Kyle Rittenhouse: Teen's homicide trial for Kenosha shootings opens with jury selection

He was an active shooter. Folks had a right to disarm him.


They weren't "folks", they were rioters, remember asshat, when you are the one committing the crime, you can't claim stand your ground.

You Dumbfuck.
 
Kyle should not even be accused. Our nice
Communist states don't like that, and they are very good at rigging Juries, most so called Americans are too stupid to excercize their right to negate rigged and unlawful court cases.
I was on a federal grand jury, and the jurors did not examine the evidence using even a hint of critical examination. I ended up calling them to be the real criminals. They even said that their job was to indict as quick as possible. They were so stupid!
T
 
Open carry is legal in Wisconsin...and since Kyle was in the presence of other adults the statutes are fulfilled legally in every sense of the law.
Not for a 17 year old, moron. Unless he was hunting or in a course of instruction, it's illegal for a 17 year old to carry.
 
They weren't "folks", they were rioters, remember asshat, when you are the one committing the crime, you can't claim stand your ground.

You Dumbfuck.
Post your evidence that Huber and Grosskreutz were rioting....
 
More than you, and watching the opening arguments you clowns are toast.
LOLOL

"There's no such thing as an opening argument. It's opening statement. The argument is for the end and that's when they're going to make their pleas to you to return verdicts in accordance with their beliefs."

Yet again, dumbfuck, you demonstrate abject ignorance of this case.
 
Ummm, the PROSECUTION admitted they were, you buffoon.
I ask for you to post proof and you post your ignorant opinion.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
LOLOL

"There's no such thing as an opening argument. It's opening statement. The argument is for the end and that's when they're going to make their pleas to you to return verdicts in accordance with their beliefs."

Yet again, dumbfuck, you demonstrate abject ignorance of this case.




Oooh, you are so sooper dooper. I watched the ADA make the defense's case.

Enjoy the suck.
 
I ask for you to post proof and you post your ignorant opinion.
icon_rolleyes.gif



Not my opinion. The prosecution tried to prevent the defense from calling them rioters.

The JUDGE refused, accurately saying they WERE rioting.

Once again...YOU LOSE.

Dumbshit.
 
Oooh, you are so sooper dooper. I watched the ADA make the defense's case.

Enjoy the suck.
LOL

I quoted the Judge Schroeder.

You quote your own dumbass self -- and you're a moron.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Not my opinion. The prosecution tried to prevent the defense from calling them rioters.

The JUDGE refused, accurately saying they WERE rioting.

Once again...YOU LOSE.

Dumbshit.
"The prosecution tried to prevent the defense"

LOL

Dumbfuck, you said the prosecution called them rioters. Now you say they don't want to call them rioters.

You're such a ******* retard, you're now arguing with yourself. And still, you have no evidence they were rioting.
 
"The prosecution tried to prevent the defense"

LOL

Dumbfuck, you said the prosecution called them rioters. Now you say they don't want to call them rioters.

You're such a ******* retard, you're now arguing with yourself. And still, you have no evidence they were rioting.
THE PROSECUTION SAID "WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT RIOTING. WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT ARSON."

THEN, THE JUDGE INTERUPTS THE COMMUNIST, POLITICALLY MOTIVATED PROSECUTOR AND SAYS "I CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT I AM HEARING."

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT, YOU ******* CUUUUNT!
 
15th post
THE PROSECUTION SAID "WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT RIOTING. WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT ARSON."

THEN, THE JUDGE INTERUPTS THE COMMUNIST, POLITICALLY MOTIVATED PROSECUTOR AND SAYS "I CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT I AM HEARING."

GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT, YOU ******* CUUUUNT!
Untitled.png

Try harder, booyo. You're hyperventilating and failing.
 
Then post evidence. You morons are making claims but not posting any evidence.

Prosecutor: "We're only talking about rioting. We're only talking about arson."

Judge: "Listen to what you're saying."
 
Jaywalking is illegal-----perhaps you can get the kid for jaywalking as well as he ran from the pedo and other violent criminals. He was 17---its so what that he had gun, he used the gun far better than most adult men.
Your disdain for the law is noted...
 
"The prosecution tried to prevent the defense"

LOL

Dumbfuck, you said the prosecution called them rioters. Now you say they don't want to call them rioters.

You're such a ******* retard, you're now arguing with yourself. And still, you have no evidence they were rioting.



God you're an idiot. The prosecution tried to prevent the defense from calling the rioters, rioters. They wanted them to only be called victims.

Dumbass.
 
Back
Top Bottom