Kraughthammer on Obama--he nailed it

[Coyote]

I prefer calling him Pubic. But Pubeless is probably more accurate. Rumor has it he is un-anatomically correct, like a Barbie doll...no hair there, or anything else.

Would that be Pubic Infinitesimal?

 

[Coyote]

Calling him pubeless? What are you 16? grow up

Oh come on...you're taking Pube's words and the responses way too seriously...and, you seem to have a tad bit of a reading comprehension problem....did you not notice this bit of "maturity" in Pube's post? [/quote]

Readin'? Oh that's a GREAT Idea!

Here's some readin' for ya... it'll let ya peer into the future of your socialist society... As to the Anarcho-drivel... forget about it, it's an absurdity sought only by those prone to succumbing to such absurd illusions.

This is the interview of the most prolific writer of the realities of Socialism... distinct from the delusional bullshit common to the academics theorists touted by you, Jwhatshername and the Aggrevated-Prostate.

I think it's all quite funny

 

[Coloradomtnman]

I hope you keep filling these message boards with...quick and...smart little jabs like calling people names and such. Is it possible for you to think about anybody else but yourself or are you one those guys who's never wrong and rants on about how important your opinon is and its free speech so I can say what I want.

Sorry to get your hopes up, but...?

Well, it's possible! But the reality is the only people I call names on this board are Pubelickus, and only because its the USMB trend. Everyone makes fun of his name because it and he beg for it. Other than that, you'll have to go through and read my posts and decide for yourself whether I think about anyone else, whether I never think I'm wrong, or if I rant on about how important my opinion is...etc.

Until then, I just want to thank you for letting me know how superior in personal behavior you are, and I will hold you up as a shining idol of appropriate PC-ness. If ever I need to receive an upbraiding because I didn't get a hall pass, I mean, because I stepped over the boundaries of proper behavior into the realm inappropriate conduct and immaturity, I'll come to you. Thanks again Mr. Proper Behavior Code Enforcer!

 

[MaggieMae]

Dr. Charles Krauthammer is spot on.

Obama has to be stopped at all costs.

Knock yourself out, but I'd be careful about the open threats or you might hear a knock at your door by men in black.

ROFLMNAO...

OH GOD! That's precious...

They're ALREADY delcaring any contest of the BOY King to tantamount to a THREAT against His Asshol-anus...

Screw the big eared Marxist FUCK and the herd of fools he rode in on...

Jeezus, lighten up skinhead.

 

[MaggieMae]

I hope you keep filling these message boards with...quick and...smart little jabs like calling people names and such. Is it possible for you to think about anybody else but yourself or are you one those guys who's never wrong and rants on about how important your opinon is and its free speech so I can say what I want.

Sorry to get your hopes up, but...?

Well, it's possible! But the reality is the only people I call names on this board are Pubelickus, and only because its the USMB trend. Everyone makes fun of his name because it and he beg for it. Other than that, you'll have to go through and read my posts and decide for yourself whether I think about anyone else, whether I never think I'm wrong, or if I rant on about how important my opinion is...etc.

Until then, I just want to thank you for letting me know how superior in personal behavior you are, and I will hold you up as a shining idol of appropriate PC-ness. If ever I need to receive an upbraiding because I didn't get a hall pass, I mean, because I stepped over the boundaries of proper behavior into the realm inappropriate conduct and immaturity, I'll come to you. Thanks again Mr. Proper Behavior Code Enforcer!

Well...maybe Kent (a newby) is trying to keep it clean. He apparently hasn't met Elvis yet.


I liked your take on the elitist Latin screen name PI chose. What's the word for "bloviating asshole" in Latin?

 

[code1211]

Dr. Charles Krauthammer is spot on.

Obama has to be stopped at all costs.

Knock yourself out, but I'd be careful about the open threats or you might hear a knock at your door by men in black.

That may not be far wrong. The problem with those that have found the Truth with a capital T is that they feel compelled to make all accept it.

 

[code1211]

The first few sections sounded reasonable....with the potential for thought but then it rapidly disintegrated into something resembling ideological talking points and fear mongering. How disappointing for a man who is supposed to be an intellectual. To sum it up succinctly, he is saying Obama's striving to be the Evil Overlord of the World.

That's not the way I read it. So far, Obama has engineered giving billions to the the UAW and nationalizing the auto industry and the banking industry. He wants to destroy the energy business, raise taxes on everybody on everything through the Cap and Trade Swindle and nationalize the healthcare industry.

How big a chunk of the economy is Auto, energy, healthcare and finance? I'll go out on a limb and say that there is not one person in the USA does not depend on one or all of these industries on a daily basis.

Quite soon, in Obama's Utopia, we will enjoy the customer service that is only available from government union employees who cannot be fired for cause and who compete for the highest service honor, the coveted "Pillar of Salt Award".

