Kobe Bryant refuses to support trayvon martin. Liberals crucify him

[dr.d]

Sigh...I really don't think that Anything was "proven" in that case...other than defense attny. O'Mara being effective in raising jurors' fears and biases .
..I watched the entire trial...and frankly, found that the way Treyvon's friend (who heard him say "get off me"before the phone died) and the heavily accented forensic examiners were treated ...highly prejudicial. Most of the time it felt like Martin was on trial rather than Zimmerman.
What IS actually naive is Depending on a fictitious video, O'mara's dramatics, and speculating "who started it", " who was on top" at any given moment and the perp's own account ...as justifications for the verdict.
By the bye...us libs did not raise this issue...I for one am simply responding to the sad effort to present Kobe's opinion as somehow cementing the validity of that verdict...Which at least one of the jurors regrets.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

With all due respect, Doc...Zimmerman got the living tar beat out of him by your "child"...Trayvon Martin is dead today because he decided that violence was the proper response to someone challenging his right to be walking through that neighborhood. All he needed to do was tell George Zimmerman who he was and who he was visiting. Zimmerman was following Martin that night because Zimmerman didn't think the teenager belonged where he was. The real tragedy is someone lost their life because they chose to use their fists rather than simply talk to the person they were having an issue with. THAT is the lesson that should be learned from what happened that night!

Well...first of all Z never challenged Trayvon....never even spoke to him until Trayvon accosted him.

But you are correct in that it was Trayvon who chose violence and thus reaped his just reward.

Trayvon was not 'visiting' anyone in that complex,supposedly he just cut through there on his way home, though it was a dark and rainy night and he was lingering there for some reason. The time line brought out in the trial proved that trayvon had more than enough time to have been home before the incident happend....so he was lollygagging about on a dark and rainy night---why???? There are several possibilities...though it will never be known for sure. One very likely reason being that he was casing the neighborhood for a burglary. He had been previously caught with a burglary tool and in possession of stolen property and that neighborhood had been plagued by break-ins.

It is very clear that Trayvon for whatever reason decided to attack Zimmerman. Initially he ran away....Z even reported to the dispatcher that the suspect was running...the dispatcher asked Z which direction the suspect was headed....that was when George got out of his truck to see which way Trayvon was going.

Trayvon eluded George and George had no idea where he was but thought he had left the area. That was the point where the dispatcher could hear wind in the phone and asked George if he was following the suspect. George replied in the affirmative and the dispatchers exact words were "we do not need you to do that" George replied o.k. However, George wanted to give the police who had been summoned and were on the way an exact address so they could easily find him, thus he walked a little way further to be able to see a street address. This is where so many liberals want to confuse the story. They claim Z continued to follow Trayvon even after the dispatcher suggested he should not do that.

How could he follow someone he could not see and had no idea where he was. George thought trayvon had run away and the thing was over. All George wanted at that point was to get a exact address and meet with the police.

My word...what a penchant for fiction u have...Treyvon was on his way HOME to his dad's house in that complex with a bag of skittles for his cuz who was staying there...He had no weapon or tool of any kind on his person..and no record of burglary or any other crime.
Actually it was only Zimmerman that had an arrest record...for assault on both an ex and a cop.
U have no evidence other than Z's own self serving account that Martin attacked him...it is actually more likely that Z attacked Martin, based on what Martin's GF heard on her cell before it went dead...
So - ur account has no credibility..,but it DOES demonstrate imagination and artistic license...maybe u should join Z's cohorts (some if whom testified for him) in writing a fictional novel about this tragic incident.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Papageorgio]

With all due respect, Doc...Zimmerman got the living tar beat out of him by your "child"...Trayvon Martin is dead today because he decided that violence was the proper response to someone challenging his right to be walking through that neighborhood. All he needed to do was tell George Zimmerman who he was and who he was visiting. Zimmerman was following Martin that night because Zimmerman didn't think the teenager belonged where he was. The real tragedy is someone lost their life because they chose to use their fists rather than simply talk to the person they were having an issue with. THAT is the lesson that should be learned from what happened that night!

Well...first of all Z never challenged Trayvon....never even spoke to him until Trayvon accosted him.

But you are correct in that it was Trayvon who chose violence and thus reaped his just reward.

Trayvon was not 'visiting' anyone in that complex,supposedly he just cut through there on his way home, though it was a dark and rainy night and he was lingering there for some reason. The time line brought out in the trial proved that trayvon had more than enough time to have been home before the incident happend....so he was lollygagging about on a dark and rainy night---why???? There are several possibilities...though it will never be known for sure. One very likely reason being that he was casing the neighborhood for a burglary. He had been previously caught with a burglary tool and in possession of stolen property and that neighborhood had been plagued by break-ins.

