Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag.

  1. Maybe our definition of a scumbag is different.

  2. Arrests and Convictions of George Floyd
    1. 1997: Drug Possession
      • Charge: Possession of a controlled substance (cocaine).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served time in jail (exact duration not specified in sources, likely a short sentence).
      • Details: This was one of Floyd’s earliest documented arrests in Harris County, Texas.

        Background Check: Investigating George Floyd’s Criminal Record
    2. 1998: Theft with a Firearm
      • Charge: Theft involving a firearm (not armed robbery, as some claims misstate).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served 10 months in Harris County Jail.
      • Details: Court records confirm this was for theft, not armed robbery. Claims of armed robbery in 1998 are inaccurate.

        Background Check: Investigating George Floyd’s Criminal Record
    3. 2002: Drug Possession
      • Charge: Possession of a controlled substance (cocaine).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served 8 months in prison.
      • Details: Floyd was arrested for possessing cocaine in Houston.
    4. 2004: Drug Possession
    5. 2005: Drug Possession
    6. 2007: Aggravated Robbery with a Deadly Weapon
      • Charge: Aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (home invasion).
      • Outcome: Pleaded guilty.
      • Sentence: Served 5 years in prison (2009–2013, paroled in 2013).
      • Details: Floyd was accused of entering an apartment in Houston with five other men, impersonating a water department worker, and holding a pistol to a woman’s stomach while searching for items to steal. The victim was not confirmed pregnant, despite some claims. Floyd pleaded guilty to avoid a potential 40-year sentence if convicted at trial. He maintained to friends he was not guilty but took the plea deal due to concerns about an unfair trial.

        George Floyd - Wikipedia
    7. Other Arrests (1997–2007):
      • Additional Charges: Court records indicate Floyd was arrested nine times in Harris County, Texas, between 1997 and 2007. In addition to the above, these included:
        • Two theft charges (one in 1998, detailed above, and another unspecified).
        • One illegal trespass charge.
        • One charge of failure to identify to a police officer.
      • Outcome: Most resulted in short jail sentences or fines, not prison time.
      • Details: These charges were primarily non-violent, related to drug possession or minor theft. Exact dates and outcomes for these additional arrests are less detailed in sources but are confirmed by Harris County court records.
    8. 2019: Arrest in Minneapolis
      • Charge: Not formally charged; detained briefly.
      • Outcome: Released without charges.
      • Details: Body camera footage from a May 2019 arrest in Minneapolis showed Floyd detained by police. The defense in Derek Chauvin’s trial argued this incident showed similar behavior (e.g., distress, possible drug ingestion), but the judge limited its use as evidence. This arrest did not result in a conviction.

        Who was George Floyd?
 
Floyd was an alleged small time criminal who died in Police custody. About 3 billion (with a B) in damages were done after the media got hold of the incident and played the race card. There was about zero damages over the Kirk assassination
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Floyd was a scumbag.

Kirk was not.

Stupid thread.
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?


Well, Floyd wasn't up for citizen of the year.
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Compare the two. Which one is the scumbag?
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

In many ways Floyd was a scumbag.

So what?
 
  1. Maybe our definition of a scumbag is different.

  2. Arrests and Convictions of George Floyd
    1. 1997: Drug Possession
      • Charge: Possession of a controlled substance (cocaine).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served time in jail (exact duration not specified in sources, likely a short sentence).
      • Details: This was one of Floyd’s earliest documented arrests in Harris County, Texas.

        Background Check: Investigating George Floyd’s Criminal Record
    2. 1998: Theft with a Firearm
      • Charge: Theft involving a firearm (not armed robbery, as some claims misstate).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served 10 months in Harris County Jail.
      • Details: Court records confirm this was for theft, not armed robbery. Claims of armed robbery in 1998 are inaccurate.

        Background Check: Investigating George Floyd’s Criminal Record
    3. 2002: Drug Possession
      • Charge: Possession of a controlled substance (cocaine).
      • Outcome: Convicted.
      • Sentence: Served 8 months in prison.
      • Details: Floyd was arrested for possessing cocaine in Houston.
    4. 2004: Drug Possession
    5. 2005: Drug Possession
    6. 2007: Aggravated Robbery with a Deadly Weapon
      • Charge: Aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (home invasion).
      • Outcome: Pleaded guilty.
      • Sentence: Served 5 years in prison (2009–2013, paroled in 2013).
      • Details: Floyd was accused of entering an apartment in Houston with five other men, impersonating a water department worker, and holding a pistol to a woman’s stomach while searching for items to steal. The victim was not confirmed pregnant, despite some claims. Floyd pleaded guilty to avoid a potential 40-year sentence if convicted at trial. He maintained to friends he was not guilty but took the plea deal due to concerns about an unfair trial.