Can a "Single Payer" produce more efficient results than a competitive market place? If your answer is yes, compare the cost of the benefits for the average US Government employee to the average private industry employee.

If we dissolve the energy business of the USA and lose all of those jobs, what is the plan to replace those jobs?

Platitudes are one thing. A well defined plan with a well understood and well examined process and projected outcome are completely different. The stern on our little Titanic is starting to rise.

Are you better off now than you were 6 months ago?

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Where was this dipshit when Reagan / Bush Jr were destroying the middle class and feeding the pockets of the wealthy and corporations?

OpEdNews » Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

I used to catch him on an early morning round table on FOX either Saturday or Sunday several years ago where there were three or four regular commentators from both the liberal and conservative non-mainstream media. Krauthammer was one, I think Fred Barnes was another, the woman often seen on O'Reilly Factor now from American University (Ann something), and another one from Media Matters. It was always a good discussion, and Krauthammer often got smacked down (in a civil manner of course). He does much better pontificating solo. That program doesn't exist anymore. Surprise surprise. We're treated instead to The Beltway Boys, Morton Kondracke and Fred Barnes, gleefully nodding in agreement with each other.

ROFLMNAO... 'Krauthammer got smacked down...' Oh GOD That's precious... It's so hilarious how two people can come away with two wholly distinct perceptions of the same thing. I've watched Fox News Sunday from the beginning and doubt I've missed 3 shows since its debut... and never witnessed ANY discussion where anyone on that panel even approached a sustainable contest of Krauthammer's position, let alone advanced a polite smack-down... what this idiot is defining as a 'smack-down' is the simple advancement of a countering point of view of that Krauthammer offered and as that point of view compliments this idiots point of view, she erroneously feels that it serves as such.

Of course this idiots never posted any position in my presence which wasn't beat like a red headed step child and throughly discredited and refuted...

And given Krauthammer is better at it than I am, it's unlikely that anything offered up by a leftist would be sustained, in his presence. Simple time constraints prevent a rebuttal, thus where a leftist gets the last word, they feel they've carried the day.

DUMBASS!

 

[jillian]

he gave them shit too

No... he didn't... not until almost 8 years passed and Bush destroyed everything he touched....

So which is it? No he didn't or after 8 years he did....

I guess he thinks that it's only taken Obama 5 months to destroy as much as Bush did in 8 years...

Don't you ever get tired of lying?

 

[MaggieMae]

Where was this dipshit when Reagan / Bush Jr were destroying the middle class and feeding the pockets of the wealthy and corporations?

OpEdNews » Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

I used to catch him on an early morning round table on FOX either Saturday or Sunday several years ago where there were three or four regular commentators from both the liberal and conservative non-mainstream media. Krauthammer was one, I think Fred Barnes was another, the woman often seen on O'Reilly Factor now from American University (Ann something), and another one from Media Matters. It was always a good discussion, and Krauthammer often got smacked down (in a civil manner of course). He does much better pontificating solo. That program doesn't exist anymore. Surprise surprise. We're treated instead to The Beltway Boys, Morton Kondracke and Fred Barnes, gleefully nodding in agreement with each other.

ROFLMNAO... 'Krauthammer got smacked down...' Oh GOD That's precious... It's so hilarious how two people can come away with two wholly distinct perceptions of the same thing. I've watched Fox News Sunday from the beginning and doubt I've missed 3 shows since its debut... and never witnessed ANY discussion where anyone on that panel even approached a sustainable contest of Krauthammer's position, let alone advanced a polite smack-down... what this idiot is defining as a 'smack-down' is the simple advancement of a countering point of view of that Krauthammer offered and as that point of view compliments this idiots point of view, she erroneously feels that it serves as such.

Of course this idiots never posted any position in my presence which wasn't beat like a red headed step child and throughly discredited and refuted...

And given Krauthammer is better at it than I am, it's unlikely that anything offered up by a leftist would be sustained, in his presence. Simple time constraints prevent a rebuttal, thus where a leftist gets the last word, they feel they've carried the day.

DUMBASS!

Like yourself much? There's nobody more disrespected than a bloviating egotistical braggadocio.

And btw, I wasn't talking about "Fox News Sunday." The show I remember well came on at least an hour before that. Must be you were still yelling at your mother to fix your breakfast.

 

[crpravens]

where was this dipshit when reagan / bush jr were destroying the middle class and feeding the pockets of the wealthy and corporations?

opednews » ronald reagan: Worst president ever?

he gave them shit too

no... He didn't... Not until almost 8 years passed and bush destroyed everything he touched....

bs

 

[Gunny]

This guy won a Pulitzer? Sure diminishes that prize, his essay is nothing but tired cliches.