It is very clear that Trayvon for whatever reason decided to attack Zimmerman. Initially he ran away....Z even reported to the dispatcher that the suspect was running...the dispatcher asked Z which direction the suspect was headed....that was when George got out of his truck to see which way Trayvon was going.

Trayvon eluded George and George had no idea where he was but thought he had left the area. That was the point where the dispatcher could hear wind in the phone and asked George if he was following the suspect. George replied in the affirmative and the dispatchers exact words were "we do not need you to do that" George replied o.k. However, George wanted to give the police who had been summoned and were on the way an exact address so they could easily find him, thus he walked a little way further to be able to see a street address. This is where so many liberals want to confuse the story. They claim Z continued to follow Trayvon even after the dispatcher suggested he should not do that.

How could he follow someone he could not see and had no idea where he was. George thought trayvon had run away and the thing was over. All George wanted at that point was to get a exact address and meet with the police.

My word...what a penchant for fiction u have...Treyvon was on his way HOME to his dad's house in that complex with a bag of skittles for his cuz who was staying there...He had no weapon or tool of any kind on his person..and no record of burglary or any other crime.
Actually it was only Zimmerman that had an arrest record...for assault on both an ex and a cop.
U have no evidence other than Z's own self serving account that Martin attacked him...it is actually more likely that Z attacked Martin, based on what Martin's GF heard on her cell before it went dead...
So - ur account has no credibility..,but it DOES demonstrate imagination and artistic license...maybe u should join Z's cohorts (some if whom testified for him) in writing a fictional novel about this tragic incident.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

The issue is that liberals are upset and mad at Kobe for NOT having an opinion either way. The guy doesn't tow the liberal line so he is an Uncle Tom. The "boy" should support Trayvon or the "boy" should shut his mouth.

That's what this thread is about. Zimmerman was found not guilty, all your insignificant babble won't change that.

The real issue is the liberals racism.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Bad Negro

Why would I care?

Because one of your slaves is trying to escape

Because one of your slaves is trying to escape

I have slaves? Maybe sex slaves.

Are they black?

Are they black?

All races.

Slut

All races.

Slut

Bigot

. . . she retorted oh-so predictably.

 

[Luissa]

Bad Negro

Because one of your slaves is trying to escape

Slut

Bigot

. . . she retorted oh-so predictably.

So stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Luissa]

Slut

Bigot

Do you fuck black guys to prove you're not racist?

Only on Thursdays


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[VoiceInTheWilde]

With all due respect, Doc...Zimmerman got the living tar beat out of him by your "child"...Trayvon Martin is dead today because he decided that violence was the proper response to someone challenging his right to be walking through that neighborhood. All he needed to do was tell George Zimmerman who he was and who he was visiting. Zimmerman was following Martin that night because Zimmerman didn't think the teenager belonged where he was. The real tragedy is someone lost their life because they chose to use their fists rather than simply talk to the person they were having an issue with. THAT is the lesson that should be learned from what happened that night!

Well...first of all Z never challenged Trayvon....never even spoke to him until Trayvon accosted him.

But you are correct in that it was Trayvon who chose violence and thus reaped his just reward.

Trayvon was not 'visiting' anyone in that complex,supposedly he just cut through there on his way home, though it was a dark and rainy night and he was lingering there for some reason. The time line brought out in the trial proved that trayvon had more than enough time to have been home before the incident happend....so he was lollygagging about on a dark and rainy night---why???? There are several possibilities...though it will never be known for sure. One very likely reason being that he was casing the neighborhood for a burglary. He had been previously caught with a burglary tool and in possession of stolen property and that neighborhood had been plagued by break-ins.

It is very clear that Trayvon for whatever reason decided to attack Zimmerman. Initially he ran away....Z even reported to the dispatcher that the suspect was running...the dispatcher asked Z which direction the suspect was headed....that was when George got out of his truck to see which way Trayvon was going.

Trayvon eluded George and George had no idea where he was but thought he had left the area. That was the point where the dispatcher could hear wind in the phone and asked George if he was following the suspect. George replied in the affirmative and the dispatchers exact words were "we do not need you to do that" George replied o.k. However, George wanted to give the police who had been summoned and were on the way an exact address so they could easily find him, thus he walked a little way further to be able to see a street address. This is where so many liberals want to confuse the story. They claim Z continued to follow Trayvon even after the dispatcher suggested he should not do that.

How could he follow someone he could not see and had no idea where he was. George thought trayvon had run away and the thing was over. All George wanted at that point was to get a exact address and meet with the police.

