Zafira Cherry
Diamond Member
watch the rerunsAt least enough of it has. No doubt it ain't over yet. I just hope it doesn't spread to the Santa Monica Hills north of Malibu where they shot all those old movies. Lots of beautiful areas in there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
watch the rerunsAt least enough of it has. No doubt it ain't over yet. I just hope it doesn't spread to the Santa Monica Hills north of Malibu where they shot all those old movies. Lots of beautiful areas in there.
Just one.
Keep voting democrat you genius! KEEP VOTING DEMOCRAT!
You just keep pretending WANTS and FEELS are accomplishing anything.
like good gun legislation? thoughts & prayers is all that is offered up when ever people get turned into swiss cheese thanx to the NRA. that's not even considered mother nature, that's 100% man made.
1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
Anyone who wants people disarmed can't be trusted.
It is for the people who are dead or injured and their loved ones.
I'd feel worse for those who have lost everything were it not for the fact that they were told numerous times that this would happen and voted for this anyway.
Why ban ARs? They're just hunting rifles. Is it because they're black and scary?i have firearms in my own home davey. i am in favor of the 2nd amendment, within reason. & that includes banning ARs.
Why ban ARs? They're just hunting rifles. Is it because they're black and scary?
![]()
Ahhh. So you know nothing about ARs. You therefore rely on emotion-based talking points, same as all other irrational gun-haters.no, because they can turn people into bloody rags full of holes in mere seconds. high velocity bullets are not meant for hunting, unless perhaps wild boar.
just ask any sandy hook parent what they think about it.
The Founders disagree with you. I will go with their opinion.i have firearms in my own home davey. i am in favor of the 2nd amendment, within reason. & that includes banning ARs.
Oh, and a bit more reality for you:no, because they can turn people into bloody rags full of holes in mere seconds. high velocity bullets are not meant for hunting, unless perhaps wild boar.
just ask any sandy hook parent what they think about it.
So, in summary, you're full of shit.In 1950, the .222 Remington cartridge was developed for varmint hunting. It evolved into the .223 Remington round, which in turn became the basis of the 5.56 mm cartridge adopted by the military for use in the M16 and favored by many target competitors. Neither round is preferred by deer hunters, as most loads are too underpowered to harvest big game.
Maryland game regulations require that rifles used for deer hunting must use ammunition developing a muzzle energy of at least 1,200 foot pounds. A typical 5.56 with a normal 55 grain bullet generates 1,223 ft.-lbs. of muzzle energy. By contrast, a. 308 round with a 150-grain bullet fires with 2,648 ft.-lbs. of muzzle energy, over double that of the 5.56.
As is plain to see, the power of the .223/5.56 round isn't much to speak of compared to typical hunting rounds. It is so underpowered that the Armed Forces are replacing its 5.56 M16 and M4 rifles with a new 6.8 x 51 mm round (the XM7) which has muzzle energy of 2,267 ft-lbs with a 135 grain bullet.
You seem confused. Outside of your cult, these low IQ Trump attacks elevate one's status.
. The founders didn't say anything about ARs. You're having another episode, peepaw.The Founders disagree with you.
Isn't Indiana where all the Chicago residents go to get their weapons?. The founders didn't say anything about ARs. You're having another episode, peepaw.
Explain how it's NOT Democrats' fault.You seem confused. Outside of your cult, these low IQ Trump attacks elevate one's status.
The Founders didn't say anything about the internet, either, but here you are, yapping like you're important.. The founders didn't say anything about ARs. You're having another episode, peepaw.
You need to wake up and catch up. As you know, that was 60+ years ago, and we haven't done that in decades. Yes, we have subdivisions. I was born here in Florida and have lived here since 1954. From Tallahassee to Key West. Chicago was home for a few years after WW II.you mean like FLA with all the over development, & getting rid of wetlands that absorb the tides when hurricanes hit that state?
like that?
You're ignorant of the fact that both of those rifles take and fire the same ammunition.no, because they can turn people into bloody rags full of holes in mere seconds. high velocity bullets are not meant for hunting, unless perhaps wild boar.
just ask any sandydhook parent what they think about it.
How is it low to say, "They all brought it on themselves"?Not everyone in So Cal votes Democrat.
Plus there's more to it than that. A number of big fires in different places in recent years (not just in CA) showed signs that they weren't accidents, that foul play was involved, and that's what a lot of people have been talking about. So IF these fires are part of that same pattern, then it would've happened regardless.
And lastly, these fires affected a lot more than just rich celebs. There are plenty of people who don't vote Dem, or don't vote for the Duopoly at all, and what about all the innocents, like children and animals. It's pretty low to say "they all brought it on themselves" when a lot of souls are going through the worst nightmare they'll probably ever experience.
How is it low to say, "They all brought it on themselves"?
Who else is to blame? Did some other state vote for them?