Your response resembles your accusation more than Krauthammer's speech does. Nothing of substance to respond with, so you have to toss out a lame insult instead. But then, there is NOTHING of substance to rebut reality with.

 

[Gunny]

o who reads the colored fonts? ravi...did you really read it? come on be honest....i just skip right by colored font.

 

[Gunny]

Where was this dipshit when Reagan / Bush Jr were destroying the middle class and feeding the pockets of the wealthy and corporations?

OpEdNews » Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

Typical leftist response. Attack with some crap rather than address the post itself. The middle class has been toolin' right along until now. We'll be lucky to survive this administration at the rate its going.

 

[Gunny]

Where was this dipshit when Reagan / Bush Jr were destroying the middle class and feeding the pockets of the wealthy and corporations?

OpEdNews » Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

he gave them shit too

No... he didn't... not until almost 8 years passed and Bush destroyed everything he touched....

*yawn*

Lame, as usual. Bush didn't destroy anything you would care about. What a broken record.

 

[KittenKoder]

Here is the only problem I see, a majority of people voted for Obama and just getting him our of office will simply have him replaced by another of the same type. Let him stay in, let people see his policies in effect, once they see those effects we can hope that more will see the light and no vote for someone like him again. That's the only thing we can hope for at this point, unless people want to seriously get rid of Democracy.

 

[Gunny]

So which is it? No he didn't or after 8 years he did....

I guess he thinks that it's only taken Obama 5 months to destroy as much as Bush did in 8 years...

I dont see how's its fair to the President and what he's undone or has done in just 5 months. The wheels of gvernment dont move that fast, no matter who the President is, therefore making judgements about whats happened or hasn't happened is not really fair.
On the same note, its equally unfair to say "the liberals did it to Bush" or the "the Libs blame everything on Bush"...he was a lame duck and was widely criticized by not only liberals but quite a few republicans.[/QUOTE]

Oh BS. The left was holding Bush responsible from Day 1. Y'all have worn this line out. Obama has stuck his nose in more places he has no business in 5 months than Bush did in 8 years.

Or have you missed the part where he has just fucked us on energy, owns two auto corporations and an insurance corporation and given the Fed the power to seize any business it deems "vital to the US economy"?

He's basically trying to make all of us dependent on the government for everything. That's called control, just in case you missed that class.

And yeah, it IS fair to say the left did it to Bush. Hold your own idiot to the same standard you hold the other guy's idiot to. I realize that concept is a bit too much for a left to grasp, but at least give it a shot.

 

[Gunny]

No... he didn't... not until almost 8 years passed and Bush destroyed everything he touched....

So which is it? No he didn't or after 8 years he did....

I guess he thinks that it's only taken Obama 5 months to destroy as much as Bush did in 8 years...

Don't you ever get tired of lying?

Don't you ever get tired of calling people liars when you cannot prove they are lying? Using your standard, YOU are a liar on just about every topic. But then we really know you're just an ignorant leftwing sheep that follows the herd and bleets the bleet.

 

[Gunny]

Here is the only problem I see, a majority of people voted for Obama and just getting him our of office will simply have him replaced by another of the same type. Let him stay in, let people see his policies in effect, once they see those effects we can hope that more will see the light and no vote for someone like him again. That's the only thing we can hope for at this point, unless people want to seriously get rid of Democracy.

I disagree. Democracy IS the people. It isn't getting rid of democracy to realize a colossal screw-up and get rid of it -- it's EXERCISING democracy.

What you mean is it would be getting rid of the good old boy network that keeps two political parties in power that don't represent us in the slightest. Congresspersons can be recalled and Presidents can be impeached.

The problem with that idea is the left won't admit this guy's a screw-up even when they can't defend him. I laugh my ass off at the left. What a joke. The only thing that could make Bush look good is someone FAR worse and we are THERE.

 

[KittenKoder]

Here is the only problem I see, a majority of people voted for Obama and just getting him our of office will simply have him replaced by another of the same type. Let him stay in, let people see his policies in effect, once they see those effects we can hope that more will see the light and no vote for someone like him again. That's the only thing we can hope for at this point, unless people want to seriously get rid of Democracy.

I disagree. Democracy IS the people. It isn't getting rid of democracy to realize a colossal screw-up and get rid of it -- it's EXERCISING democracy.

What you mean is it would be getting rid of the good old boy network that keeps two political parties in power that don't represent us in the slightest. Congresspersons can be recalled and Presidents can be impeached.

The problem with that idea is the left won't admit this guy's a screw-up even when they can't defend him. I laugh my ass off at the left. What a joke. The only thing that could make Bush look good is someone FAR worse and we are THERE.

I agree with the last part, and the part I bolded is a great idea, but as I said, too few realize it yet, they, as you say, support Obama blindly still. We don't need them all to realize how much of an idiot he is, just enough to swing the majority to "something else".