My word...what a penchant for fiction u have...Treyvon was on his way HOME to his dad's house in that complex with a bag of skittles for his cuz who was staying there...He had no weapon or tool of any kind on his person..and no record of burglary or any other crime.
Actually it was only Zimmerman that had an arrest record...for assault on both an ex and a cop.
U have no evidence other than Z's own self serving account that Martin attacked him...it is actually more likely that Z attacked Martin, based on what Martin's GF heard on her cell before it went dead...
So - ur account has no credibility..,but it DOES demonstrate imagination and artistic license...maybe u should join Z's cohorts (some if whom testified for him) in writing a fictional novel about this tragic incident.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Oh my bad....I must apologize Trayvon had some 'skittles' of course that makes him innocent. Again, I apologize for not understanding that.

But let me ask you one question, why would Z attack trayvon?

You know I am sure that the states 'star-witness' bombed and anything she said can be discounted as the jury obviously did.

BTW That is one reason why we have juries--they can listen to the actual testimony from all the witnesses and decide who is the most credible ah duh!

Also, you seem to not understand that Z had been through indicidents like this many times whilst performing his duty as a watchman--see a suspect or someone behaving suspiciously and call the police and wait for the police. Z had never attacked any of these suspects before--why would he suddenly decide to attack a suspect on that dark and rainy night?

Let us try and use some logic and a little common sense here--Z knew the police were on the way and would be there very soon, knowing that why would he attack Trayvon?

If one wants to kill a black guy it would be very easy to do if that is what you want to do...but you would not first call the police and then stalk, chase jump on top of and then pull out your gun and shoot the black guy knowing the police will be there within moments. Makes absolutely no sense.

On the other hand Trayvon did not know the police were on the way and only moments from arriving. He had more than enough time to get home. But Trayvon chose not to go home, he had another plan.

Also suppressed evidence shows Trayvon had a penchant for fighting. The suppressed evidence also shows he had been caught with stolen property and a burglary tool in addition to being high on marijuana the very night he was killed whilst suspended from school.

 

[emilynghiem]

I think the reaction is from HIM "criticizing" Lebron James for sympathizing with the Martins.
So of course people are going to "criticize" Kobe in return for not sympathizing.

Maybe Kobe could have clarified he equally supports people like Lebron and the Martin supporters, as he supports people who sympathize with Zimmerman.

If he showed equal support, maybe that would have been seen as more neutral or inclusive, so he might have been understood and respected equally in return.

Kobe is NOT supporting zimmerman. He's just trying to mind his own business and not support anyone, but the hatefilled progs won't allow that.

Kobe Bryant criticizes Lebron James for supporting Trayvon Martin | Mail Online

29 March 2014
LA Lakers star Kobe Bryant has been heavily criticized after saying that he didn't think he should necessarily have an opinion on Trayvon Martin's shooting just because he is African American.

Asked about that, Bryant said he took exception to any idea that Africa-Americans should hold opinions based on their race alone.

'I won’t react to something just because I’m supposed to, because I’m an African-American,' Bryant said.

'Yet you want to talk about how far we’ve progressed as a society? Well, we’ve progressed as a society, then don’t jump to somebody’s defense just because they’re African-American.

The comments have provoked a huge backlash and debate and led to accusations that Bryant is out of touch with real African-American issues.

Civil rights activist Najee Ali, director of Project Islamic H.O.P.E., called for a boycott of all things Bryant.

'Bryant doesn’t identify with the struggle that our African-American youth face nationally. So why should we continue to support Bryant who has never truly identified with the African American experience.'

 

[VoiceInTheWilde]

We all know the judge in the case was heavily biased for Trayvon which was easily observed--how she let the state's star witness act up, how she suppressed anything she possibly could that might reflect negatively on trayvon the little angel who ony wanted to get some skittles and ice tea on a dark and rainy night. yeh right.

For the truth of this matter>>>>

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/police-buried-trayvons-criminal-history/

 

[VoiceInTheWilde]

Any rational person understands that the only reason Z was prosecuted was because of high ranking politicians being pressured by black activists to put pressure on Florida's governor to do exactly that and with the help of the media a show trial was begun.

Trayvon Martin?s Involvement In Local Burglaries Covered Up By Media, School, Police, Prosecutors : Freedom Outpost

 

[emilynghiem]

My word...what a penchant for fiction u have...Treyvon was on his way HOME to his dad's house in that complex with a bag of skittles for his cuz who was staying there...He had no weapon or tool of any kind on his person..and no record of burglary or any other crime.
Actually it was only Zimmerman that had an arrest record...for assault on both an ex and a cop.
U have no evidence other than Z's own self serving account that Martin attacked him...it is actually more likely that Z attacked Martin, based on what Martin's GF heard on her cell before it went dead...
So - ur account has no credibility..,but it DOES demonstrate imagination and artistic license...maybe u should join Z's cohorts (some if whom testified for him) in writing a fictional novel about this tragic incident.