        George Floyd - Wikipedia
    7. Other Arrests (1997–2007):
      • Additional Charges: Court records indicate Floyd was arrested nine times in Harris County, Texas, between 1997 and 2007. In addition to the above, these included:
        • Two theft charges (one in 1998, detailed above, and another unspecified).
        • One illegal trespass charge.
        • One charge of failure to identify to a police officer.
      • Outcome: Most resulted in short jail sentences or fines, not prison time.
      • Details: These charges were primarily non-violent, related to drug possession or minor theft. Exact dates and outcomes for these additional arrests are less detailed in sources but are confirmed by Harris County court records.
    8. 2019: Arrest in Minneapolis
      • Charge: Not formally charged; detained briefly.
      • Outcome: Released without charges.
      • Details: Body camera footage from a May 2019 arrest in Minneapolis showed Floyd detained by police. The defense in Derek Chauvin’s trial argued this incident showed similar behavior (e.g., distress, possible drug ingestion), but the judge limited its use as evidence. This arrest did not result in a conviction.

        Who was George Floyd?
That should end the whole who was a scumbag discussion.
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?
A year and half after the scumbag's death. Not while his widow hadn't even buried the man.,
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?




Even though George Floyd served 5 years for holding a woman at gunpoint while she was robbed, I dont think he deserved to die or be executed, and as long as we are still breathing maybe we should all get second chances to the end.
I see what your saying here, but the fundamentals of these cases are quite different, and by the way... when George Floyd died, I did not call him a scum bag, I felt sorry for him in the way that he went out of this world. But thats just me. I find it in very bad taste to speak Ill of the dead unless, they maybe murdered a bunch of people , set someone on fire...something like that.

The thing is here though, one case involved an officer interaction/ altercation/ intervention... whatever you want to call it with a person a cop suspected of something. The end result of that became the subject of rogue cops, racist cops, and improper police procedure involving tactics AND medical attention, perhaps.
By people calling George Floyd a scumbag because of his past criminal history, it might rightly be seen as in bad taste and heartless by some because he suffered beyond whatever crime he might have been comiting at the moment.
But at the end of the day, what is that going to change? is it going to affect the way police behaviour as it relates to their interactions with criminals or with the public? I doubt it.

The other case was not about a random run in with a cop, it was about a planned assasination, and an assination over speech in America. Considering how easily SPEECH itself can be manipulated on the internet to portray whatever you want from someone, its an insanly dangerous moment in time.
Anyone who takes a strong stance on ANYTHING these days publicly is going to be offensive to someone. So does that make anyone fair game for assasination? When "offensive " speech keeps getting reacted to as if there was a crime commited, and the person who spoke those words is now a "this or that" and we allow ourselves to be desenstised to assassinations for speech... then America will completely unravel and we will become a third world nation.
 
No one in their right mind would support George Floyd. He was nothing but a drug addicted criminal.
Who basically committed suicide by overdose and the left and blacks railroaded the cop into prison for it. Burned entire cities and rioted across the country over this one piece of shit.
 
George Floyd was no angel. He had a long list of criminal convictions.

What we observed on film was Chauvin murdering Floyd right in front of our own eyes, all with a big smirk knowing full well the Coroner would fudge another autopsy and get Chauvin off the hook, for at least the 7th time (the previous 6 were 1 black and.... shhhhhh 5 whites).

Anyone who knows anything about Fentanyl understands that any human who ingests twice lethal dose is completely incapacitated in two minutes and doorknob dead in 5. The tape we all observed of Floyd and Chauvin proves 100% that Floyd did not ingest twice lethal dose of Fentanyl, not one tenth of that even...

The Coroner's claim that Floyd died of Fentanyl would never stand up in court. Somehow BLM and everyone else has never ever EVER questioned that coroner's credibility, bias, fraud, accessory to mass murder, treason....
 
15th post
George Floyd was no angel. He had a long list of criminal convictions.

What we observed on film was Chauvin murdering Floyd right in front of our own eyes, all with a big smirk knowing full well the Coroner would fudge another autopsy and get Chauvin off the hook, for at least the 7th time (the previous 6 were 1 black and.... shhhhhh 5 whites).

Anyone who knows anything about Fentanyl understands that any human who ingests twice lethal dose is completely incapacitated in two minutes and doorknob dead in 5. The tape we all observed of Floyd and Chauvin proves 100% that Floyd did not ingest twice lethal dose of Fentanyl, not one tenth of that even...

The Coroner's claim that Floyd died of Fentanyl would never stand up in court. Somehow BLM and everyone else has never ever EVER questioned that coroner's credibility, bias, fraud, accessory to mass murder, treason....
They never let that be known in court. Congrats on your railroad job.
 
Many think Kirk was a scumbag.
Many who are Left-wing scumbags who exist living off the productivity of real working Americans and are scumbag criminals like G. Floyd was will think Kirk was a "scumbag" since he didn't mirror their delusions and scams.

Guess where you lie dipshit ? !!!
 
Kirk said Floyd was a scumbag, but didn't deserve to die. His followers didn't have a problem with that remark. What would the response be if someone said Kirk was a scumbag but didn't deserve to die? How do those two remarks differ? Why is one acceptable but not the other?

Because MAGA!!!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom