Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Faun]

You're putting words in my mouth, you blithering fetishized leftist.

You're lying again. Of course you said I want evidence suppressed...

And before we get to the part where Faun says "but those videos can't be admitted as evidence! Rittenhouse is guilty!!1!11!!!"

​

 

[Faun]

You're doing this shit on purpose, aren't you?

Making an utter fool of you? Absofuckinglutely.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You're lying again. Of course you said I want evidence suppressed...

Quote me, without selectively editing it.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Making an utter fool of you? Absofuckinglutely.

You're making a fool of yourself Faun.

Had I been so utterly defeated by you, I would not have been in this thread kicking your backside since Thursday afternoon.

 

[BackAgain]

LOLOL

Last time I'm going to repeat this. The defense got the answer they wanted by asking a question about something that didn't happen. At no point did Rosenbaum "turn" to get shot in the back. So it's meaningless that the witness agreed he did not turn and get shot in the back.

Furthermore, not even the prosecution is asserting Rittenhouse was behind Rosenbaum when he shot him in the back. So yet again, we find you're arguing with voices in your head and not against what anyone is saying.


Again, last time I repeat this... I never said Rosenbaum was armed when Rittenhousepointed his gun at him. I challenged you to quote me but regrettably, it seems you'd rather repeat your lie than quote me saying what you're claiming I said. Especially since you can't quote me because I never said that.

Let’s break it down — since you are so clearly in whining puss mode. Ready?

Based on the trial evidence, which of the injured or killed individuals were armed when shot by Rittenhouse?

Let us put the question about a “gun” aside (except for rhe defendant’s rifle, naturally).

If you are in an area where rioting has been going on and is still going on, and you are pursued by someone in an angry manner, IS IT your claim that by pointing a rifle at or in the direction of your pursuer, you have “provoked” the encounter In such a way as to negate a legal claim of self-defense?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Based on the trial evidence, which of the injured or killed individuals were armed when shot by Rittenhouse?

Grosskreutz.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I'm gonna go watch some football. I'll leave Faun to climb the padded walls by himself.

 

[TemplarKormac]

"(Lake County, IL) An extensive investigation was conducted by the Antioch Police Department regarding the gun used in a shooting in Kenosha on Aug. 28. The Lake County State's Attorney's Office has reviewed that investigation to determine if any crimes were committed in Lake County, Illinois.

To that end, the investigation revealed the gun used in the Kenosha shooting was purchased, stored and used in Wisconsin. Additionally, there is no evidence the gun was ever physically possessed by Kyle Rittenhouse in Illinois."

Update on Kyle Rittenhouse situation in Illinois

content.govdelivery.com

 

[eddiew37]

I'm gonna go watch some football. I'll leave Faun to climb the padded walls by himself.

You leave Like a dog with its tail between it's legs

 

[BackAgain]

Grosskreutz.

Thanks. I believe I was conflating different parts of the entire incident.

 

[Esdraelon]

Rittenhouse had no business there anyway. He didn't even live in the state yet alone the city.

None of which makes him guilty of murder or even manslaughter. He did everything he could to escape. Had he gone there to stir the pot and kill anyone, he wouldn't have been running away. Deal with it... he had EVERY RIGHT to be there.

 

[lantern2814]

Coming from a lying racist republican Defending a murderer who carried an AR 15

You’re going to stroke out when Rittenhouse walks.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You leave Like a dog with its tail between it's legs

You waited almost an hour to come back with that.

Funny.

Back to football.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Of course you are. Want proof...?

Quote me saying, or even intimidating, videos should be suppressed....

Of course. Given where you stand on this case, naturally you wouldn't want any exonerating evidence submitted.

Your behavior throughout this entire thread has suggested you want Rittenhouse to be guilty regardless of the evidence. You've repeatedly ignored refuting evidence posted by me and other posters.

There's always a pattern of behavior with people like you. Yours was easy to read.

 

[emilynghiem]

The problem was there was no agreed process for safety enforcement, normally managed by police, and no way to tell who was acting as trained security or medical emergency help.

The men thought the others were there to instigate violence. When people see a lone person, carrying an automatic weapon, they are considitioned to respond to an Active Shooter threat.

Unfornunately all the men thought the other was there to incite violence, and they all were acting to stop such threat.
Seeing Rittenhouse as an Active Shooter threat also explains why 2 of the 3 men acted to isolate or disarm that threat. Rittenhouse also saw them as the criminal attackers and tried to stop them.

The fear was mutual where each saw the others as the dangerous threat to subdue.

The problem is negligence, in not establishing a uniform consistent safety enforcement process, training and identification, where all protest participants receive and agree to the same standards of security, and process as police are required to follow, where they identify themselves and instruct the person they are apprehending with safe steps to follow.

None of this would happen if citizens and police meet in advance to setup training and agreement to follow the same policies.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Seeing Rittenhouse as an Active Shooter threat...

UInder no meaningful definition of the term was Rittenhouse an active shooter

also explains why 2 of the 3 men acted to isolate or disarm that threat.

In WI you are required to retreat from a threat; you are only legally to use force if you have exhausted all avenues of retreat.
And so, even if, laughably, that was their intent, it was illegal for them to do so.

The fear was mutual where each saw the others as the dangerous threat to subdue.

Even if true, only Rittemhouse exercised his duty to retreat.

 

[Foolardi]

This is true, undoubtedly, but the fact is that it's true for BOTH SIDES. A LOT of stances on this board alone would do a full reverse.

There are No Both Sides to any humane debate.Today's Left are a pack of
Unamerican Liars.Biden can't open his senile mouth w/o lying like a junkyard
dog trained to talk.As Dennis Prager proves 5 days each week on his Talk Radio
program ... The Left does Not Value Truth.
The Right in this Country,by and large does.
The proof.Any Big city in America run by Liberal/Left Mayors has gone
the route of the Shits.In practically every circumstance.At least in the Northern
Corridor.
Now Biden has a chance to Make most cities in America do the same.
So this is surely Not any example of " Both Sides ".
Just One side.The side out to Destroy America from the inside out.We are
virtually watching it every week now.Getting worse and worse.
I think the Left and the Democrats are working on a plan to somehow
stall or cancel temporally next years Midterm Elections.
Do Not Put anything past them.They are Evil.Any American who believes in
Defunding Police Departments or eliminating our Police is ...
Evil

 

[Cecilie1200]

You leave Like a dog with its tail between it's legs

I realize you have no practical experience of this, but some people have actual lives and interests beyond sitting on the Internet. So much for your self-flattering delusion that the world - or anything, really - is all about your laughable attempts to debate.

 

[Cecilie1200]

UInder no meaningful definition of the term was Rittenhouse an active shooter

In WI you are required to retreat from a threat; you are only legally to use force if you have exhausted all avenues of retreat.
And so, even if, laughably, that was their intent, it was illegal for them to do so.

Even if true, only Rittemhouse exercised his duty to retreat.

And let us not forget that if the authorities who are charged with preserving public safety had done their jobs and contained the riots in the first place, none of this would have happened.

Did anyone hear that the governor of Wisconsin has put 500 National Guard troops on standby in case of riots when the verdict is delivered? Where the fuck was this response from the douchebag earlier?

 

[eddiew37]

I realize you have no practical experience of this, but some people have actual lives and interests beyond sitting on the Internet. So much for your self-flattering delusion that the world - or anything, really - is all about your laughable attempts to debate.

And you with over 52000 messages has a life to lead?? lol lol