1. Zimmerman also went against authority to defend a homeless black man from targeting by law enforcement based on race:
Elk Grove Online - Zimmerman defended black homeless man attacked by police in 2010

2. And Martin's "innocent" pack of Skittles and "innocent" iced tea, turned out to be Arizona Watermelon Tea and Skittles used to make "lean" or "drank" (where the consumption by kids and teens is linked to aggressive behavior. Whether caused or correlated, Martin had an equal background of fighting (MMA style) and drug use that got him suspended from school. If this doesn't count because it wasn't allowed on court record, why should Zimmerman's count either if all those charges were dropped as well; sounds pretty equal to me, that they both had issues, none of which justifies getting into a deadly fight.)

The media left all this out, too, to write the book on inciting mutual anger on BOTH sides, to ensure higher ratings.
The media wins, both Martin and Zimmerman LOSE. And anyone who cares about justice and peace for the families and communities affected.

 

[VoiceInTheWilde]

Star witness contradicts herself in court - YouTube

An unbiased judge would have cited her for contempt of court and put her in the cooler for awhile.

And this was supposed to be the State's star witness. What a joke.

And who was the joke on? The taxpayers of Florida who had to foot the bill for this nonsense.

http://globalgrind.com/2013/03/11/g...rtin-trial-costs-city-sanford-600000-details/

Anyone want to guess what this 'Florida Show Trial' cost the taxpayers?

Plus the state of floriday may have to pay for Z's defense. http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/08/28/george-zimmerman-asks-florida-pay-legal-fees

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Any rational person understands that the only reason Z was prosecuted was because of high ranking politicians being pressured by black activists to put pressure on Florida's governor to do exactly that and with the help of the media a show trial was begun.

Yes indeed. Zimbo "won" but he's now saddled with millions in legal fees so in a sense the white-haters won. There's no way they could lose really. Maybe zimbo can write a book and get some money back. It's awful the way our "legal system" bankrupts innocent people.

 

[VoiceInTheWilde]

Any rational person understands that the only reason Z was prosecuted was because of high ranking politicians being pressured by black activists to put pressure on Florida's governor to do exactly that and with the help of the media a show trial was begun.

Yes indeed. Zimbo "won" but he's now saddled with millions in legal fees so in a sense the white-haters won. There's no way they could lose really. Maybe zimbo can write a book and get some money back. It's awful the way our "legal system" bankrupts innocent people.

Zimmerman will eventually be in a good financial situation....Florida may have to pay for his legal team, he just sold a couple of paintings for over a hundred thousand dollars, he has a big time law-suit filed against msnbc for lying about the case...intentionally-- a book deal of course and perhaps a movie not to mention all the money he can generate by doing speeches, public events etc.

 

[Asclepias]

Any rational person understands that the only reason Z was prosecuted was because of high ranking politicians being pressured by black activists to put pressure on Florida's governor to do exactly that and with the help of the media a show trial was begun.

Yes indeed. Zimbo "won" but he's now saddled with millions in legal fees so in a sense the white-haters won. There's no way they could lose really. Maybe zimbo can write a book and get some money back. It's awful the way our "legal system" bankrupts innocent people.

Zimmerman will eventually be in a good financial situation....Florida may have to pay for his legal team, he just sold a couple of paintings for over a hundred thousand dollars, he has a big time law-suit filed against msnbc for lying about the case...intentionally-- a book deal of course and perhaps a movie not to mention all the money he can generate by doing speeches, public events etc.

Z will eventually finish unraveling then he will crash and burn. Thats if someone doesnt murder him first. Mark my words.

 

[aplcr0331]

 

[Asclepias]

 

[aplcr0331]

HEY!!!!There's an Asian in that picture you Racist!

 

[Godboy]

It took decades for the US to produce all those notorious serial killers, yet black people in Chicago this year alone will double the number of murders that were comitted by the people in that picture. That is a shocking fact that you will ignore at all costs.

 

[Asclepias]

It took decades for the US to produce all those notorious serial killers, yet black people in Chicago this year alone will double the number of murders that were comitted by the people in that picture. That is a shocking fact that you will ignore at all costs.

Take care of the violence in your culture before you try and talk to anyone about the violence in the Black culture. Stop spending billions on wars killing people. White people are violent. concentrate on fixing that then talk to me after you have that cleared up.

 

[aplcr0331]

It took decades for the US to produce all those notorious serial killers, yet black people in Chicago this year alone will double the number of murders that were comitted by the people in that picture. That is a shocking fact that you will ignore at all costs.

Four of the squares make up one man. Some other squares are a knife. Others are teeth.


Why no Zimmerman?