Kyle Rittenhouse sued by estate of Joseph Rosenbaum

[Ghost of a Rider]

Richie just makes it up as he goes along.

Apparently so. But he is by far not the only one to employ this tactic. This is a common theme among those who hate Rittenhouse; conflate the incident so that Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum over the dumpster fire.

 

[Leo123]

Apparently so. But he is by far not the only one to employ this tactic. This is a common theme among those who hate Rittenhouse; conflate the incident so that Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum over the dumpster fire.

Rosenbaum was a 'dumpster fire' all by himself.

 

[TheYellowKing]

Rittenhouse did know that before he broke curfew and killed the man.

So we should all just let mental patients have their way with us first just to be sure LOL ok pal

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Rittenhouse trial was total BULLSHIT. The judge was obviously biased in his favor.

The incident should have been broken into 4 separate incidents:

Rittenhouse instigated the first confrontation and threatened the first victim. Rittenhouse should not have had a gun in the first place. So he was guilty of illegal gun possession and threatening a person with a gun.

The second incident was when Rittenhouse ran away from the first victim, and the first victim pursued him (wow, can you get any stupider!). Rittenhouse was clearly trying his best to disengage the confrontation. The first shooting was clearly an act of self defense.

The second shooting was also an act of self defense. The second victim attacked him with a skateboard and was trying to bust his skull open.

The third person he shot was obviously trying to reason with him an calm him down. He never should have shot the third person. He was guilty on that one.

Moral of the story: KEEP GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS OF CHILDREN!!!

quite wrong.

Rittenhouse instigated none of it.

haviung a gun in and of itself is not threatening anyone.
The third victim was NOT trying to reason with hinm the third victim was in fact pointing a weapon directly at him .

The trial was fair with no evidence of bias

 

[Billo_Really]

unless you are Kyle.

Kyle was the aggressor.

 

[Billo_Really]

Irrelevant. You claimed that by simple virtue of his bringing a gun to the protest that he went there with the express intention of shooting someone. If that's true then it's also true of Grosskreutz and everybody else who went there armed.

You should know (if you don't know already) that Grosskreutz has a criminal record, two arrests of which were firearm related.

He has been arrested twice for possessing a firearm while intoxicated. In addition to these he has been arrested for and/or convicted of domestic abuse, prowling, trespass, two DUIs and felony burglary.

It's ironic that for all the vitriol and demonization of Rittenhouse for bringing a gun to the protest, Grosskreutz was the one who actually violated firearm regulations. Not only did he have the two arrests for firearm possession while intoxicated as noted above, his conceal carry permit was expired the night of the shooting so he's the one who was illegally armed.

That is not what I am saying. Of all the people that brought arms to the protest, only Rittenhouse was there to kill! Why? Because he did!

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

That is not what I am saying. Of all the people that brought arms to the protest, only Rittenhouse was there to kill! Why? Because he did!

You're really reaching here. I probably don't need to tell you how flawed your logic is.

Let me ask you a question: Was Rittenhouse attacked?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Kyle was the aggressor.

No, he was not.

 

[Auld Phart]

Kyle was the aggressor.

Kyle attacked no one. he responded to people attacking him.

 

[Auld Phart]

That is not what I am saying. Of all the people that brought arms to the protest, only Rittenhouse was there to kill! Why? Because he did!

Why?

because he was attacked

 

[beagle9]

I'm saying in this case the rifle was the escalation.

The riot was the escalator, not the defenders of the communities. Funny how you miss that little fact.

 

[beagle9]

Well, then the answer is, 'no'.

Your point ? Oh yeah, you have none.

 

[beagle9]

That is not what I am saying. Of all the people that brought arms to the protest, only Rittenhouse was there to kill! Why? Because he did!

He was forced too.

 

[Billo_Really]

You're really reaching here. I probably don't need to tell you how flawed your logic is.

Let me ask you a question: Was Rittenhouse attacked?

Before, or after, he did some attacking himself?

 

[Billo_Really]

No, he was not.

I disagree. Introducing deadly force is aggression!

 

[Billo_Really]

Kyle attacked no one. he responded to people attacking him.

He was running around with a rifle looking for people to shoot. Not that much different than George Zimmerman. If these guys are your heroes, then you are bat-shit crazy!

 

[Billo_Really]

The riot was the escalator, not the defenders of the communities. Funny how you miss that little fact.

It wasn't even his fucking community!

 

[Billo_Really]

Your point ? Oh yeah, you have none.

My point is...fuck the 2nd Amendment! Fuck it in your ass! You gun guys are sick in the head and you are less than 10% of society!

 

[Billo_Really]

He was forced too.

Nah, he wanted to!

 

[Flash]

Kyle was the aggressor.

You are a fucking idiot.

Are you still at this?

You stupid hate filled Moon Bats are obsessed with Kyle, aren't you?

Get a life loser!