicans voted for it in the Senate and 43 Democrats.
U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote
H.R. 3450 103rd North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- GovTrack.us
So blaming Dems for failed GOP fiscal policies is disingenuous. Own your failures and try to learn from them.
So pretending Dems played no role for their own failed economic policy is disingenuous. Own your failures and try to learn from them.
I am not denying that the Dems played a role. However their role was that of the duped. The role of dupers was played by the GOP. I am more than willing to own up to being duped by the GOP. Are you willing to own being part of the dupers?
NAFTA is and was horrible.
actually Nafta is free trade without which you would starve trying to make your car home and phone all by yourself.
So before NAFTA we were all starving and didn't have a car, home, or phone?
before NAFTA you drove a Ford that rusted in 4 years or Chevy whose engine broke down irreparably in 5 years.
