EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 81,988
- 57,233
- 2,645
It is Rittenhouse that will file extensive civil cases. Remember when communist democrats fought so hard to be able to sue a sitting president. Yeah. Me too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree there is no honest case against him. However, don't put it past the liberal Democrats to find some people and pay them to lie about what happened. They have no scruples and don't care about the truth.There will be no civil cases filed against Rittenhouse. There is simply no cause of action.
It doesn't matter. There is just no civil case possible against Rittenhouse. Nor is federal prosecution possible. All that remains is his defamation case and he has plenty of defendants.I agree there is no honest case against him. However, don't put it past the liberal Democrats to find some people and pay them to lie about what happened. They have no scruples and don't care about the truth.
You are naive. Obviously, you are not aware of how many people lie under oath in court.It doesn't matter. There is just no civil case possible against Rittenhouse. Nor is federal prosecution possible. All that remains is his defamation case and he has plenty of defendants.
I realize that. But sometimes idiots still file suits trying to cash in.Self Defense is not wrongful death. He was acquitted.
I don't care how they lie. There is no civil case possible against Kyle Rittenhouse. That must be why no one has filed one.You are naive. Obviously, you are not aware of how many people lie under oath in court.
That article has so many untruths and outright lies in it’s obviously a political hit piece. The “unidentified girl“ is Rittenhouse’s sister and the girl Rittenhouse hit was a bully attacking her. It’s pretty obvious Kyle did nothing wrong because despite pending murder charges, no charges were filed against him over the incident."...we can’t say with certainty that this isn’t another person who resembles the 17-year-old accused of shooting and killing two people at a protest."
Did Kyle Rittenhouse Punch a Woman in This Video?
A video of a fight in Kenosha, Wisconsin, supposedly shows the 17-year-old accused of killing two people at a protest assaulting a woman.www.snopes.com
Before you file a lawsuit, there is usually months of preparation done. You need depositions of witnesses and actual research to locate the defendant and have him served with a summons. Preparation of the Summons and Complaint takes several days.I don't care how they lie. There is no civil case possible against Kyle Rittenhouse. That must be why no one has filed one.
If the new left had any guts at all, they'd at leastjillian You are correct, Kyle is very lucky there was indisputable video evidence of exactly what happened. Otherwise he certainly would have been railroaded into prison by the New Woke Order.
There will be no civil cases filed against Rittenhouse. There is simply no cause of action.
We know your opinion now Joy.Sure there is. Was his negligence the cause of the deaths of two people. It's not even a criminal issue, people are found negligent all the time.
You keep thinking negligence when there was no negligence. All three men were shot as intentional acts. No one has said that the shootings were accidental. What negligence can you see? He did not handle his weapon in such a careless manner as to be the proximate cause of the deaths of two men? The answer has to be no. Both men were shot and killed as the result of deliberative acts. This has been established.Sure there is. Was his negligence the cause of the deaths of two people. It's not even a criminal issue, people are found negligent all the time.
You keep thinking negligence when there was no negligence. All three men were shot as intentional acts. No one has said that the shootings were accidental. What negligence can you see? He did not handle his weapon in such a careless manner as to be the proximate cause of the deaths of two men? The answer has to be no. Both men were shot and killed as the result of deliberative acts. This has been established.
Um, slow down and pay attention to what you're writing.
He didn't get a quarter million from WaPo. He didn't even sue them for that. He sued them for $250 million, but there was a settlement. So, he didn't get $250 million from WaPo, either...
Lefties are making Kyle RICH!What makes you believe Sandmann got $800 million?
Once again, OJ claimed he NEVER killed anyone. The state did not meet its burden in the criminal case. Kyle Rittenhouse never denied killing these men. He admitted that he intended to and did kill them. Rittenhouse did not negligently cross state lines. He intended to cross state lines that morning when he went to work. Kenosha will certainly not be a codefendant in your non existent case because it did not accidentally or negligently fail to enforce curfew laws. Since you know, the dead guys were in violation of the curfew also. There is simply no negligence anywhere in this tale of woe. Sorry. Try something else.Once again, OJ was found innocent of two murders but held liable in two deaths... this isn't rocket science, dummy.
His negligence would be in crossing state lines to participate in a riot with a weapon he wasn't trained or qualified to have. Compounding it will be that his co-defendent, the City of Kenosha, will almost certainly settle the case, admitting it was negligent in not running him off the street when he was in violation of curfew.